A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2571 |
id |
doaj-90b280a16d4440f086a70f5f0f76a21b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-90b280a16d4440f086a70f5f0f76a21b2020-11-25T03:09:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-08-0192571257110.3390/jcm9082571A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac EchocardiographyCarlo Caiati0Giovanni Luzzi1Paolo Pollice2Stefano Favale3Mario Erminio Lepera4Unit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyBackground: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2571ghostsintracardiac echocardiographylead infectionlead encapsulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carlo Caiati Giovanni Luzzi Paolo Pollice Stefano Favale Mario Erminio Lepera |
spellingShingle |
Carlo Caiati Giovanni Luzzi Paolo Pollice Stefano Favale Mario Erminio Lepera A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography Journal of Clinical Medicine ghosts intracardiac echocardiography lead infection lead encapsulation |
author_facet |
Carlo Caiati Giovanni Luzzi Paolo Pollice Stefano Favale Mario Erminio Lepera |
author_sort |
Carlo Caiati |
title |
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_short |
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_full |
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_fullStr |
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_sort |
novel clinical perspective on new masses after lead extraction (ghosts) by means of intracardiac echocardiography |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC. |
topic |
ghosts intracardiac echocardiography lead infection lead encapsulation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2571 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carlocaiati anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT giovanniluzzi anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT paolopollice anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT stefanofavale anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT marioerminiolepera anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT carlocaiati novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT giovanniluzzi novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT paolopollice novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT stefanofavale novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT marioerminiolepera novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography |
_version_ |
1724662356781301760 |