Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics

A sample of 389 experienced preachers completed a measure of psychological type. They then read Mark 1:29–39 and recorded their evaluations of the four refl ections on this passage proposed by Francis (1997) and which were derived from the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preachin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leslie J. Francis, Amanda Robbins, Andrew Village
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2009-08-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/161
id doaj-902e97c94f754f98a0b938e55d1e3161
record_format Article
spelling doaj-902e97c94f754f98a0b938e55d1e31612020-11-25T00:20:30ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502009-08-01651e1e710.4102/hts.v65i1.161204Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneuticsLeslie J. Francis0Amanda Robbins1Andrew Village2University of WarwickUniversity of WarwickYork St John UniversityA sample of 389 experienced preachers completed a measure of psychological type. They then read Mark 1:29–39 and recorded their evaluations of the four refl ections on this passage proposed by Francis (1997) and which were derived from the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching. Three main conclusions are drawn from these data. First, compared with the United Kingdom population norms, preachers within this sample were signifi cantly more likely to prefer introversion, intuition, feeling and judging. Second, preachers were four times more likely to prefer a sensing interpretation of the text rather than a thinking interpretation, emphasising the richness of the narrative rather than facing the theological questions posed by it. Third, there was little evidence to suggest that preachers were less likely to appreciate interpretations consonant with their less preferred or inferior function than those consonant with their most preferred or dominant function. In this sense, the richness of the SIFT method should be accessible to preachers of all psychological types.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/161psychological typeSIFT methodbiblical hermenuticsGospel of Markpreachers
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leslie J. Francis
Amanda Robbins
Andrew Village
spellingShingle Leslie J. Francis
Amanda Robbins
Andrew Village
Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
psychological type
SIFT method
biblical hermenutics
Gospel of Mark
preachers
author_facet Leslie J. Francis
Amanda Robbins
Andrew Village
author_sort Leslie J. Francis
title Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics
title_short Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics
title_full Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics
title_fullStr Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics
title_full_unstemmed Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics
title_sort psychological type and the pulpit: an empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the sift method of biblical hermeneutics
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2009-08-01
description A sample of 389 experienced preachers completed a measure of psychological type. They then read Mark 1:29–39 and recorded their evaluations of the four refl ections on this passage proposed by Francis (1997) and which were derived from the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching. Three main conclusions are drawn from these data. First, compared with the United Kingdom population norms, preachers within this sample were signifi cantly more likely to prefer introversion, intuition, feeling and judging. Second, preachers were four times more likely to prefer a sensing interpretation of the text rather than a thinking interpretation, emphasising the richness of the narrative rather than facing the theological questions posed by it. Third, there was little evidence to suggest that preachers were less likely to appreciate interpretations consonant with their less preferred or inferior function than those consonant with their most preferred or dominant function. In this sense, the richness of the SIFT method should be accessible to preachers of all psychological types.
topic psychological type
SIFT method
biblical hermenutics
Gospel of Mark
preachers
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/161
work_keys_str_mv AT lesliejfrancis psychologicaltypeandthepulpitanempiricalenquiryconcerningpreachersandthesiftmethodofbiblicalhermeneutics
AT amandarobbins psychologicaltypeandthepulpitanempiricalenquiryconcerningpreachersandthesiftmethodofbiblicalhermeneutics
AT andrewvillage psychologicaltypeandthepulpitanempiricalenquiryconcerningpreachersandthesiftmethodofbiblicalhermeneutics
_version_ 1725367199180259328