'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter Ong

This article investigates whether there is a theoretical framework for the notion of oral literature that is common to both oral theory and literary theory. The notion of oral literature has, within oral theory, generally been put to an anthropological - rather than literary - use. Because of partic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. Alant
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 1996-04-01
Series:Literator
Online Access:https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/609
id doaj-907622b4668545baa3b3500bd7a19fa6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-907622b4668545baa3b3500bd7a19fa62020-11-24T23:42:24ZafrAOSISLiterator0258-22792219-82371996-04-0117211713010.4102/lit.v17i2.609548'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter OngJ. Alant0Department of Modern European Languages (French Section), University of Durban-WestvilleThis article investigates whether there is a theoretical framework for the notion of oral literature that is common to both oral theory and literary theory. The notion of oral literature has, within oral theory, generally been put to an anthropological - rather than literary - use. Because of particular difficulties involved with the appreciation of the textual properties of the oral text, a modernist approach proves unsatisfactory. A solution for the theoretical difficulty of integrating oral literature into literary theory is sought via a particular post-modernist view of literature, namely Anthony Easthope’s reconceptualisation of literary studies as study of signifying practice ("cultural studies") open to both literary and popular texts. Given the exclusivity of the notion of popular culture, centred on misconceptions relating to the constructedness of the oral text, the notion of oral literature continues, however, to operate in a theoretical void.https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/609
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Alant
spellingShingle J. Alant
'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter Ong
Literator
author_facet J. Alant
author_sort J. Alant
title 'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter Ong
title_short 'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter Ong
title_full 'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter Ong
title_fullStr 'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter Ong
title_full_unstemmed 'Did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked Walter Ong
title_sort 'did you say <i>oral literature</i>?' asked walter ong
publisher AOSIS
series Literator
issn 0258-2279
2219-8237
publishDate 1996-04-01
description This article investigates whether there is a theoretical framework for the notion of oral literature that is common to both oral theory and literary theory. The notion of oral literature has, within oral theory, generally been put to an anthropological - rather than literary - use. Because of particular difficulties involved with the appreciation of the textual properties of the oral text, a modernist approach proves unsatisfactory. A solution for the theoretical difficulty of integrating oral literature into literary theory is sought via a particular post-modernist view of literature, namely Anthony Easthope’s reconceptualisation of literary studies as study of signifying practice ("cultural studies") open to both literary and popular texts. Given the exclusivity of the notion of popular culture, centred on misconceptions relating to the constructedness of the oral text, the notion of oral literature continues, however, to operate in a theoretical void.
url https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/609
work_keys_str_mv AT jalant didyousayioralliteratureiaskedwalterong
_version_ 1725504681554214912