Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation Index

The valuation of ecosystem services has become an integral part of smart urban planning practices. Traditionally designed to bridge ecology and economy through economic language and logic (e.g., goods and services), this conceptual framework has developed into an effective tool for interdisciplinary...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emily C. Hazell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
PCA
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7589
id doaj-905c3e55c3f342088a112ecee2c3c10c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-905c3e55c3f342088a112ecee2c3c10c2020-11-25T03:41:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-09-01127589758910.3390/su12187589Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation IndexEmily C. Hazell0Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B2K3, CanadaThe valuation of ecosystem services has become an integral part of smart urban planning practices. Traditionally designed to bridge ecology and economy through economic language and logic (e.g., goods and services), this conceptual framework has developed into an effective tool for interdisciplinary work. The concept of ecosystem services is used to improve the management of ecosystems for human well-being. However, gaps in how to govern ecological benefits remain. Specifically, identifying which stakeholders benefit the most from the provision of ecosystem services remains largely unaddressed. This study examines the spatial discordance between ecosystem services and the residential stakeholders who may benefit. Using a landscape approach to quantify urban ecosystem services, an area-based composite index was developed for the City of Toronto, Canada, based on the three pillars of sustainability in order to identify potentially vulnerable populations. This method combines the use of principal component analysis (PCA) and spatial multicriteria decision analysis (GIS-MCDA) to combine and weight a select grouping of socioeconomic and ecological indicators. In addition, two sets of enumeration units (i.e., dissemination areas and census tracts) were evaluated to assess the potential impact of measurement scale on subsequent decision or policy outcomes. Results indicate the spatial interdependencies between ecological and socioeconomic processes in an urban setting, offering a unique framework for novel planning and policy intervention strategies. The influence of measurement scale was demonstrated, creating an opportunity to assess an appropriate policy scale by which to measure and evaluate trends over time and space. This approach seeks to provide a flexible and intuitive planning tool that can help to achieve goals relating to urban sustainability, resiliency and equity.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7589ecosystem servicesecosystem benefitsGIS-MCDAPCAsustainability indicators
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily C. Hazell
spellingShingle Emily C. Hazell
Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation Index
Sustainability
ecosystem services
ecosystem benefits
GIS-MCDA
PCA
sustainability indicators
author_facet Emily C. Hazell
author_sort Emily C. Hazell
title Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation Index
title_short Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation Index
title_full Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation Index
title_fullStr Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation Index
title_full_unstemmed Disaggregating Ecosystem Benefits: An Integrated Environmental-Deprivation Index
title_sort disaggregating ecosystem benefits: an integrated environmental-deprivation index
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-09-01
description The valuation of ecosystem services has become an integral part of smart urban planning practices. Traditionally designed to bridge ecology and economy through economic language and logic (e.g., goods and services), this conceptual framework has developed into an effective tool for interdisciplinary work. The concept of ecosystem services is used to improve the management of ecosystems for human well-being. However, gaps in how to govern ecological benefits remain. Specifically, identifying which stakeholders benefit the most from the provision of ecosystem services remains largely unaddressed. This study examines the spatial discordance between ecosystem services and the residential stakeholders who may benefit. Using a landscape approach to quantify urban ecosystem services, an area-based composite index was developed for the City of Toronto, Canada, based on the three pillars of sustainability in order to identify potentially vulnerable populations. This method combines the use of principal component analysis (PCA) and spatial multicriteria decision analysis (GIS-MCDA) to combine and weight a select grouping of socioeconomic and ecological indicators. In addition, two sets of enumeration units (i.e., dissemination areas and census tracts) were evaluated to assess the potential impact of measurement scale on subsequent decision or policy outcomes. Results indicate the spatial interdependencies between ecological and socioeconomic processes in an urban setting, offering a unique framework for novel planning and policy intervention strategies. The influence of measurement scale was demonstrated, creating an opportunity to assess an appropriate policy scale by which to measure and evaluate trends over time and space. This approach seeks to provide a flexible and intuitive planning tool that can help to achieve goals relating to urban sustainability, resiliency and equity.
topic ecosystem services
ecosystem benefits
GIS-MCDA
PCA
sustainability indicators
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7589
work_keys_str_mv AT emilychazell disaggregatingecosystembenefitsanintegratedenvironmentaldeprivationindex
_version_ 1724530243492904960