The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.

BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the Germa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingo Gräff, Bernd Goldschmidt, Procula Glien, Manuela Bogdanow, Rolf Fimmers, Andreas Hoeft, Se-Chan Kim, Daniel Grigutsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3933424?pdf=render
id doaj-90bb91590a5243d0ba8f83ae30c6204d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90bb91590a5243d0ba8f83ae30c6204d2020-11-25T01:55:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8899510.1371/journal.pone.0088995The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.Ingo GräffBernd GoldschmidtProcula GlienManuela BogdanowRolf FimmersAndreas HoeftSe-Chan KimDaniel GrigutschBACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the German version differs from the English version with respect to presentation diagrams and change indicators, which have a significant impact on the category assigned. This investigation offers a preliminary assessment in terms of validity and inter-rater reliability of the German MTS. METHODS: Construct validity of assigned MTS level was assessed based on comparisons to hospitalization (general / intensive care), mortality, ED and hospital length of stay, level of prehospital care and number of invasive diagnostics. A sample of 45,469 patients was used. Inter-rater agreement between an expert and triage nurses (reliability) was calculated separately for a subset group of 167 emergency patients. RESULTS: For general hospital admission the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.749; for admission to ICU it was 0.871. An examination of MTS-level and number of deceased patients showed that the higher the priority derived from MTS, the higher the number of deaths (p<0.0001 / χ² Test). There was a substantial difference in the 30-day survival among the 5 MTS categories (p<0.0001 / log-rank test).The AUC for the predict 30-day mortality was 0.613. Categories orange and red had the highest numbers of heart catheter and endoscopy. Category red and orange were mostly accompanied by an emergency physician, whereas categories blue and green were walk-in patients. Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was almost perfect (κ = 0.954). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MTS is a reliable and valid instrument for a first assessment of emergency patients in the emergency department.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3933424?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ingo Gräff
Bernd Goldschmidt
Procula Glien
Manuela Bogdanow
Rolf Fimmers
Andreas Hoeft
Se-Chan Kim
Daniel Grigutsch
spellingShingle Ingo Gräff
Bernd Goldschmidt
Procula Glien
Manuela Bogdanow
Rolf Fimmers
Andreas Hoeft
Se-Chan Kim
Daniel Grigutsch
The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ingo Gräff
Bernd Goldschmidt
Procula Glien
Manuela Bogdanow
Rolf Fimmers
Andreas Hoeft
Se-Chan Kim
Daniel Grigutsch
author_sort Ingo Gräff
title The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.
title_short The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.
title_full The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.
title_fullStr The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.
title_full_unstemmed The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.
title_sort german version of the manchester triage system and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the German version differs from the English version with respect to presentation diagrams and change indicators, which have a significant impact on the category assigned. This investigation offers a preliminary assessment in terms of validity and inter-rater reliability of the German MTS. METHODS: Construct validity of assigned MTS level was assessed based on comparisons to hospitalization (general / intensive care), mortality, ED and hospital length of stay, level of prehospital care and number of invasive diagnostics. A sample of 45,469 patients was used. Inter-rater agreement between an expert and triage nurses (reliability) was calculated separately for a subset group of 167 emergency patients. RESULTS: For general hospital admission the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.749; for admission to ICU it was 0.871. An examination of MTS-level and number of deceased patients showed that the higher the priority derived from MTS, the higher the number of deaths (p<0.0001 / χ² Test). There was a substantial difference in the 30-day survival among the 5 MTS categories (p<0.0001 / log-rank test).The AUC for the predict 30-day mortality was 0.613. Categories orange and red had the highest numbers of heart catheter and endoscopy. Category red and orange were mostly accompanied by an emergency physician, whereas categories blue and green were walk-in patients. Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was almost perfect (κ = 0.954). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MTS is a reliable and valid instrument for a first assessment of emergency patients in the emergency department.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3933424?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ingograff thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT berndgoldschmidt thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT proculaglien thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT manuelabogdanow thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT rolffimmers thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT andreashoeft thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT sechankim thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT danielgrigutsch thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT ingograff germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT berndgoldschmidt germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT proculaglien germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT manuelabogdanow germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT rolffimmers germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT andreashoeft germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT sechankim germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT danielgrigutsch germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
_version_ 1724983007138283520