What is the difference between thus and thusly?

Usage guides and dictionaries largely agree that thusly was coined for humorous purposes in the mid-nineteenth century in the US as a hypercorrect substitute for thus (Butterfield 2007:157). Most of the prescriptive usage guides treat thusly critically and describe it as “best-avoided” and replaced...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morana LUKAČ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA) 2018-06-01
Series:E-REA
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/erea/6152
id doaj-90474aa1225e42d792a6cf8f8c2b33fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90474aa1225e42d792a6cf8f8c2b33fc2020-11-25T02:12:55ZengLaboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA)E-REA1638-17182018-06-011510.4000/erea.6152What is the difference between thus and thusly?Morana LUKAČUsage guides and dictionaries largely agree that thusly was coined for humorous purposes in the mid-nineteenth century in the US as a hypercorrect substitute for thus (Butterfield 2007:157). Most of the prescriptive usage guides treat thusly critically and describe it as “best-avoided” and replaced by thus or they even designate it as a “non-word” (Lukač and Tieken-Boon van Ostade forthcoming).To find out what the acceptability ratings for the word are currently, together with Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I conducted an online survey made available between July and September 2015, in which we asked the participants to rate the word on a six-fold acceptability scale (informal speech, formal speech, informal writing, formal writing, netspeak, and unacceptable under any circumstances).In this paper, with the survey findings as my starting point, I aim to establish whether a current change in progress correlates with higher acceptability ratings among younger speakers. I will do so by exploring large-scale corpora consisting of web-based data, the Global Web-Based Corpus (GloWbE) (Davies 2013) and the NOW Corpus (Davies 2013), where a higher number of occurrences of this low-frequency word can be found. I suspect that, in spite of prescriptions against the word’s usage, thusly is slowly gaining status and legitimacy. Moreover, as thusly is assigned American origin, and it is most commonly found in American usage guides (Lukač and Tieken-Boon van Ostade forthcoming), I will explore the frequency of its usage across different varieties of English as well as its meanings in context. All in all, in this paper I aim to shed light on the interplay between the treatment of thusly in prescriptive literature, the changes in speakers’ attitudes, and the variation in its usage.http://journals.openedition.org/erea/6152thuslyhypercorrectionattitudes towards usagestandardisationnon-wordusage guides
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morana LUKAČ
spellingShingle Morana LUKAČ
What is the difference between thus and thusly?
E-REA
thusly
hypercorrection
attitudes towards usage
standardisation
non-word
usage guides
author_facet Morana LUKAČ
author_sort Morana LUKAČ
title What is the difference between thus and thusly?
title_short What is the difference between thus and thusly?
title_full What is the difference between thus and thusly?
title_fullStr What is the difference between thus and thusly?
title_full_unstemmed What is the difference between thus and thusly?
title_sort what is the difference between thus and thusly?
publisher Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA)
series E-REA
issn 1638-1718
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Usage guides and dictionaries largely agree that thusly was coined for humorous purposes in the mid-nineteenth century in the US as a hypercorrect substitute for thus (Butterfield 2007:157). Most of the prescriptive usage guides treat thusly critically and describe it as “best-avoided” and replaced by thus or they even designate it as a “non-word” (Lukač and Tieken-Boon van Ostade forthcoming).To find out what the acceptability ratings for the word are currently, together with Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I conducted an online survey made available between July and September 2015, in which we asked the participants to rate the word on a six-fold acceptability scale (informal speech, formal speech, informal writing, formal writing, netspeak, and unacceptable under any circumstances).In this paper, with the survey findings as my starting point, I aim to establish whether a current change in progress correlates with higher acceptability ratings among younger speakers. I will do so by exploring large-scale corpora consisting of web-based data, the Global Web-Based Corpus (GloWbE) (Davies 2013) and the NOW Corpus (Davies 2013), where a higher number of occurrences of this low-frequency word can be found. I suspect that, in spite of prescriptions against the word’s usage, thusly is slowly gaining status and legitimacy. Moreover, as thusly is assigned American origin, and it is most commonly found in American usage guides (Lukač and Tieken-Boon van Ostade forthcoming), I will explore the frequency of its usage across different varieties of English as well as its meanings in context. All in all, in this paper I aim to shed light on the interplay between the treatment of thusly in prescriptive literature, the changes in speakers’ attitudes, and the variation in its usage.
topic thusly
hypercorrection
attitudes towards usage
standardisation
non-word
usage guides
url http://journals.openedition.org/erea/6152
work_keys_str_mv AT moranalukac whatisthedifferencebetweenthusandthusly
_version_ 1724907518033920000