Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority

Media representations of Muslims in Britain have often disappointed both faith practitioners and scholars. Imputed failings include distorting beliefs or practices, essentialising the faith, and amplifying voices that are not representative of Islam. This last factor hinges on questions of authority...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael B. Munnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/7/435
id doaj-90702184f36343c9a7da61fa7964f3d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90702184f36343c9a7da61fa7964f3d12020-11-24T21:27:37ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-07-0110743510.3390/rel10070435rel10070435Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of AuthorityMichael B. Munnik0Centre for the Study of Islam in the UK, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UKMedia representations of Muslims in Britain have often disappointed both faith practitioners and scholars. Imputed failings include distorting beliefs or practices, essentialising the faith, and amplifying voices that are not representative of Islam. This last factor hinges on questions of authority: what journalists and Muslims recognise as authority can differ in important ways. Drawing on studies of journalism practice, prior professional experience, and ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative interviews in Scotland, I discuss the conventional preference among journalists for “official sources” and the problems this can present in terms of hierarchy in Islam. I contrast this with a less-studied imperative, also present in newsrooms, for “real people”. This category matches well with Islam’s decentralised tradition and presents an opportunity to understand how different kinds of sources are presented in media coverage. It is possible for journalists to ensure that these differing claims to authority are represented properly, though this requires knowledge and responsibility.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/7/435Muslims in Britainauthorityjournalismjournalist-source relationsrepresentationcivic journalismqualitative methods
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael B. Munnik
spellingShingle Michael B. Munnik
Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority
Religions
Muslims in Britain
authority
journalism
journalist-source relations
representation
civic journalism
qualitative methods
author_facet Michael B. Munnik
author_sort Michael B. Munnik
title Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority
title_short Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority
title_full Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority
title_fullStr Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority
title_full_unstemmed Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority
title_sort answering for islam: journalistic and islamic conceptions of authority
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Media representations of Muslims in Britain have often disappointed both faith practitioners and scholars. Imputed failings include distorting beliefs or practices, essentialising the faith, and amplifying voices that are not representative of Islam. This last factor hinges on questions of authority: what journalists and Muslims recognise as authority can differ in important ways. Drawing on studies of journalism practice, prior professional experience, and ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative interviews in Scotland, I discuss the conventional preference among journalists for “official sources” and the problems this can present in terms of hierarchy in Islam. I contrast this with a less-studied imperative, also present in newsrooms, for “real people”. This category matches well with Islam’s decentralised tradition and presents an opportunity to understand how different kinds of sources are presented in media coverage. It is possible for journalists to ensure that these differing claims to authority are represented properly, though this requires knowledge and responsibility.
topic Muslims in Britain
authority
journalism
journalist-source relations
representation
civic journalism
qualitative methods
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/7/435
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelbmunnik answeringforislamjournalisticandislamicconceptionsofauthority
_version_ 1725974497180254208