T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madhumita Shrotri, May C I van Schalkwyk, Nathan Post, Danielle Eddy, Catherine Huntley, David Leeman, Samuel Rigby, Sarah V Williams, William H Bermingham, Paul Kellam, John Maher, Adrian M Shields, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Sharon J Peacock, Sharif A Ismail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532
id doaj-9056c056c2f548e08d1373fccfca17b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9056c056c2f548e08d1373fccfca17b82021-03-04T12:56:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01161e024553210.1371/journal.pone.0245532T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.Madhumita ShrotriMay C I van SchalkwykNathan PostDanielle EddyCatherine HuntleyDavid LeemanSamuel RigbySarah V WilliamsWilliam H BerminghamPaul KellamJohn MaherAdrian M ShieldsGayatri AmirthalingamSharon J PeacockSharif A Ismail<h4>Background</h4>Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06/2020.<h4>Methods</h4>For this systematic review, keyword-structured literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19 Primer. Papers were independently screened by two researchers, with arbitration of disagreements by a third researcher. Data were independently extracted into a pre-designed Excel template and studies critically appraised using a modified version of the MetaQAT tool, with resolution of disagreements by consensus. Findings were narratively synthesised.<h4>Results</h4>61 articles were included. 55 (90%) studies used observational designs, 50 (82%) involved hospitalised patients with higher acuity illness, and the majority had important limitations. Symptomatic adult COVID-19 cases consistently show peripheral T cell lymphopenia, which positively correlates with increased disease severity, duration of RNA positivity, and non-survival; while asymptomatic and paediatric cases display preserved counts. People with severe or critical disease generally develop more robust, virus-specific T cell responses. T cell memory and effector function has been demonstrated against multiple viral epitopes, and, cross-reactive T cell responses have been demonstrated in unexposed and uninfected adults, but the significance for protection and susceptibility, respectively, remains unclear.<h4>Conclusion</h4>A complex pattern of T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been demonstrated, but inferences regarding population level immunity are hampered by significant methodological limitations and heterogeneity between studies, as well as a striking lack of research in asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic individuals. In contrast to antibody responses, population-level surveillance of the T cell response is unlikely to be feasible in the near term. Focused evaluation in specific sub-groups, including vaccine recipients, should be prioritised.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madhumita Shrotri
May C I van Schalkwyk
Nathan Post
Danielle Eddy
Catherine Huntley
David Leeman
Samuel Rigby
Sarah V Williams
William H Bermingham
Paul Kellam
John Maher
Adrian M Shields
Gayatri Amirthalingam
Sharon J Peacock
Sharif A Ismail
spellingShingle Madhumita Shrotri
May C I van Schalkwyk
Nathan Post
Danielle Eddy
Catherine Huntley
David Leeman
Samuel Rigby
Sarah V Williams
William H Bermingham
Paul Kellam
John Maher
Adrian M Shields
Gayatri Amirthalingam
Sharon J Peacock
Sharif A Ismail
T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Madhumita Shrotri
May C I van Schalkwyk
Nathan Post
Danielle Eddy
Catherine Huntley
David Leeman
Samuel Rigby
Sarah V Williams
William H Bermingham
Paul Kellam
John Maher
Adrian M Shields
Gayatri Amirthalingam
Sharon J Peacock
Sharif A Ismail
author_sort Madhumita Shrotri
title T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.
title_short T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.
title_full T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.
title_fullStr T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.
title_sort t cell response to sars-cov-2 infection in humans: a systematic review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06/2020.<h4>Methods</h4>For this systematic review, keyword-structured literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19 Primer. Papers were independently screened by two researchers, with arbitration of disagreements by a third researcher. Data were independently extracted into a pre-designed Excel template and studies critically appraised using a modified version of the MetaQAT tool, with resolution of disagreements by consensus. Findings were narratively synthesised.<h4>Results</h4>61 articles were included. 55 (90%) studies used observational designs, 50 (82%) involved hospitalised patients with higher acuity illness, and the majority had important limitations. Symptomatic adult COVID-19 cases consistently show peripheral T cell lymphopenia, which positively correlates with increased disease severity, duration of RNA positivity, and non-survival; while asymptomatic and paediatric cases display preserved counts. People with severe or critical disease generally develop more robust, virus-specific T cell responses. T cell memory and effector function has been demonstrated against multiple viral epitopes, and, cross-reactive T cell responses have been demonstrated in unexposed and uninfected adults, but the significance for protection and susceptibility, respectively, remains unclear.<h4>Conclusion</h4>A complex pattern of T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been demonstrated, but inferences regarding population level immunity are hampered by significant methodological limitations and heterogeneity between studies, as well as a striking lack of research in asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic individuals. In contrast to antibody responses, population-level surveillance of the T cell response is unlikely to be feasible in the near term. Focused evaluation in specific sub-groups, including vaccine recipients, should be prioritised.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532
work_keys_str_mv AT madhumitashrotri tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT maycivanschalkwyk tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT nathanpost tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT danielleeddy tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT catherinehuntley tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT davidleeman tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT samuelrigby tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT sarahvwilliams tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT williamhbermingham tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT paulkellam tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT johnmaher tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT adrianmshields tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT gayatriamirthalingam tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT sharonjpeacock tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT sharifaismail tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
_version_ 1714800976795271168