Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia

Modern agricultural farming systems acidify the soil profile due to application of fertilisers with acidifying properties. In most parts of Australia, lime has been used to improve agricultural soil conditions and restore its productive potential. The observed response of crop yield to applied lime...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yvette M. Oliver, Chris Gazey, James Fisher, Michael Robertson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/5/829
id doaj-910fc52cd0fd4ba1b6d193cf144829ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-910fc52cd0fd4ba1b6d193cf144829ec2021-04-23T23:01:32ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952021-04-011182982910.3390/agronomy11050829Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in AustraliaYvette M. Oliver0Chris Gazey1James Fisher2Michael Robertson3Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Underwood Avenue, Floreat, WA 6014, AustraliaDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), East Perth, WA 6004, AustraliaDésiree Futures, York, WA 6302, AustraliaCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Underwood Avenue, Floreat, WA 6014, AustraliaModern agricultural farming systems acidify the soil profile due to application of fertilisers with acidifying properties. In most parts of Australia, lime has been used to improve agricultural soil conditions and restore its productive potential. The observed response of crop yield to applied lime often varies with soil type, acidity profile and seasonal conditions, so it is difficult to specify the expected yield response in a given situation. We conducted a meta-analysis of 86 agricultural field trials from Western Australia (WA), New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria (VIC) where various rates of lime had been applied to the soil surface and crop yield (wheat, barley, canola, lupin or field pea) measured for a number of years after the initial application. Information from the meta-analysis was then paired with output from a crop simulation model, where the water-limited yield potential was estimated for both a neutral and acidified soil profile. The average increase in yield to applied lime across all locations and crops was 12%, but the response ranged from 0 to 185%. A trend was observed, where sites with topsoil pH (CaCl<sub>2</sub>) < 5 and subsoil pH < 4.5 had the greater benefit to liming. Soil type had little effect on the percentage yield increase. Overall, responses to applied lime were most likely when the yield of the trial site was at 50% of water-limited yield potential (or less), the quantity of lime applied was greater than 2.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and the time since lime had been applied was greater than three years (with the maximum response occurring from four and sometimes up to eight years after liming). Therefore, soil pH measurements, combined with an assessment of actual yield relative to potential yield, provide the best guide to the response to surface applied lime and this response is likely to take more than four years to be realised.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/5/829soil aciditylimingcrop yieldsoil constraints
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yvette M. Oliver
Chris Gazey
James Fisher
Michael Robertson
spellingShingle Yvette M. Oliver
Chris Gazey
James Fisher
Michael Robertson
Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia
Agronomy
soil acidity
liming
crop yield
soil constraints
author_facet Yvette M. Oliver
Chris Gazey
James Fisher
Michael Robertson
author_sort Yvette M. Oliver
title Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia
title_short Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia
title_full Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia
title_fullStr Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia
title_sort dissection of the contributing factors to the variable response of crop yield to surface applied lime in australia
publisher MDPI AG
series Agronomy
issn 2073-4395
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Modern agricultural farming systems acidify the soil profile due to application of fertilisers with acidifying properties. In most parts of Australia, lime has been used to improve agricultural soil conditions and restore its productive potential. The observed response of crop yield to applied lime often varies with soil type, acidity profile and seasonal conditions, so it is difficult to specify the expected yield response in a given situation. We conducted a meta-analysis of 86 agricultural field trials from Western Australia (WA), New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria (VIC) where various rates of lime had been applied to the soil surface and crop yield (wheat, barley, canola, lupin or field pea) measured for a number of years after the initial application. Information from the meta-analysis was then paired with output from a crop simulation model, where the water-limited yield potential was estimated for both a neutral and acidified soil profile. The average increase in yield to applied lime across all locations and crops was 12%, but the response ranged from 0 to 185%. A trend was observed, where sites with topsoil pH (CaCl<sub>2</sub>) < 5 and subsoil pH < 4.5 had the greater benefit to liming. Soil type had little effect on the percentage yield increase. Overall, responses to applied lime were most likely when the yield of the trial site was at 50% of water-limited yield potential (or less), the quantity of lime applied was greater than 2.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and the time since lime had been applied was greater than three years (with the maximum response occurring from four and sometimes up to eight years after liming). Therefore, soil pH measurements, combined with an assessment of actual yield relative to potential yield, provide the best guide to the response to surface applied lime and this response is likely to take more than four years to be realised.
topic soil acidity
liming
crop yield
soil constraints
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/5/829
work_keys_str_mv AT yvettemoliver dissectionofthecontributingfactorstothevariableresponseofcropyieldtosurfaceappliedlimeinaustralia
AT chrisgazey dissectionofthecontributingfactorstothevariableresponseofcropyieldtosurfaceappliedlimeinaustralia
AT jamesfisher dissectionofthecontributingfactorstothevariableresponseofcropyieldtosurfaceappliedlimeinaustralia
AT michaelrobertson dissectionofthecontributingfactorstothevariableresponseofcropyieldtosurfaceappliedlimeinaustralia
_version_ 1721512190013341696