Seismic hazard versus design accelerograms
The developments presented herewith arise from the legitimate wish and task of structural engineers of performing consistent analyses of risk and safety for works located in seismic regions. The paper adopts a probabilistic viewpoint, or philosophy. The starting point of this discussion is based on...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National R&D Institute URBAN-INCERC, INCERC Bucharest Branch
2012-07-01
|
Series: | Constructii: Journal of Civil Engineering Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://constructii.incerc2004.ro/Archive/2012-1/Constructii_2012_Vol.13_No.1_ID2012130101.pdf |
id |
doaj-908d0d87dfa74574ae5eaa093598380e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-908d0d87dfa74574ae5eaa093598380e2020-11-25T00:32:52ZengNational R&D Institute URBAN-INCERC, INCERC Bucharest BranchConstructii: Journal of Civil Engineering Research1221-27092247-03282012-07-01131325Seismic hazard versus design accelerogramsHorea SANDIThe developments presented herewith arise from the legitimate wish and task of structural engineers of performing consistent analyses of risk and safety for works located in seismic regions. The paper adopts a probabilistic viewpoint, or philosophy. The starting point of this discussion is based on well – established approaches, while at the same time addressing specific research problems that could represent the task of the future, even if not an immediate one. The main topics are as follows: a brief view of (3-rd level) probabilistic safety and risk analysis, based on simplifying assumptions, which serves as a starting point for subsequent developments; a review of seismic action and hazard representation from two perspectives: ground motion during one event (advocating design accelerograms and stochastic models) and recurrence of successive events (considering, after the usual 1D approach, a generalized approach based on the consideration of a multi-dimensional space of characteristic action parameters); the development of a multi-dimensional stochastic model of ground motion (basically for a half-space consisting of successive horizontal homogeneous layers); a brief discussion of alternative possible objectives of engineering safety analyses.http://constructii.incerc2004.ro/Archive/2012-1/Constructii_2012_Vol.13_No.1_ID2012130101.pdfseismic actionseismic hazardseismic riskstochastic modelsdesign strategies |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Horea SANDI |
spellingShingle |
Horea SANDI Seismic hazard versus design accelerograms Constructii: Journal of Civil Engineering Research seismic action seismic hazard seismic risk stochastic models design strategies |
author_facet |
Horea SANDI |
author_sort |
Horea SANDI |
title |
Seismic hazard versus design accelerograms |
title_short |
Seismic hazard versus design accelerograms |
title_full |
Seismic hazard versus design accelerograms |
title_fullStr |
Seismic hazard versus design accelerograms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seismic hazard versus design accelerograms |
title_sort |
seismic hazard versus design accelerograms |
publisher |
National R&D Institute URBAN-INCERC, INCERC Bucharest Branch |
series |
Constructii: Journal of Civil Engineering Research |
issn |
1221-2709 2247-0328 |
publishDate |
2012-07-01 |
description |
The developments presented herewith arise from the legitimate wish and task of structural engineers of performing consistent analyses of risk and safety for works located in seismic regions. The paper adopts a probabilistic viewpoint, or philosophy. The starting point of this discussion is based on well – established approaches, while at the same time addressing specific research problems that could represent the task of the future, even if not an immediate one. The main topics are as follows: a brief view of (3-rd level) probabilistic safety and risk analysis, based on simplifying assumptions, which serves as a starting point for subsequent developments; a review of seismic action and hazard representation from two perspectives: ground motion during one event (advocating design accelerograms and stochastic models) and recurrence of successive events (considering, after the usual 1D approach, a generalized approach based on the consideration of a multi-dimensional space of characteristic action parameters); the development of a multi-dimensional stochastic model of ground motion (basically for a half-space consisting of successive horizontal homogeneous layers); a brief discussion of alternative possible objectives of engineering safety analyses. |
topic |
seismic action seismic hazard seismic risk stochastic models design strategies |
url |
http://constructii.incerc2004.ro/Archive/2012-1/Constructii_2012_Vol.13_No.1_ID2012130101.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT horeasandi seismichazardversusdesignaccelerograms |
_version_ |
1725318689653260288 |