Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions
Plain English summary Background: Society has to cope with a large burden of health issues. There is need to find solutions to prevent diseases and help individuals live healthier lifestyles. Individual needs and circumstances vary greatly and one size fit all solutions do not tend to work well. Mor...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Research Involvement and Engagement |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9 |
id |
doaj-906e485beb89494d9b1cf1f78b74870c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Calum F. Leask Marlene Sandlund Dawn A. Skelton Teatske M. Altenburg Greet Cardon Mai J. M. Chinapaw Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Maite Verloigne Sebastien F. M. Chastin on behalf of the GrandStand, Safe Step and Teenage Girls on the Move Research Groups |
spellingShingle |
Calum F. Leask Marlene Sandlund Dawn A. Skelton Teatske M. Altenburg Greet Cardon Mai J. M. Chinapaw Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Maite Verloigne Sebastien F. M. Chastin on behalf of the GrandStand, Safe Step and Teenage Girls on the Move Research Groups Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions Research Involvement and Engagement Tailored intervention Co-creation Public health Participation Reflective learning |
author_facet |
Calum F. Leask Marlene Sandlund Dawn A. Skelton Teatske M. Altenburg Greet Cardon Mai J. M. Chinapaw Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Maite Verloigne Sebastien F. M. Chastin on behalf of the GrandStand, Safe Step and Teenage Girls on the Move Research Groups |
author_sort |
Calum F. Leask |
title |
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions |
title_short |
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions |
title_full |
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions |
title_fullStr |
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions |
title_sort |
framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Research Involvement and Engagement |
issn |
2056-7529 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Plain English summary Background: Society has to cope with a large burden of health issues. There is need to find solutions to prevent diseases and help individuals live healthier lifestyles. Individual needs and circumstances vary greatly and one size fit all solutions do not tend to work well. More tailored solutions centred on individuals’ needs and circumstances can be developed in collaboration with these individuals. This process, known as co-creation, has shown promise but it requires guiding principles to improve its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to identify a key set of principles and recommendations for co-creating public health interventions. Methods: These principles were collaboratively developed through analysing a set of case studies targeting different health behaviours (such as reducing sitting and improving strength and balance) in different groups of people (such as adolescent schoolgirls and older adults living in the community). Results: The key principles of co-creation are presented in four stages: Planning (what is the purpose of the co-creation; and who should be involved?); Conducting (what activities can be used during co-creation; and how to ensure buy-in and commitment?); Evaluating (how do we know the process and the outcome are valid and effective?) and Reporting (how to report the findings?). Three models are proposed to show how co-created solutions can be scaled up to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to help the co-creation of public health interventions by providing a framework and governance to guide the process. Abstract Background: Due to the chronic disease burden on society, there is a need for preventive public health interventions to stimulate society towards a healthier lifestyle. To deal with the complex variability between individual lifestyles and settings, collaborating with end-users to develop interventions tailored to their unique circumstances has been suggested as a potential way to improve effectiveness and adherence. Co-creation of public health interventions using participatory methodologies has shown promise but lacks a framework to make this process systematic. The aim of this paper was to identify and set key principles and recommendations for systematically applying participatory methodologies to co-create and evaluate public health interventions. Methods: These principles and recommendations were derived using an iterative reflection process, combining key learning from published literature in addition to critical reflection on three case studies conducted by research groups in three European institutions, all of whom have expertise in co-creating public health interventions using different participatory methodologies. Results: Key principles and recommendations for using participatory methodologies in public health intervention co-creation are presented for the stages of: Planning (framing the aim of the study and identifying the appropriate sampling strategy); Conducting (defining the procedure, in addition to manifesting ownership); Evaluating (the process and the effectiveness) and Reporting (providing guidelines to report the findings). Three scaling models are proposed to demonstrate how to scale locally developed interventions to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to facilitate public health intervention co-creation and evaluation utilising participatory methodologies by ensuring the process is systematic and reproducible. |
topic |
Tailored intervention Co-creation Public health Participation Reflective learning |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT calumfleask frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT marlenesandlund frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT dawnaskelton frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT teatskemaltenburg frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT greetcardon frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT maijmchinapaw frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT ilsedebourdeaudhuij frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT maiteverloigne frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT sebastienfmchastin frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions AT onbehalfofthegrandstandsafestepandteenagegirlsonthemoveresearchgroups frameworkprinciplesandrecommendationsforutilisingparticipatorymethodologiesinthecocreationandevaluationofpublichealthinterventions |
_version_ |
1724849322888003584 |
spelling |
doaj-906e485beb89494d9b1cf1f78b74870c2020-11-25T02:25:57ZengBMCResearch Involvement and Engagement2056-75292019-01-015111610.1186/s40900-018-0136-9Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventionsCalum F. Leask0Marlene Sandlund1Dawn A. Skelton2Teatske M. Altenburg3Greet Cardon4Mai J. M. Chinapaw5Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij6Maite Verloigne7Sebastien F. M. Chastin8on behalf of the GrandStand, Safe Step and Teenage Girls on the Move Research GroupsGlasgow Caledonian University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Applied Health ResearchDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umea UniversityGlasgow Caledonian University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Applied Health ResearchDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityGlasgow Caledonian University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Applied Health ResearchPlain English summary Background: Society has to cope with a large burden of health issues. There is need to find solutions to prevent diseases and help individuals live healthier lifestyles. Individual needs and circumstances vary greatly and one size fit all solutions do not tend to work well. More tailored solutions centred on individuals’ needs and circumstances can be developed in collaboration with these individuals. This process, known as co-creation, has shown promise but it requires guiding principles to improve its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to identify a key set of principles and recommendations for co-creating public health interventions. Methods: These principles were collaboratively developed through analysing a set of case studies targeting different health behaviours (such as reducing sitting and improving strength and balance) in different groups of people (such as adolescent schoolgirls and older adults living in the community). Results: The key principles of co-creation are presented in four stages: Planning (what is the purpose of the co-creation; and who should be involved?); Conducting (what activities can be used during co-creation; and how to ensure buy-in and commitment?); Evaluating (how do we know the process and the outcome are valid and effective?) and Reporting (how to report the findings?). Three models are proposed to show how co-created solutions can be scaled up to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to help the co-creation of public health interventions by providing a framework and governance to guide the process. Abstract Background: Due to the chronic disease burden on society, there is a need for preventive public health interventions to stimulate society towards a healthier lifestyle. To deal with the complex variability between individual lifestyles and settings, collaborating with end-users to develop interventions tailored to their unique circumstances has been suggested as a potential way to improve effectiveness and adherence. Co-creation of public health interventions using participatory methodologies has shown promise but lacks a framework to make this process systematic. The aim of this paper was to identify and set key principles and recommendations for systematically applying participatory methodologies to co-create and evaluate public health interventions. Methods: These principles and recommendations were derived using an iterative reflection process, combining key learning from published literature in addition to critical reflection on three case studies conducted by research groups in three European institutions, all of whom have expertise in co-creating public health interventions using different participatory methodologies. Results: Key principles and recommendations for using participatory methodologies in public health intervention co-creation are presented for the stages of: Planning (framing the aim of the study and identifying the appropriate sampling strategy); Conducting (defining the procedure, in addition to manifesting ownership); Evaluating (the process and the effectiveness) and Reporting (providing guidelines to report the findings). Three scaling models are proposed to demonstrate how to scale locally developed interventions to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to facilitate public health intervention co-creation and evaluation utilising participatory methodologies by ensuring the process is systematic and reproducible.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9Tailored interventionCo-creationPublic healthParticipationReflective learning |