Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences

According to an influential epistemological tradition, science explains phenomena on the basis of laws, but the last two decades have witnessed a neo-mechanistic movement that emphasizes the fundamental role of mechanism-based explanations in science, which have the virtue of opening the “black box”...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sampaio Rui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-06-01
Series:Kairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0004
id doaj-909cce6ce2ae40e886257c5cf9153c44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-909cce6ce2ae40e886257c5cf9153c442021-09-05T21:02:08ZengSciendoKairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science1647-659X2018-06-01201648810.2478/kjps-2018-0004kjps-2018-0004Laws and Mechanisms in The Human SciencesSampaio Rui0Faculty of Human and Social Sciences of the University of the AzoresAccording to an influential epistemological tradition, science explains phenomena on the basis of laws, but the last two decades have witnessed a neo-mechanistic movement that emphasizes the fundamental role of mechanism-based explanations in science, which have the virtue of opening the “black box” of correlations and of providing a genuine understanding of the phenomena. Mechanisms enrich the empirical content of a theory by introducing a new set of variables, helping us to make causal inferences that are not possible on the basis of macro-level correlations (due to well-known problems regarding the underdetermination of causation by correlation). However, the appeal to mechanisms has also a methodological price. They are vulnerable to interference effects; they also face underdetermination problems, because the available evidence often allows different interpretations of the underlying structure of a correlation; they are strongly context-dependent and their individuation as causal patterns can be controversial; they present specific testability problems; finally, mechanism-based extrapolations can be misleading due to the local character of mechanisms. At any rate, the study of mechanisms is an indispensable part of the human sciences, and the problems that they raise can be controlled by quantitative and qualitative methods, and an epistemologically informed exercise of critical thinking.https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0004lawsmechanismscausalityreductionismhuman sciences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sampaio Rui
spellingShingle Sampaio Rui
Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences
Kairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science
laws
mechanisms
causality
reductionism
human sciences
author_facet Sampaio Rui
author_sort Sampaio Rui
title Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences
title_short Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences
title_full Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences
title_fullStr Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences
title_full_unstemmed Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences
title_sort laws and mechanisms in the human sciences
publisher Sciendo
series Kairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science
issn 1647-659X
publishDate 2018-06-01
description According to an influential epistemological tradition, science explains phenomena on the basis of laws, but the last two decades have witnessed a neo-mechanistic movement that emphasizes the fundamental role of mechanism-based explanations in science, which have the virtue of opening the “black box” of correlations and of providing a genuine understanding of the phenomena. Mechanisms enrich the empirical content of a theory by introducing a new set of variables, helping us to make causal inferences that are not possible on the basis of macro-level correlations (due to well-known problems regarding the underdetermination of causation by correlation). However, the appeal to mechanisms has also a methodological price. They are vulnerable to interference effects; they also face underdetermination problems, because the available evidence often allows different interpretations of the underlying structure of a correlation; they are strongly context-dependent and their individuation as causal patterns can be controversial; they present specific testability problems; finally, mechanism-based extrapolations can be misleading due to the local character of mechanisms. At any rate, the study of mechanisms is an indispensable part of the human sciences, and the problems that they raise can be controlled by quantitative and qualitative methods, and an epistemologically informed exercise of critical thinking.
topic laws
mechanisms
causality
reductionism
human sciences
url https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT sampaiorui lawsandmechanismsinthehumansciences
_version_ 1717781274643398656