Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study

In this paper, we look at the challenge of optimizing survey layout in online research to enable multi-device use. Several studies provide useful advice on target-oriented implementation of web design for CAWI surveys. This paper presents results of the implementation of a new adapted design at the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Birgit Arn, Stefan Klug, Janusz Kolodziejski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim 2015-12-01
Series:Methoden, Daten, Analysen
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mda.gesis.org/index.php/mda/article/view/2015.011/41
id doaj-907b0997e2ad44548849d8bda67d9c17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-907b0997e2ad44548849d8bda67d9c172020-11-24T23:11:21ZengGESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, MannheimMethoden, Daten, Analysen1864-69562190-49362015-12-019218521310.12758/mda.2015.011Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case StudyBirgit Arn0Stefan Klug1Janusz Kolodziejski2DemoSCOPEDemoSCOPEDemoSCOPEIn this paper, we look at the challenge of optimizing survey layout in online research to enable multi-device use. Several studies provide useful advice on target-oriented implementation of web design for CAWI surveys. This paper presents results of the implementation of a new adapted design at the panel of DemoSCOPE that allows the participants to take part in a survey on multiple (especially mobile) devices. To evaluate this adapted design, we compare interview data and question timing of panellists who participated in an insurance study before and after the design transition. Central key figures concerning the completion rate, item non-response, open questions, straightlining, timing of single questions and the length of the total interview are presented. In addition, we have presented examples of both old and new design to the community and invited them to assess these examples concerning orientation, color, design and usability. We evaluate the differences in these assessments before and after the design transition for smartphone and desktop users. We end with suggestions for best practice for online studies on different devices.https://mda.gesis.org/index.php/mda/article/view/2015.011/41CAWI surveysdesign guidelinessimplicitytile design
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Birgit Arn
Stefan Klug
Janusz Kolodziejski
spellingShingle Birgit Arn
Stefan Klug
Janusz Kolodziejski
Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study
Methoden, Daten, Analysen
CAWI surveys
design guidelines
simplicity
tile design
author_facet Birgit Arn
Stefan Klug
Janusz Kolodziejski
author_sort Birgit Arn
title Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study
title_short Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study
title_full Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study
title_sort evaluation of an adapted design in a multi-device online panel: a demoscope case study
publisher GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim
series Methoden, Daten, Analysen
issn 1864-6956
2190-4936
publishDate 2015-12-01
description In this paper, we look at the challenge of optimizing survey layout in online research to enable multi-device use. Several studies provide useful advice on target-oriented implementation of web design for CAWI surveys. This paper presents results of the implementation of a new adapted design at the panel of DemoSCOPE that allows the participants to take part in a survey on multiple (especially mobile) devices. To evaluate this adapted design, we compare interview data and question timing of panellists who participated in an insurance study before and after the design transition. Central key figures concerning the completion rate, item non-response, open questions, straightlining, timing of single questions and the length of the total interview are presented. In addition, we have presented examples of both old and new design to the community and invited them to assess these examples concerning orientation, color, design and usability. We evaluate the differences in these assessments before and after the design transition for smartphone and desktop users. We end with suggestions for best practice for online studies on different devices.
topic CAWI surveys
design guidelines
simplicity
tile design
url https://mda.gesis.org/index.php/mda/article/view/2015.011/41
work_keys_str_mv AT birgitarn evaluationofanadapteddesigninamultideviceonlinepanelademoscopecasestudy
AT stefanklug evaluationofanadapteddesigninamultideviceonlinepanelademoscopecasestudy
AT januszkolodziejski evaluationofanadapteddesigninamultideviceonlinepanelademoscopecasestudy
_version_ 1725604843001741312