Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment

The aim of the study was to investigate if a non-contingent distraction procedure, during the treatment, would facilitate behavior management increasing the children’s cooperation. In this study, two four-year old children, presenting non-compliance to the treatment were evaluated. The distraction t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leatrice Palieraqui Pereira da Silva, Antonio Bento Alves de Moraes, Gustavo Sattolo Rolim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Paraná 2008-12-01
Series:Interação em Psicologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.ufpr.br/psicologia/article/view/8910
id doaj-8fe7853ea16241acaa80555255918dcd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8fe7853ea16241acaa80555255918dcd2020-11-24T23:54:12ZengUniversidade Federal do ParanáInteração em Psicologia1981-80762008-12-0112210.5380/psi.v12i2.89109405Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatmentLeatrice Palieraqui Pereira da Silva0Antonio Bento Alves de Moraes1Gustavo Sattolo Rolim2UnicampUnicampUniversidade Estadual de CampinasThe aim of the study was to investigate if a non-contingent distraction procedure, during the treatment, would facilitate behavior management increasing the children’s cooperation. In this study, two four-year old children, presenting non-compliance to the treatment were evaluated. The distraction technique carried out in dental chair, during the session, involved questions and answers based in pictures. Correct answers were socially reinforced through chips and prizes. Thirteen sessions were recorded and the behaviors analyzed in each 15 seconds intervals. Indicative uncooperative behaviors expressed by high crying frequency (PI:1s-74% and 7s-35%, PII:1s-94% and 6s-40%) suggests that this non-contingent distraction was not effective in reducing children’s uncooperative behaviors. However, children’s distraction task was improved during the treatment (PI:2s-29% and 7s-100% of correct answers, PII:2s-25% and 6s-100% of correct answers. Among the subjects of this study, distraction did not modify non-cooperative behavior, but allowed children to participate of the distraction planned task, which was not incompatible with non-cooperation responses. The child learned other behaviors at the same time as being exposed to aversive conditions.   Keywords: behavior management; distraction; pediatric dentistry.http://revistas.ufpr.br/psicologia/article/view/8910manejo do comportamentodistração não contingentepsicologia aplicada à saúde
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leatrice Palieraqui Pereira da Silva
Antonio Bento Alves de Moraes
Gustavo Sattolo Rolim
spellingShingle Leatrice Palieraqui Pereira da Silva
Antonio Bento Alves de Moraes
Gustavo Sattolo Rolim
Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment
Interação em Psicologia
manejo do comportamento
distração não contingente
psicologia aplicada à saúde
author_facet Leatrice Palieraqui Pereira da Silva
Antonio Bento Alves de Moraes
Gustavo Sattolo Rolim
author_sort Leatrice Palieraqui Pereira da Silva
title Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment
title_short Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment
title_full Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment
title_fullStr Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment
title_full_unstemmed Non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment
title_sort non contingent distraction procedure effects in pediatric dentistry treatment
publisher Universidade Federal do Paraná
series Interação em Psicologia
issn 1981-8076
publishDate 2008-12-01
description The aim of the study was to investigate if a non-contingent distraction procedure, during the treatment, would facilitate behavior management increasing the children’s cooperation. In this study, two four-year old children, presenting non-compliance to the treatment were evaluated. The distraction technique carried out in dental chair, during the session, involved questions and answers based in pictures. Correct answers were socially reinforced through chips and prizes. Thirteen sessions were recorded and the behaviors analyzed in each 15 seconds intervals. Indicative uncooperative behaviors expressed by high crying frequency (PI:1s-74% and 7s-35%, PII:1s-94% and 6s-40%) suggests that this non-contingent distraction was not effective in reducing children’s uncooperative behaviors. However, children’s distraction task was improved during the treatment (PI:2s-29% and 7s-100% of correct answers, PII:2s-25% and 6s-100% of correct answers. Among the subjects of this study, distraction did not modify non-cooperative behavior, but allowed children to participate of the distraction planned task, which was not incompatible with non-cooperation responses. The child learned other behaviors at the same time as being exposed to aversive conditions.   Keywords: behavior management; distraction; pediatric dentistry.
topic manejo do comportamento
distração não contingente
psicologia aplicada à saúde
url http://revistas.ufpr.br/psicologia/article/view/8910
work_keys_str_mv AT leatricepalieraquipereiradasilva noncontingentdistractionprocedureeffectsinpediatricdentistrytreatment
AT antoniobentoalvesdemoraes noncontingentdistractionprocedureeffectsinpediatricdentistrytreatment
AT gustavosattolorolim noncontingentdistractionprocedureeffectsinpediatricdentistrytreatment
_version_ 1725466794042327040