Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
Background and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000038 |
id |
doaj-8fdf09a494bb418183acb32d8fdf0ab6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8fdf09a494bb418183acb32d8fdf0ab62021-03-19T07:27:15ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162021-01-01175864Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planningHenna Kavaluus0Katri Nousiainen1Sampsa Kaijaluoto2Tiina Seppälä3Kauko Saarilahti4Mikko Tenhunen5Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK, Laippatie 4, FI-00880 Helsinki, Finland; HUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, FinlandRadiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK, Laippatie 4, FI-00880 Helsinki, Finland; HUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland; HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, B.O. Box 340, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland; Corresponding author at: HUS Medical Imaging Center, P.O. Box 340, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland.Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK, Laippatie 4, FI-00880 Helsinki, FinlandHUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, FinlandHUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, FinlandHUS Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 180, FI-00029 Helsinki, FinlandBackground and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. Materials and Methods: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. Results: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. Conclusions: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000038Radiotherapy planningMagnetic resonance imagingQuality assuranceRegulatory inspections |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Henna Kavaluus Katri Nousiainen Sampsa Kaijaluoto Tiina Seppälä Kauko Saarilahti Mikko Tenhunen |
spellingShingle |
Henna Kavaluus Katri Nousiainen Sampsa Kaijaluoto Tiina Seppälä Kauko Saarilahti Mikko Tenhunen Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Radiotherapy planning Magnetic resonance imaging Quality assurance Regulatory inspections |
author_facet |
Henna Kavaluus Katri Nousiainen Sampsa Kaijaluoto Tiina Seppälä Kauko Saarilahti Mikko Tenhunen |
author_sort |
Henna Kavaluus |
title |
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_short |
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_full |
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_fullStr |
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_sort |
determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology |
issn |
2405-6316 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Background and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. Materials and Methods: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. Results: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. Conclusions: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results. |
topic |
Radiotherapy planning Magnetic resonance imaging Quality assurance Regulatory inspections |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000038 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hennakavaluus determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT katrinousiainen determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT sampsakaijaluoto determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT tiinaseppala determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT kaukosaarilahti determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT mikkotenhunen determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning |
_version_ |
1724213329652613120 |