Assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students
Abstract Theoretical frameworks grounded in the social cognitive theory are used to discuss the need for assessing motivation, self-efficacy for learning and performance, metacognitive self-regulation of dually enrolled students. This study assessed motivation and learning strategy usage by Dually E...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Smart Learning Environments |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40561-020-00131-w |
id |
doaj-90effec4df5f439ab7ab1c9da3a5998c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-90effec4df5f439ab7ab1c9da3a5998c2020-11-25T01:25:42ZengSpringerOpenSmart Learning Environments2196-70912020-09-017111910.1186/s40561-020-00131-wAssessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled studentsMolly C. Day0Heather M. Kelley1Blaine L. Browne2Steven J. Kohn3Department of Psychology, Counseling, and Family Therapy, Valdosta State UniversityValdosta State UniversityValdosta State UniversityValdosta State UniversityAbstract Theoretical frameworks grounded in the social cognitive theory are used to discuss the need for assessing motivation, self-efficacy for learning and performance, metacognitive self-regulation of dually enrolled students. This study assessed motivation and learning strategy usage by Dually Enrolled Students participating in Georgia’s Dual Enrollment program. The research was conducted on 213 high school aged 14 to 18 years, in grades 9–12, and attended a high school in a seven-county service area in southwest Georgia. Participants all were taking classes under a program that allows them to simultaneously earn high school and college credit, and required them to attend a high school and college concurrently either at a technical college of the Technical System of Georgia, or a state college of the University System of Georgia. The research questions were answered using a cross-sectional survey, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, and demographics were used to classify participants based on age, grade, gender, number of classes completed in the Dual Enrollment program, teacher type for instruction, and the format/location of college class taken. The study’s findings added to the existing knowledge base regarding teenage students who are expected to conform to the role of college student simply because they were deemed academically equipped to take college classes. Furthermore, the findings of this study suggest the importance of implementing additional acceptance requirements to make sure students possess the maturity, motivation, and learning strategy application knowledge to be successful in college classes and that faculty has been trained to accommodate the learning needs of this specific type of learner.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40561-020-00131-wDual enrollmentCollege readinessAchievement goal theoryExpectancy-value theorySelf-efficacySelf-regulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Molly C. Day Heather M. Kelley Blaine L. Browne Steven J. Kohn |
spellingShingle |
Molly C. Day Heather M. Kelley Blaine L. Browne Steven J. Kohn Assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students Smart Learning Environments Dual enrollment College readiness Achievement goal theory Expectancy-value theory Self-efficacy Self-regulation |
author_facet |
Molly C. Day Heather M. Kelley Blaine L. Browne Steven J. Kohn |
author_sort |
Molly C. Day |
title |
Assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students |
title_short |
Assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students |
title_full |
Assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students |
title_fullStr |
Assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students |
title_sort |
assessing motivation and learning strategy usage by dually enrolled students |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Smart Learning Environments |
issn |
2196-7091 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Theoretical frameworks grounded in the social cognitive theory are used to discuss the need for assessing motivation, self-efficacy for learning and performance, metacognitive self-regulation of dually enrolled students. This study assessed motivation and learning strategy usage by Dually Enrolled Students participating in Georgia’s Dual Enrollment program. The research was conducted on 213 high school aged 14 to 18 years, in grades 9–12, and attended a high school in a seven-county service area in southwest Georgia. Participants all were taking classes under a program that allows them to simultaneously earn high school and college credit, and required them to attend a high school and college concurrently either at a technical college of the Technical System of Georgia, or a state college of the University System of Georgia. The research questions were answered using a cross-sectional survey, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, and demographics were used to classify participants based on age, grade, gender, number of classes completed in the Dual Enrollment program, teacher type for instruction, and the format/location of college class taken. The study’s findings added to the existing knowledge base regarding teenage students who are expected to conform to the role of college student simply because they were deemed academically equipped to take college classes. Furthermore, the findings of this study suggest the importance of implementing additional acceptance requirements to make sure students possess the maturity, motivation, and learning strategy application knowledge to be successful in college classes and that faculty has been trained to accommodate the learning needs of this specific type of learner. |
topic |
Dual enrollment College readiness Achievement goal theory Expectancy-value theory Self-efficacy Self-regulation |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40561-020-00131-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mollycday assessingmotivationandlearningstrategyusagebyduallyenrolledstudents AT heathermkelley assessingmotivationandlearningstrategyusagebyduallyenrolledstudents AT blainelbrowne assessingmotivationandlearningstrategyusagebyduallyenrolledstudents AT stevenjkohn assessingmotivationandlearningstrategyusagebyduallyenrolledstudents |
_version_ |
1725112406130032640 |