Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.

Many everyday estimation tasks have an inherently discrete nature, whether the task is counting objects (e.g., a number of paint buckets) or estimating discretized continuous variables (e.g., the number of paint buckets needed to paint a room). While Bayesian inference is often used for modeling est...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam N Sanborn, Ulrik R Beierholm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-04-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4829178?pdf=render
id doaj-912862990b6347888a4fc908c50e9c5f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-912862990b6347888a4fc908c50e9c5f2020-11-25T02:43:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582016-04-01124e100485910.1371/journal.pcbi.1004859Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.Adam N SanbornUlrik R BeierholmMany everyday estimation tasks have an inherently discrete nature, whether the task is counting objects (e.g., a number of paint buckets) or estimating discretized continuous variables (e.g., the number of paint buckets needed to paint a room). While Bayesian inference is often used for modeling estimates made along continuous scales, discrete numerical estimates have not received as much attention, despite their common everyday occurrence. Using two tasks, a numerosity task and an area estimation task, we invoke Bayesian decision theory to characterize how people learn discrete numerical distributions and make numerical estimates. Across three experiments with novel stimulus distributions we found that participants fell between two common decision functions for converting their uncertain representation into a response: drawing a sample from their posterior distribution and taking the maximum of their posterior distribution. While this was consistent with the decision function found in previous work using continuous estimation tasks, surprisingly the prior distributions learned by participants in our experiments were much more adaptive: When making continuous estimates, participants have required thousands of trials to learn bimodal priors, but in our tasks participants learned discrete bimodal and even discrete quadrimodal priors within a few hundred trials. This makes discrete numerical estimation tasks good testbeds for investigating how people learn and make estimates.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4829178?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adam N Sanborn
Ulrik R Beierholm
spellingShingle Adam N Sanborn
Ulrik R Beierholm
Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Adam N Sanborn
Ulrik R Beierholm
author_sort Adam N Sanborn
title Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.
title_short Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.
title_full Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.
title_fullStr Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.
title_full_unstemmed Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.
title_sort fast and accurate learning when making discrete numerical estimates.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Many everyday estimation tasks have an inherently discrete nature, whether the task is counting objects (e.g., a number of paint buckets) or estimating discretized continuous variables (e.g., the number of paint buckets needed to paint a room). While Bayesian inference is often used for modeling estimates made along continuous scales, discrete numerical estimates have not received as much attention, despite their common everyday occurrence. Using two tasks, a numerosity task and an area estimation task, we invoke Bayesian decision theory to characterize how people learn discrete numerical distributions and make numerical estimates. Across three experiments with novel stimulus distributions we found that participants fell between two common decision functions for converting their uncertain representation into a response: drawing a sample from their posterior distribution and taking the maximum of their posterior distribution. While this was consistent with the decision function found in previous work using continuous estimation tasks, surprisingly the prior distributions learned by participants in our experiments were much more adaptive: When making continuous estimates, participants have required thousands of trials to learn bimodal priors, but in our tasks participants learned discrete bimodal and even discrete quadrimodal priors within a few hundred trials. This makes discrete numerical estimation tasks good testbeds for investigating how people learn and make estimates.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4829178?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT adamnsanborn fastandaccuratelearningwhenmakingdiscretenumericalestimates
AT ulrikrbeierholm fastandaccuratelearningwhenmakingdiscretenumericalestimates
_version_ 1724770644880523264