Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way
Is there really an atmospheric turn? The concept of “atmosphere” as a qualitative-emotional prius of sensory experience seems today to have encouraged the convergence of many interdisciplinary studies focused on the qualitative aspects of our “surroundings”. Based on the neo-phenomenological theory...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Open Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0031/opphil-2019-0031.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-90aaf9ec31cb4289a3ce3383c6fb2d5b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-90aaf9ec31cb4289a3ce3383c6fb2d5b2021-01-10T14:30:51ZengDe GruyterOpen Philosophy2543-88752019-10-012141442710.1515/opphil-2019-0031opphil-2019-0031Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric WayGriffero Tonino0University of Rome “Tor Vergata”Rome, ItalyIs there really an atmospheric turn? The concept of “atmosphere” as a qualitative-emotional prius of sensory experience seems today to have encouraged the convergence of many interdisciplinary studies focused on the qualitative aspects of our “surroundings”. Based on the neo-phenomenological theory of atmospheric perception as a first pathivc impression and a felt-bodily communication, this paper explores and synthesises the relationship between atmospheres and expressive qualities. It thus clarifies the key features of a general “pathic” aesthetics. It considers perceivers as beings who are touched by atmospheric feelings in emotional and tactile ways. These are widespread and vary in their modulation of lived space. They are also ontologically rooted in things and quasi-things of the lifeworld. By realising how they (especially in an unintentional way) expose themselves to what happens, perceivers turn out not to be “subjects of something” but rather “subjects to something”: that is, human beings who are only “sovereign” when they are free, at least in their daily experience, from the dogma of rational and methodological autonomy imposed by Western Modernity.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0031/opphil-2019-0031.xml?format=INTatmospheresquasi-thingspathicityfelt bodyaffordancespresentnessresonance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Griffero Tonino |
spellingShingle |
Griffero Tonino Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way Open Philosophy atmospheres quasi-things pathicity felt body affordances presentness resonance |
author_facet |
Griffero Tonino |
author_sort |
Griffero Tonino |
title |
Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way |
title_short |
Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way |
title_full |
Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way |
title_fullStr |
Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way |
title_sort |
pathicity: experiencing the world in an atmospheric way |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Philosophy |
issn |
2543-8875 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Is there really an atmospheric turn? The concept of “atmosphere” as a qualitative-emotional prius of sensory experience seems today to have encouraged the convergence of many interdisciplinary studies focused on the qualitative aspects of our “surroundings”. Based on the neo-phenomenological theory of atmospheric perception as a first pathivc impression and a felt-bodily communication, this paper explores and synthesises the relationship between atmospheres and expressive qualities. It thus clarifies the key features of a general “pathic” aesthetics. It considers perceivers as beings who are touched by atmospheric feelings in emotional and tactile ways. These are widespread and vary in their modulation of lived space. They are also ontologically rooted in things and quasi-things of the lifeworld. By realising how they (especially in an unintentional way) expose themselves to what happens, perceivers turn out not to be “subjects of something” but rather “subjects to something”: that is, human beings who are only “sovereign” when they are free, at least in their daily experience, from the dogma of rational and methodological autonomy imposed by Western Modernity. |
topic |
atmospheres quasi-things pathicity felt body affordances presentness resonance |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0031/opphil-2019-0031.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT grifferotonino pathicityexperiencingtheworldinanatmosphericway |
_version_ |
1724341778554814464 |