Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority
Media representations of Muslims in Britain have often disappointed both faith practitioners and scholars. Imputed failings include distorting beliefs or practices, essentialising the faith, and amplifying voices that are not representative of Islam. This last factor hinges on questions of authority...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/7/435 |
id |
doaj-90702184f36343c9a7da61fa7964f3d1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-90702184f36343c9a7da61fa7964f3d12020-11-24T21:27:37ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-07-0110743510.3390/rel10070435rel10070435Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of AuthorityMichael B. Munnik0Centre for the Study of Islam in the UK, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UKMedia representations of Muslims in Britain have often disappointed both faith practitioners and scholars. Imputed failings include distorting beliefs or practices, essentialising the faith, and amplifying voices that are not representative of Islam. This last factor hinges on questions of authority: what journalists and Muslims recognise as authority can differ in important ways. Drawing on studies of journalism practice, prior professional experience, and ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative interviews in Scotland, I discuss the conventional preference among journalists for “official sources” and the problems this can present in terms of hierarchy in Islam. I contrast this with a less-studied imperative, also present in newsrooms, for “real people”. This category matches well with Islam’s decentralised tradition and presents an opportunity to understand how different kinds of sources are presented in media coverage. It is possible for journalists to ensure that these differing claims to authority are represented properly, though this requires knowledge and responsibility.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/7/435Muslims in Britainauthorityjournalismjournalist-source relationsrepresentationcivic journalismqualitative methods |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael B. Munnik |
spellingShingle |
Michael B. Munnik Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority Religions Muslims in Britain authority journalism journalist-source relations representation civic journalism qualitative methods |
author_facet |
Michael B. Munnik |
author_sort |
Michael B. Munnik |
title |
Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority |
title_short |
Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority |
title_full |
Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority |
title_fullStr |
Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority |
title_full_unstemmed |
Answering for Islam: Journalistic and Islamic Conceptions of Authority |
title_sort |
answering for islam: journalistic and islamic conceptions of authority |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Media representations of Muslims in Britain have often disappointed both faith practitioners and scholars. Imputed failings include distorting beliefs or practices, essentialising the faith, and amplifying voices that are not representative of Islam. This last factor hinges on questions of authority: what journalists and Muslims recognise as authority can differ in important ways. Drawing on studies of journalism practice, prior professional experience, and ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative interviews in Scotland, I discuss the conventional preference among journalists for “official sources” and the problems this can present in terms of hierarchy in Islam. I contrast this with a less-studied imperative, also present in newsrooms, for “real people”. This category matches well with Islam’s decentralised tradition and presents an opportunity to understand how different kinds of sources are presented in media coverage. It is possible for journalists to ensure that these differing claims to authority are represented properly, though this requires knowledge and responsibility. |
topic |
Muslims in Britain authority journalism journalist-source relations representation civic journalism qualitative methods |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/7/435 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelbmunnik answeringforislamjournalisticandislamicconceptionsofauthority |
_version_ |
1725974497180254208 |