Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature

There is a need to better understand contemporary issues of nomenclature and group construction around people with intersex variations shaping health research and practices—including their framing within concepts like disorders of sex development (DSD), intersex, or the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tiffany Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-05-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017745577
id doaj-90702540116f47ceb063c87d4771d3f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90702540116f47ceb063c87d4771d3f42020-11-25T03:19:21ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402018-05-01810.1177/2158244017745577Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health LiteratureTiffany Jones0Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaThere is a need to better understand contemporary issues of nomenclature and group construction around people with intersex variations shaping health research and practices—including their framing within concepts like disorders of sex development (DSD), intersex, or the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) umbrella. This article reviews health literature in the broad field of Intersex Studies since 2015. It outlines the contexts, theoretical lenses, methods and participant numbers, framing of participants, and health findings around interventions evident in 61 sources. Sources came from the African region, American Canadian region, Asia-Pacific region, European region, and the Middle East. While health-related work was largely found in medical journals, it was also located in publications focused on a range of other fields including, for example, bioethics, education, and legal studies. The piece discusses the tensions between institutional expert-centered work with a traditional clinical/medical lens and the arguments found in a range of other patient-centered, community group–centered, and theory-centered sources applying innovative perspectives onto key issues. Liberal Constructivist, Bioethical Narrative Inquiry, Critical Intersex Studies, and Critical LGBTI Liberationist lenses have introduced a range of methods (from autobiographical analyses through to large-scale online surveys) to questions of the need for and processes of certain health care interventions and norms in the treatment of patients with intersex variations. Problematic practices in clinical health care and research are identified and discussed: particularly the lack of adequate information dissemination and consent-gleaning in areas ranging from anatomical photography through to application of “corrective” genital surgeries.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017745577
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tiffany Jones
spellingShingle Tiffany Jones
Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature
SAGE Open
author_facet Tiffany Jones
author_sort Tiffany Jones
title Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature
title_short Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature
title_full Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature
title_fullStr Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature
title_full_unstemmed Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature
title_sort intersex studies: a systematic review of international health literature
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2018-05-01
description There is a need to better understand contemporary issues of nomenclature and group construction around people with intersex variations shaping health research and practices—including their framing within concepts like disorders of sex development (DSD), intersex, or the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) umbrella. This article reviews health literature in the broad field of Intersex Studies since 2015. It outlines the contexts, theoretical lenses, methods and participant numbers, framing of participants, and health findings around interventions evident in 61 sources. Sources came from the African region, American Canadian region, Asia-Pacific region, European region, and the Middle East. While health-related work was largely found in medical journals, it was also located in publications focused on a range of other fields including, for example, bioethics, education, and legal studies. The piece discusses the tensions between institutional expert-centered work with a traditional clinical/medical lens and the arguments found in a range of other patient-centered, community group–centered, and theory-centered sources applying innovative perspectives onto key issues. Liberal Constructivist, Bioethical Narrative Inquiry, Critical Intersex Studies, and Critical LGBTI Liberationist lenses have introduced a range of methods (from autobiographical analyses through to large-scale online surveys) to questions of the need for and processes of certain health care interventions and norms in the treatment of patients with intersex variations. Problematic practices in clinical health care and research are identified and discussed: particularly the lack of adequate information dissemination and consent-gleaning in areas ranging from anatomical photography through to application of “corrective” genital surgeries.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017745577
work_keys_str_mv AT tiffanyjones intersexstudiesasystematicreviewofinternationalhealthliterature
_version_ 1724622902315188224