Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation

Language is a sub-component of human cognition. One important, though often unattained goal for both cognitive scientists and linguists is to explicate how the meanings of words and sentences relate to the more general, non-linguistic, cognitive systems that are used to evaluate whether sentences ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darko Odic, Paul Pietroski, Tim Hunter, Justin Halberda, Jeffrey Lidz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2018-05-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/409
id doaj-90e1df179a2c4a1db8ee9f0f41238b32
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90e1df179a2c4a1db8ee9f0f41238b322021-09-02T04:03:09ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352018-05-013110.5334/gjgl.409225Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representationDarko Odic0Paul Pietroski1Tim Hunter2Justin Halberda3Jeffrey Lidz4University of British ColumbiaUniversity of Maryland College ParkUniversity of California Los AngelesJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of Maryland College ParkLanguage is a sub-component of human cognition. One important, though often unattained goal for both cognitive scientists and linguists is to explicate how the meanings of words and sentences relate to the more general, non-linguistic, cognitive systems that are used to evaluate whether sentences are true or false. In the present paper, we explore one such relationship: an interface between the linguistic structures referring to individuals and non-individuals (specifically, count-nouns like ‘cows’ and mass-nouns like ‘beef’) and the non-linguistic cognitive systems that quantify and compare number and area. While humans may be flexible in how they use language across contexts, in two experiments using standard psychophysical testing we find that participants evaluate a count-noun sentence via numerical representations and evaluate a corresponding mass-noun sentence via non-numerical representations; consistent with a principled interface between language and cognition for evaluating these terms. This was the case even when the visual display was held constant across conditions and only the noun type was varied, further suggesting an important difference in how area and number, as well as count and mass nouns, are represented. These findings speak to issues concerning the semantics-cognition interface, the mass-count distinction, and the psychophysics of quantity representation.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/409approximate number system, quantity representation, semantics-cognition interface, count/mass nouns, quantification.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Darko Odic
Paul Pietroski
Tim Hunter
Justin Halberda
Jeffrey Lidz
spellingShingle Darko Odic
Paul Pietroski
Tim Hunter
Justin Halberda
Jeffrey Lidz
Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation
Glossa
approximate number system, quantity representation, semantics-cognition interface, count/mass nouns, quantification.
author_facet Darko Odic
Paul Pietroski
Tim Hunter
Justin Halberda
Jeffrey Lidz
author_sort Darko Odic
title Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation
title_short Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation
title_full Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation
title_fullStr Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation
title_full_unstemmed Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation
title_sort individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: the mass/count distinction and quantity representation
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Language is a sub-component of human cognition. One important, though often unattained goal for both cognitive scientists and linguists is to explicate how the meanings of words and sentences relate to the more general, non-linguistic, cognitive systems that are used to evaluate whether sentences are true or false. In the present paper, we explore one such relationship: an interface between the linguistic structures referring to individuals and non-individuals (specifically, count-nouns like ‘cows’ and mass-nouns like ‘beef’) and the non-linguistic cognitive systems that quantify and compare number and area. While humans may be flexible in how they use language across contexts, in two experiments using standard psychophysical testing we find that participants evaluate a count-noun sentence via numerical representations and evaluate a corresponding mass-noun sentence via non-numerical representations; consistent with a principled interface between language and cognition for evaluating these terms. This was the case even when the visual display was held constant across conditions and only the noun type was varied, further suggesting an important difference in how area and number, as well as count and mass nouns, are represented. These findings speak to issues concerning the semantics-cognition interface, the mass-count distinction, and the psychophysics of quantity representation.
topic approximate number system, quantity representation, semantics-cognition interface, count/mass nouns, quantification.
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/409
work_keys_str_mv AT darkoodic individualsandnonindividualsincognitionandsemanticsthemasscountdistinctionandquantityrepresentation
AT paulpietroski individualsandnonindividualsincognitionandsemanticsthemasscountdistinctionandquantityrepresentation
AT timhunter individualsandnonindividualsincognitionandsemanticsthemasscountdistinctionandquantityrepresentation
AT justinhalberda individualsandnonindividualsincognitionandsemanticsthemasscountdistinctionandquantityrepresentation
AT jeffreylidz individualsandnonindividualsincognitionandsemanticsthemasscountdistinctionandquantityrepresentation
_version_ 1721180471637835776