Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyz...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Nanomaterials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/6/1581 |
id |
doaj-905a7d2672a841528426c5b2c20dd49a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-905a7d2672a841528426c5b2c20dd49a2021-07-01T00:18:15ZengMDPI AGNanomaterials2079-49912021-06-01111581158110.3390/nano11061581Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two MethodsJosé C. Conesa0Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, CSIC, 28049 Madrid, SpainTwo DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyzed in the present work. These methods are compared using several very different semiconductor pairs, and the conclusions about the advantages of each method are discussed. Overall, the alternating slabs method is recommended in those cases where epitaxial mismatch does not represent a significant problem.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/6/1581band alignmenthybrid functionalvacuumepitaxy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
José C. Conesa |
spellingShingle |
José C. Conesa Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods Nanomaterials band alignment hybrid functional vacuum epitaxy |
author_facet |
José C. Conesa |
author_sort |
José C. Conesa |
title |
Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_short |
Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_full |
Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_fullStr |
Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_sort |
computing with dft band offsets at semiconductor interfaces: a comparison of two methods |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nanomaterials |
issn |
2079-4991 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyzed in the present work. These methods are compared using several very different semiconductor pairs, and the conclusions about the advantages of each method are discussed. Overall, the alternating slabs method is recommended in those cases where epitaxial mismatch does not represent a significant problem. |
topic |
band alignment hybrid functional vacuum epitaxy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/6/1581 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josecconesa computingwithdftbandoffsetsatsemiconductorinterfacesacomparisonoftwomethods |
_version_ |
1721348995192717312 |