Assessment of septoplasty effectiveness using acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry

Introduction: Septal deviation is the chief cause of chronic nasal obstruction. In order to treat such cases, nasal septoplasty surgery is usually performed based on patient complaints and a surgeon's examination, both of which are subjective. This study aims at using the objective parameters o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Hossein Dadgarnia, Mohammad Hossein Baradaranfar, Mona Mazidi, Mohammad Reza Azimi meibodi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2013-03-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijorl.mums.ac.ir/?_action=showPDF&article=305&_ob=89bc86755d05e273b17e662a93fb5027&fileName=full_text.pdf
Description
Summary:Introduction: Septal deviation is the chief cause of chronic nasal obstruction. In order to treat such cases, nasal septoplasty surgery is usually performed based on patient complaints and a surgeon's examination, both of which are subjective. This study aims at using the objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry to evaluate the effectiveness of septoplasty surgery.   Materials and Methods: A prospective study was performed in 30 candidate patients for septoplasty surgery. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry tests were performed on all patients both before and 3 months after the operation. The symptom recovery rate was recorded according to the patient's statements and anterior rhinoscopic examinations 3 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using a t-test and chi-square tests in a SPSS package.   Results: A total of 26 of 30 patients returned for a post–procedure follow-up examination after 3 months. Patients were aged from 18 to 32 years (average, 25 years). In total 69.2% (18 patients) were satisfied with the results of the procedure. In addition, rhinomanometry resulted in a decrease in general nasal resistance if patients used decongestants (P=0.03). However, the decrease was not significant before the use of decongestants (P=0.12). Furthermore, according to the results from acoustic rhinomanometry, there was an increase in the nasal cross-sectional area on both the narrow and wide sides after the operation (P
ISSN:2251-7251
2251-726X