Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential risks encountered during X-ray training in radiology education. 10 exposure scenarios were selected by interviewing the radiation experts who they are professors having roles in the X-ray training. Fourteen organ doses and 13 tissues (weighte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jongkyung Ko, Yongmin Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-10-01
Series:Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850718301031
id doaj-90082c578b58403bb526c23d3404840b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90082c578b58403bb526c23d3404840b2020-11-25T02:28:59ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences1687-85072018-10-01114383392Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in KoreaJongkyung Ko0Yongmin Kim1Dept. of Radiological Science, Catholic University of Daegu, 330, Hayang-eup, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 701-702, Republic of KoreaCorresponding author. .; Dept. of Radiological Science, Catholic University of Daegu, 330, Hayang-eup, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 701-702, Republic of KoreaThe objective of this study was to evaluate the potential risks encountered during X-ray training in radiology education. 10 exposure scenarios were selected by interviewing the radiation experts who they are professors having roles in the X-ray training. Fourteen organ doses and 13 tissues (weighted per ICRP 103 Publication) were measured with glass dosimeters (GD-352M) and a Rando phantom. Of 270 total organ doses (27 tissues with 10 projection methods) measured, 162 organ doses (60%) were <0.3 mSv; 206 organ doses (76.3%) were <1 mSv. The cumulative effective doses of 10 projection methods resulted in 5.71 mSv, after consideration of tissue weighting factors. Except in human radiography for education purposes, radiation exposure risk is low. The procedure is dangerous to the human body undergoing radiography, so the risk is not justified. Keywords: Radiation protection, Effective dose, Glass dosimeter, Radiologic technology students, Phantomhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850718301031
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jongkyung Ko
Yongmin Kim
spellingShingle Jongkyung Ko
Yongmin Kim
Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
author_facet Jongkyung Ko
Yongmin Kim
author_sort Jongkyung Ko
title Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea
title_short Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea
title_full Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea
title_fullStr Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea
title_sort evaluation of effective dose during x-ray training in a radiological technology program in korea
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
issn 1687-8507
publishDate 2018-10-01
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential risks encountered during X-ray training in radiology education. 10 exposure scenarios were selected by interviewing the radiation experts who they are professors having roles in the X-ray training. Fourteen organ doses and 13 tissues (weighted per ICRP 103 Publication) were measured with glass dosimeters (GD-352M) and a Rando phantom. Of 270 total organ doses (27 tissues with 10 projection methods) measured, 162 organ doses (60%) were <0.3 mSv; 206 organ doses (76.3%) were <1 mSv. The cumulative effective doses of 10 projection methods resulted in 5.71 mSv, after consideration of tissue weighting factors. Except in human radiography for education purposes, radiation exposure risk is low. The procedure is dangerous to the human body undergoing radiography, so the risk is not justified. Keywords: Radiation protection, Effective dose, Glass dosimeter, Radiologic technology students, Phantom
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850718301031
work_keys_str_mv AT jongkyungko evaluationofeffectivedoseduringxraytraininginaradiologicaltechnologyprograminkorea
AT yongminkim evaluationofeffectivedoseduringxraytraininginaradiologicaltechnologyprograminkorea
_version_ 1724835105531232256