Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?

A central problem in evolutionary biology is to determine whether adaptive phenotypic variation within species (microevolution) ultimately gives rise to new species (macroevolution). Predation environment can select for trait divergence among populations within species. The implied hypothesis is tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark C. Belk, Spencer J. Ingley, Jerald B. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/12/5/179
id doaj-90cdcf6e79ad424eba54418b90aed576
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90cdcf6e79ad424eba54418b90aed5762020-11-25T02:38:13ZengMDPI AGDiversity1424-28182020-05-011217917910.3390/d12050179Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?Mark C. Belk0Spencer J. Ingley1Jerald B. Johnson2Department of Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USADepartment of Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USADepartment of Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USAA central problem in evolutionary biology is to determine whether adaptive phenotypic variation within species (microevolution) ultimately gives rise to new species (macroevolution). Predation environment can select for trait divergence among populations within species. The implied hypothesis is that the selection resulting from predation environment that creates population divergence within species would continue across the speciation boundary such that patterns of divergence after speciation would be a magnified accumulation of the trait variation observed before speciation. In this paper, we test for congruence in the mechanisms of microevolution and macroevolution by comparing the patterns of life history divergence among three closely related species of the livebearer genus <i>Brachyrhaphis</i> (Poeciliidae), namely <i>B. rhabdophora</i>, <i>B. roseni</i>, and <i>B. terrabensis</i>. Within <i>B. rhabdophora,</i> populations occur in either predator or predator-free environments, and have been considered to be at a nascent stage of speciation. Sister species <i>B. roseni</i> and <i>B. terrabensis</i> are segregated into predator and predator-free environments, respectively, and represent a post-speciation comparison. Male and female size at maturity, clutch size, and offspring size (and to a lesser extent reproductive allocation) all diverged according to predation environment and differences were amplified through evolutionary time, i.e., across the speciation boundary. Variation observed among nascent species differentiated by predation environment is a good predictor of variation among established species differentiated by predation environment. We found no evidence for different processes or different levels of selection acting across the speciation boundary, suggesting that macroevolution in these species can be understood as an accumulation of micro-evolutionary changes.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/12/5/179microevolutionspeciationmacroevolutionlife historyPoeciliidaepredation environment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark C. Belk
Spencer J. Ingley
Jerald B. Johnson
spellingShingle Mark C. Belk
Spencer J. Ingley
Jerald B. Johnson
Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?
Diversity
microevolution
speciation
macroevolution
life history
Poeciliidae
predation environment
author_facet Mark C. Belk
Spencer J. Ingley
Jerald B. Johnson
author_sort Mark C. Belk
title Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?
title_short Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?
title_full Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?
title_fullStr Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?
title_full_unstemmed Life History Divergence in Livebearing Fishes in Response to Predation: Is There a Microevolution to Macroevolution Barrier?
title_sort life history divergence in livebearing fishes in response to predation: is there a microevolution to macroevolution barrier?
publisher MDPI AG
series Diversity
issn 1424-2818
publishDate 2020-05-01
description A central problem in evolutionary biology is to determine whether adaptive phenotypic variation within species (microevolution) ultimately gives rise to new species (macroevolution). Predation environment can select for trait divergence among populations within species. The implied hypothesis is that the selection resulting from predation environment that creates population divergence within species would continue across the speciation boundary such that patterns of divergence after speciation would be a magnified accumulation of the trait variation observed before speciation. In this paper, we test for congruence in the mechanisms of microevolution and macroevolution by comparing the patterns of life history divergence among three closely related species of the livebearer genus <i>Brachyrhaphis</i> (Poeciliidae), namely <i>B. rhabdophora</i>, <i>B. roseni</i>, and <i>B. terrabensis</i>. Within <i>B. rhabdophora,</i> populations occur in either predator or predator-free environments, and have been considered to be at a nascent stage of speciation. Sister species <i>B. roseni</i> and <i>B. terrabensis</i> are segregated into predator and predator-free environments, respectively, and represent a post-speciation comparison. Male and female size at maturity, clutch size, and offspring size (and to a lesser extent reproductive allocation) all diverged according to predation environment and differences were amplified through evolutionary time, i.e., across the speciation boundary. Variation observed among nascent species differentiated by predation environment is a good predictor of variation among established species differentiated by predation environment. We found no evidence for different processes or different levels of selection acting across the speciation boundary, suggesting that macroevolution in these species can be understood as an accumulation of micro-evolutionary changes.
topic microevolution
speciation
macroevolution
life history
Poeciliidae
predation environment
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/12/5/179
work_keys_str_mv AT markcbelk lifehistorydivergenceinlivebearingfishesinresponsetopredationisthereamicroevolutiontomacroevolutionbarrier
AT spencerjingley lifehistorydivergenceinlivebearingfishesinresponsetopredationisthereamicroevolutiontomacroevolutionbarrier
AT jeraldbjohnson lifehistorydivergenceinlivebearingfishesinresponsetopredationisthereamicroevolutiontomacroevolutionbarrier
_version_ 1724792155939012608