Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning

Background and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henna Kavaluus, Katri Nousiainen, Sampsa Kaijaluoto, Tiina Seppälä, Kauko Saarilahti, Mikko Tenhunen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000038
id doaj-8fdf09a494bb418183acb32d8fdf0ab6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8fdf09a494bb418183acb32d8fdf0ab62021-03-19T07:27:15ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162021-01-01175864Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planningHenna Kavaluus0Katri Nousiainen1Sampsa Kaijaluoto2Tiina Seppälä3Kauko Saarilahti4Mikko Tenhunen5Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK, Laippatie 4, FI-00880 Helsinki, Finland; HUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, FinlandRadiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK, Laippatie 4, FI-00880 Helsinki, Finland; HUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland; HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, B.O. Box 340, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland; Corresponding author at: HUS Medical Imaging Center, P.O. Box 340, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland.Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK, Laippatie 4, FI-00880 Helsinki, FinlandHUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, FinlandHUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, FinlandHUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, FinlandBackground and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. Materials and Methods: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. Results: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. Conclusions: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000038Radiotherapy planningMagnetic resonance imagingQuality assuranceRegulatory inspections
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henna Kavaluus
Katri Nousiainen
Sampsa Kaijaluoto
Tiina Seppälä
Kauko Saarilahti
Mikko Tenhunen
spellingShingle Henna Kavaluus
Katri Nousiainen
Sampsa Kaijaluoto
Tiina Seppälä
Kauko Saarilahti
Mikko Tenhunen
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Radiotherapy planning
Magnetic resonance imaging
Quality assurance
Regulatory inspections
author_facet Henna Kavaluus
Katri Nousiainen
Sampsa Kaijaluoto
Tiina Seppälä
Kauko Saarilahti
Mikko Tenhunen
author_sort Henna Kavaluus
title Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_short Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_full Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_fullStr Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_full_unstemmed Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_sort determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
publisher Elsevier
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
issn 2405-6316
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. Materials and Methods: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. Results: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. Conclusions: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results.
topic Radiotherapy planning
Magnetic resonance imaging
Quality assurance
Regulatory inspections
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000038
work_keys_str_mv AT hennakavaluus determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT katrinousiainen determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT sampsakaijaluoto determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT tiinaseppala determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT kaukosaarilahti determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT mikkotenhunen determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
_version_ 1724213329652613120