Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds

Social funds and large-scale community driven development (CDD) programmes are a popular policy instrument in post-conflict situations. This is partly because they are seen to alleviate pressure on governments to deliver development and reconstruction outcomes by transferring resources and responsib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard Mallett, Rachel Slater
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Security Governance 2013-09-01
Series:Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/104
id doaj-90e71ec6fb354b908e92feacc554b59d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90e71ec6fb354b908e92feacc554b59d2020-11-25T00:44:22ZengCentre for Security GovernanceStability : International Journal of Security and Development2165-26272013-09-0123Art. 4910.5334/sta.cjFunds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social FundsRichard MallettRachel SlaterSocial funds and large-scale community driven development (CDD) programmes are a popular policy instrument in post-conflict situations. This is partly because they are seen to alleviate pressure on governments to deliver development and reconstruction outcomes by transferring resources and responsibilities to community actors. However, part of their popularity can also be explained by claims that social funds and CDD programmes have the (transformative) potential to generate impacts beyond meeting basic needs, such as creating more peaceful societies at the local level and promoting trust in government. Drawing on a rigorous, evidence focused literature review, which began with researchers following a formal systematic review protocol, this practice note assesses the performance of 13 programmes against three distinct sets of impact indicators: (i) incomes, enterprise and access to services; (ii) social cohesion, stability and violence; and (iii) state-society relations. It is concluded that, although our understanding of the effectiveness of social funds and CDD in conflict-affected environments is limited by a low number of rigorous evaluations across a diverse range of contexts, as well as by an insufficient investigation of the relevant causal mechanisms, the findings so far suggest cause for cautious optimism.http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/104programmingpost-conflict recoveryimpact evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Mallett
Rachel Slater
spellingShingle Richard Mallett
Rachel Slater
Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds
Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
programming
post-conflict recovery
impact evaluation
author_facet Richard Mallett
Rachel Slater
author_sort Richard Mallett
title Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds
title_short Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds
title_full Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds
title_fullStr Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds
title_full_unstemmed Funds for Peace? Examining the Transformative Potential of Social Funds
title_sort funds for peace? examining the transformative potential of social funds
publisher Centre for Security Governance
series Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
issn 2165-2627
publishDate 2013-09-01
description Social funds and large-scale community driven development (CDD) programmes are a popular policy instrument in post-conflict situations. This is partly because they are seen to alleviate pressure on governments to deliver development and reconstruction outcomes by transferring resources and responsibilities to community actors. However, part of their popularity can also be explained by claims that social funds and CDD programmes have the (transformative) potential to generate impacts beyond meeting basic needs, such as creating more peaceful societies at the local level and promoting trust in government. Drawing on a rigorous, evidence focused literature review, which began with researchers following a formal systematic review protocol, this practice note assesses the performance of 13 programmes against three distinct sets of impact indicators: (i) incomes, enterprise and access to services; (ii) social cohesion, stability and violence; and (iii) state-society relations. It is concluded that, although our understanding of the effectiveness of social funds and CDD in conflict-affected environments is limited by a low number of rigorous evaluations across a diverse range of contexts, as well as by an insufficient investigation of the relevant causal mechanisms, the findings so far suggest cause for cautious optimism.
topic programming
post-conflict recovery
impact evaluation
url http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/104
work_keys_str_mv AT richardmallett fundsforpeaceexaminingthetransformativepotentialofsocialfunds
AT rachelslater fundsforpeaceexaminingthetransformativepotentialofsocialfunds
_version_ 1725274721687175168