A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography

Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlo Caiati, Giovanni Luzzi, Paolo Pollice, Stefano Favale, Mario Erminio Lepera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2571
id doaj-90b280a16d4440f086a70f5f0f76a21b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90b280a16d4440f086a70f5f0f76a21b2020-11-25T03:09:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-08-0192571257110.3390/jcm9082571A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac EchocardiographyCarlo Caiati0Giovanni Luzzi1Paolo Pollice2Stefano Favale3Mario Erminio Lepera4Unit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyUnit of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70123 Bari, ItalyBackground: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2571ghostsintracardiac echocardiographylead infectionlead encapsulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlo Caiati
Giovanni Luzzi
Paolo Pollice
Stefano Favale
Mario Erminio Lepera
spellingShingle Carlo Caiati
Giovanni Luzzi
Paolo Pollice
Stefano Favale
Mario Erminio Lepera
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
Journal of Clinical Medicine
ghosts
intracardiac echocardiography
lead infection
lead encapsulation
author_facet Carlo Caiati
Giovanni Luzzi
Paolo Pollice
Stefano Favale
Mario Erminio Lepera
author_sort Carlo Caiati
title A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_short A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_full A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_fullStr A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_sort novel clinical perspective on new masses after lead extraction (ghosts) by means of intracardiac echocardiography
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC.
topic ghosts
intracardiac echocardiography
lead infection
lead encapsulation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2571
work_keys_str_mv AT carlocaiati anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT giovanniluzzi anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT paolopollice anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT stefanofavale anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT marioerminiolepera anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT carlocaiati novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT giovanniluzzi novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT paolopollice novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT stefanofavale novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT marioerminiolepera novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
_version_ 1724662356781301760