A remote-control datalogger for large-scale resistivity surveys and robust processing of its signals using a software lock-in approach
We present a new versatile datalogger that can be used for a wide range of possible applications in geosciences. It is adjustable in signal strength and sampling frequency, battery saving and can remotely be controlled over a Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) connection so that it save...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems |
Online Access: | https://www.geosci-instrum-method-data-syst.net/7/55/2018/gi-7-55-2018.pdf |
Summary: | We present a new versatile datalogger that can be used for a wide range of
possible applications in geosciences. It is adjustable in signal strength
and sampling frequency, battery saving and can remotely be controlled over
a Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) connection so that it saves
running costs, particularly in monitoring experiments. The internet connection
allows for checking functionality, controlling schedules and optimizing
pre-amplification. We mainly use it for large-scale electrical resistivity
tomography (ERT), where it independently registers voltage time series on
three channels, while a square-wave current is injected. For the analysis of
this time series we present a new approach that is based on the lock-in (LI)
method, mainly known from electronic circuits. The method searches the
working point (phase) using three different functions based on a mask
signal, and determines the amplitude using a direct current (DC) correlation
function. We use synthetic data with different types of noise to compare the
new method with existing approaches, i.e. selective stacking and a modified
fast Fourier transformation (FFT)-based approach that assumes a 1∕<i>f</i> noise
characteristics. All methods give comparable results, but the LI is better
than the well-established stacking method. The FFT approach can be even
better but only if the noise strictly follows the assumed characteristics.
If overshoots are present in the data, which is typical in the field, FFT
performs worse even with good data, which is why we conclude that the new LI
approach is the most robust solution. This is also proved by a field data
set from a long 2-D ERT profile. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2193-0856 2193-0864 |