The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project

This paper examines counterfactual display in the valuation of carbon offsetting projects. Considered a legitimate way to encourage climate change mitigation, such projects rely on the establishment of procedures for the prospective assessment of their capacity to become carbon sinks. This requires...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Véra Ehrenstein, Fabian Muniesa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2013-11-01
Series:Valuation Studies
Online Access:https://valuationstudies.liu.se/article/view/762
id doaj-9016b127eba647c8a9ee0b3d44117946
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9016b127eba647c8a9ee0b3d441179462020-11-24T21:17:56ZengLinköping University Electronic PressValuation Studies2001-59922013-11-011210.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312161The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation ProjectVéra Ehrenstein0Fabian Muniesa1 Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France This paper examines counterfactual display in the valuation of carbon offsetting projects. Considered a legitimate way to encourage climate change mitigation, such projects rely on the establishment of procedures for the prospective assessment of their capacity to become carbon sinks. This requires imagining possible worlds and assessing their plausibility. The world inhabited by the project is articulated through conditional formulation and subjected to what we call “counterfactual display”: the production and circulation of documents that demonstrate and con!gure the counterfactual valuation. We present a case study on one carbon offsetting reforestation project in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We analyse the construction of the scene that allows the “What would have happened” question to make sense and become actionable. We highlight the operations of calculative framing that this requires, the reality constraints it relies upon, and the entrepreneurial conduct it stimulates. https://valuationstudies.liu.se/article/view/762
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Véra Ehrenstein
Fabian Muniesa
spellingShingle Véra Ehrenstein
Fabian Muniesa
The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project
Valuation Studies
author_facet Véra Ehrenstein
Fabian Muniesa
author_sort Véra Ehrenstein
title The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project
title_short The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project
title_full The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project
title_fullStr The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project
title_full_unstemmed The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project
title_sort conditional sink: counterfactual display in the valuation of a carbon offsetting reforestation project
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
series Valuation Studies
issn 2001-5992
publishDate 2013-11-01
description This paper examines counterfactual display in the valuation of carbon offsetting projects. Considered a legitimate way to encourage climate change mitigation, such projects rely on the establishment of procedures for the prospective assessment of their capacity to become carbon sinks. This requires imagining possible worlds and assessing their plausibility. The world inhabited by the project is articulated through conditional formulation and subjected to what we call “counterfactual display”: the production and circulation of documents that demonstrate and con!gure the counterfactual valuation. We present a case study on one carbon offsetting reforestation project in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We analyse the construction of the scene that allows the “What would have happened” question to make sense and become actionable. We highlight the operations of calculative framing that this requires, the reality constraints it relies upon, and the entrepreneurial conduct it stimulates.
url https://valuationstudies.liu.se/article/view/762
work_keys_str_mv AT veraehrenstein theconditionalsinkcounterfactualdisplayinthevaluationofacarbonoffsettingreforestationproject
AT fabianmuniesa theconditionalsinkcounterfactualdisplayinthevaluationofacarbonoffsettingreforestationproject
AT veraehrenstein conditionalsinkcounterfactualdisplayinthevaluationofacarbonoffsettingreforestationproject
AT fabianmuniesa conditionalsinkcounterfactualdisplayinthevaluationofacarbonoffsettingreforestationproject
_version_ 1726011333041717248