Individual Differences in Mental Accounting

Individual differences in mental accounting have rarely been studied, and empirical evidence regarding the relation between mental accounting and personality characteristics is scarce. The present paper reports three studies applying a Likert-type scale to assess the extent individuals engage in men...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephan Muehlbacher, Erich Kirchler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02866/full
id doaj-90f830d059da40b2b759dc9ad766ae72
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90f830d059da40b2b759dc9ad766ae722020-11-25T01:31:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-12-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.02866492282Individual Differences in Mental AccountingStephan MuehlbacherErich KirchlerIndividual differences in mental accounting have rarely been studied, and empirical evidence regarding the relation between mental accounting and personality characteristics is scarce. The present paper reports three studies applying a Likert-type scale to assess the extent individuals engage in mental accounting practices. In each study, the five items of the measure loaded on a single dimension and had acceptable reliability, with a Cronbach’s α between 0.72 and 0.77. Study 1 (N = 165) regards the mental processing of prior losses in the theater-ticket problem (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981). Study 2 (N = 114) is based on prior work on income source effects (Fogel, 1997) and analyzes mental accounting of prior gains. In both studies, individual differences in mental accounting moderated the effects of the experimental treatments. In an explorative survey conducted for Study 3 (N = 373), the extent of engaging in mental accounting was found to be positively correlated with being female, with conscientiousness, and financial literacy, and negatively related with education and non-planning impulsivity. Identification of individual differences and their correlates adds to existing evidence for some of the core assumptions of mental accounting theory. A practical implication of the findings is that providers of financial services must take individual differences into account when designing trainings and supportive tools for money management.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02866/fullmental accountingtheater-ticket problemincome sourceconscientiousnessimpulsivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephan Muehlbacher
Erich Kirchler
spellingShingle Stephan Muehlbacher
Erich Kirchler
Individual Differences in Mental Accounting
Frontiers in Psychology
mental accounting
theater-ticket problem
income source
conscientiousness
impulsivity
author_facet Stephan Muehlbacher
Erich Kirchler
author_sort Stephan Muehlbacher
title Individual Differences in Mental Accounting
title_short Individual Differences in Mental Accounting
title_full Individual Differences in Mental Accounting
title_fullStr Individual Differences in Mental Accounting
title_full_unstemmed Individual Differences in Mental Accounting
title_sort individual differences in mental accounting
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Individual differences in mental accounting have rarely been studied, and empirical evidence regarding the relation between mental accounting and personality characteristics is scarce. The present paper reports three studies applying a Likert-type scale to assess the extent individuals engage in mental accounting practices. In each study, the five items of the measure loaded on a single dimension and had acceptable reliability, with a Cronbach’s α between 0.72 and 0.77. Study 1 (N = 165) regards the mental processing of prior losses in the theater-ticket problem (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981). Study 2 (N = 114) is based on prior work on income source effects (Fogel, 1997) and analyzes mental accounting of prior gains. In both studies, individual differences in mental accounting moderated the effects of the experimental treatments. In an explorative survey conducted for Study 3 (N = 373), the extent of engaging in mental accounting was found to be positively correlated with being female, with conscientiousness, and financial literacy, and negatively related with education and non-planning impulsivity. Identification of individual differences and their correlates adds to existing evidence for some of the core assumptions of mental accounting theory. A practical implication of the findings is that providers of financial services must take individual differences into account when designing trainings and supportive tools for money management.
topic mental accounting
theater-ticket problem
income source
conscientiousness
impulsivity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02866/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanmuehlbacher individualdifferencesinmentalaccounting
AT erichkirchler individualdifferencesinmentalaccounting
_version_ 1725084502247604224