Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma

Objective To study whether clinicians who treat glaucoma are interested in using clinical decision support (CDS) tools for glaucoma, what glaucoma clinical decisions they feel would benefit from CDS, and what characteristics of CDS design they feel would be important in glaucoma clinical practice.Me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mollie Cummins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-01
Series:BMJ Open Ophthalmology
Online Access:https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000639.full
id doaj-90ade33032c34bda8eb943c7bcdfbb37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90ade33032c34bda8eb943c7bcdfbb372021-07-28T12:30:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Ophthalmology2397-32692021-07-016110.1136/bmjophth-2020-000639Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucomaMollie Cummins0College of Nursing, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USAObjective To study whether clinicians who treat glaucoma are interested in using clinical decision support (CDS) tools for glaucoma, what glaucoma clinical decisions they feel would benefit from CDS, and what characteristics of CDS design they feel would be important in glaucoma clinical practice.Methods and analysis Working with the American Glaucoma Society, the Utah Ophthalmology Society and the Utah Optometric Association, we identified a group of clinicians who care for patients with glaucoma. We asked these clinicians about interest in CDS, what glaucoma clinical decisions would benefit from CDS, and what characteristics of CDS tool design would be important in glaucoma clinical practice.Results Of the 105 clinicians (31 optometrists, 10 general ophthalmologists and 64 glaucoma specialists), 93 (88.6%) were either ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ interested in using CDS for glaucoma. There were no statistically significant differences in interest between clinical specialties (p=0.12), years in practice (p=0.85) or numbers of patients seen daily (p=0.99). Identifying progression of glaucoma was the clinical decision the largest number of clinicians felt would benefit from CDS (104/105, 99.1%). An easy to use interface was the CDS characteristic the largest number of clinicians felt would be ‘very important’ (93/105, 88.6%).Conclusion Of this group of clinicians who treat glaucoma, 88.6% were interested in using CDS for glaucoma and 99.1% felt that identification of glaucomatous progression could benefit from CDS. This level of interest supports future work to develop CDS for glaucoma.https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000639.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mollie Cummins
spellingShingle Mollie Cummins
Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
author_facet Mollie Cummins
author_sort Mollie Cummins
title Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma
title_short Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma
title_full Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma
title_fullStr Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma
title_sort interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Ophthalmology
issn 2397-3269
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Objective To study whether clinicians who treat glaucoma are interested in using clinical decision support (CDS) tools for glaucoma, what glaucoma clinical decisions they feel would benefit from CDS, and what characteristics of CDS design they feel would be important in glaucoma clinical practice.Methods and analysis Working with the American Glaucoma Society, the Utah Ophthalmology Society and the Utah Optometric Association, we identified a group of clinicians who care for patients with glaucoma. We asked these clinicians about interest in CDS, what glaucoma clinical decisions would benefit from CDS, and what characteristics of CDS tool design would be important in glaucoma clinical practice.Results Of the 105 clinicians (31 optometrists, 10 general ophthalmologists and 64 glaucoma specialists), 93 (88.6%) were either ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ interested in using CDS for glaucoma. There were no statistically significant differences in interest between clinical specialties (p=0.12), years in practice (p=0.85) or numbers of patients seen daily (p=0.99). Identifying progression of glaucoma was the clinical decision the largest number of clinicians felt would benefit from CDS (104/105, 99.1%). An easy to use interface was the CDS characteristic the largest number of clinicians felt would be ‘very important’ (93/105, 88.6%).Conclusion Of this group of clinicians who treat glaucoma, 88.6% were interested in using CDS for glaucoma and 99.1% felt that identification of glaucomatous progression could benefit from CDS. This level of interest supports future work to develop CDS for glaucoma.
url https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000639.full
work_keys_str_mv AT molliecummins interestsandneedsofeyecareprovidersinclinicaldecisionsupportforglaucoma
_version_ 1721278694850297856