Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way

Is there really an atmospheric turn? The concept of “atmosphere” as a qualitative-emotional prius of sensory experience seems today to have encouraged the convergence of many interdisciplinary studies focused on the qualitative aspects of our “surroundings”. Based on the neo-phenomenological theory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Griffero Tonino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-10-01
Series:Open Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0031/opphil-2019-0031.xml?format=INT
id doaj-90aaf9ec31cb4289a3ce3383c6fb2d5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90aaf9ec31cb4289a3ce3383c6fb2d5b2021-01-10T14:30:51ZengDe GruyterOpen Philosophy2543-88752019-10-012141442710.1515/opphil-2019-0031opphil-2019-0031Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric WayGriffero Tonino0University of Rome “Tor Vergata”Rome, ItalyIs there really an atmospheric turn? The concept of “atmosphere” as a qualitative-emotional prius of sensory experience seems today to have encouraged the convergence of many interdisciplinary studies focused on the qualitative aspects of our “surroundings”. Based on the neo-phenomenological theory of atmospheric perception as a first pathivc impression and a felt-bodily communication, this paper explores and synthesises the relationship between atmospheres and expressive qualities. It thus clarifies the key features of a general “pathic” aesthetics. It considers perceivers as beings who are touched by atmospheric feelings in emotional and tactile ways. These are widespread and vary in their modulation of lived space. They are also ontologically rooted in things and quasi-things of the lifeworld. By realising how they (especially in an unintentional way) expose themselves to what happens, perceivers turn out not to be “subjects of something” but rather “subjects to something”: that is, human beings who are only “sovereign” when they are free, at least in their daily experience, from the dogma of rational and methodological autonomy imposed by Western Modernity.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0031/opphil-2019-0031.xml?format=INTatmospheresquasi-thingspathicityfelt bodyaffordancespresentnessresonance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Griffero Tonino
spellingShingle Griffero Tonino
Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way
Open Philosophy
atmospheres
quasi-things
pathicity
felt body
affordances
presentness
resonance
author_facet Griffero Tonino
author_sort Griffero Tonino
title Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way
title_short Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way
title_full Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way
title_fullStr Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way
title_full_unstemmed Pathicity: Experiencing the World in an Atmospheric Way
title_sort pathicity: experiencing the world in an atmospheric way
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Philosophy
issn 2543-8875
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Is there really an atmospheric turn? The concept of “atmosphere” as a qualitative-emotional prius of sensory experience seems today to have encouraged the convergence of many interdisciplinary studies focused on the qualitative aspects of our “surroundings”. Based on the neo-phenomenological theory of atmospheric perception as a first pathivc impression and a felt-bodily communication, this paper explores and synthesises the relationship between atmospheres and expressive qualities. It thus clarifies the key features of a general “pathic” aesthetics. It considers perceivers as beings who are touched by atmospheric feelings in emotional and tactile ways. These are widespread and vary in their modulation of lived space. They are also ontologically rooted in things and quasi-things of the lifeworld. By realising how they (especially in an unintentional way) expose themselves to what happens, perceivers turn out not to be “subjects of something” but rather “subjects to something”: that is, human beings who are only “sovereign” when they are free, at least in their daily experience, from the dogma of rational and methodological autonomy imposed by Western Modernity.
topic atmospheres
quasi-things
pathicity
felt body
affordances
presentness
resonance
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0031/opphil-2019-0031.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT grifferotonino pathicityexperiencingtheworldinanatmosphericway
_version_ 1724341778554814464