Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds
Social funds and large-scale community driven development (CDD) programmes are a popular policy instrument in post-conflict situations. This is partly because they are seen to alleviate pressure on governments to deliver development and reconstruction outcomes by transferring resources and responsib...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centre for Security Governance
2013-09-01
|
Series: | Stability : International Journal of Security and Development |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/104 |
id |
doaj-90e71ec6fb354b908e92feacc554b59d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-90e71ec6fb354b908e92feacc554b59d2020-11-25T00:44:22ZengCentre for Security GovernanceStability : International Journal of Security and Development2165-26272013-09-0123Art. 4910.5334/sta.cjFunds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social FundsRichard MallettRachel SlaterSocial funds and large-scale community driven development (CDD) programmes are a popular policy instrument in post-conflict situations. This is partly because they are seen to alleviate pressure on governments to deliver development and reconstruction outcomes by transferring resources and responsibilities to community actors. However, part of their popularity can also be explained by claims that social funds and CDD programmes have the (transformative) potential to generate impacts beyond meeting basic needs, such as creating more peaceful societies at the local level and promoting trust in government. Drawing on a rigorous, evidence focused literature review, which began with researchers following a formal systematic review protocol, this practice note assesses the performance of 13 programmes against three distinct sets of impact indicators: (i) incomes, enterprise and access to services; (ii) social cohesion, stability and violence; and (iii) state-society relations. It is concluded that, although our understanding of the effectiveness of social funds and CDD in conflict-affected environments is limited by a low number of rigorous evaluations across a diverse range of contexts, as well as by an insufficient investigation of the relevant causal mechanisms, the findings so far suggest cause for cautious optimism.http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/104programmingpost-conflict recoveryimpact evaluation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Richard Mallett Rachel Slater |
spellingShingle |
Richard Mallett Rachel Slater Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds Stability : International Journal of Security and Development programming post-conflict recovery impact evaluation |
author_facet |
Richard Mallett Rachel Slater |
author_sort |
Richard Mallett |
title |
Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds |
title_short |
Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds |
title_full |
Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds |
title_fullStr |
Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds |
title_full_unstemmed |
Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds |
title_sort |
funds for peace? examining the transformative potential of social funds |
publisher |
Centre for Security Governance |
series |
Stability : International Journal of Security and Development |
issn |
2165-2627 |
publishDate |
2013-09-01 |
description |
Social funds and large-scale community driven development (CDD) programmes are a popular policy instrument in post-conflict situations. This is partly because they are seen to alleviate pressure on governments to deliver development and reconstruction outcomes by transferring resources and responsibilities to community actors. However, part of their popularity can also be explained by claims that social funds and CDD programmes have the (transformative) potential to generate impacts beyond meeting basic needs, such as creating more peaceful societies at the local level and promoting trust in government. Drawing on a rigorous, evidence focused literature review, which began with researchers following a formal systematic review protocol, this practice note assesses the performance of 13 programmes against three distinct sets of impact indicators: (i) incomes, enterprise and access to services; (ii) social cohesion, stability and violence; and (iii) state-society relations. It is concluded that, although our understanding of the effectiveness of social funds and CDD in conflict-affected environments is limited by a low number of rigorous evaluations across a diverse range of contexts, as well as by an insufficient investigation of the relevant causal mechanisms, the findings so far suggest cause for cautious optimism. |
topic |
programming post-conflict recovery impact evaluation |
url |
http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/104 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT richardmallett fundsforpeaceexaminingthetransformativepotentialofsocialfunds AT rachelslater fundsforpeaceexaminingthetransformativepotentialofsocialfunds |
_version_ |
1725274721687175168 |