Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages

For nuclear waste packages the expected dose rates and nuclide inventory are beforehand calculated. Depending on the package of the nuclear waste deterministic programs like MicroShield® provide a range of results for each type of packaging. Stochastic programs like “Monte-Carlo N-Particle Transport...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adams Mike, Smalian Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715305023
id doaj-8fdd3f7b1f764a5195cb986a6cfcb182
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8fdd3f7b1f764a5195cb986a6cfcb1822021-08-02T13:57:46ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2017-01-011530502310.1051/epjconf/201715305023epjconf_icrs2017_05023Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste PackagesAdams MikeSmalian SilvaFor nuclear waste packages the expected dose rates and nuclide inventory are beforehand calculated. Depending on the package of the nuclear waste deterministic programs like MicroShield® provide a range of results for each type of packaging. Stochastic programs like “Monte-Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System” (MCNP®) on the other hand provide reliable results for complex geometries. However this type of program requires a fully trained operator and calculations are time consuming. The problem here is to choose an appropriate program for a specific geometry. Therefore we compared the results of deterministic programs like MicroShield® and stochastic programs like MCNP®. These comparisons enable us to make a statement about the applicability of the various programs for chosen types of containers. As a conclusion we found that for thin-walled geometries deterministic programs like MicroShield® are well suited to calculate the dose rate. For cylindrical containers with inner shielding however, deterministic programs hit their limits. Furthermore we investigate the effect of an inhomogeneous material and activity distribution on the results. The calculations are still ongoing. Results will be presented in the final abstract.https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715305023
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adams Mike
Smalian Silva
spellingShingle Adams Mike
Smalian Silva
Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Adams Mike
Smalian Silva
author_sort Adams Mike
title Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages
title_short Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages
title_full Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages
title_fullStr Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages
title_full_unstemmed Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages
title_sort shielding calculations on waste packages – the limits and possibilities of different calculation methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous waste packages
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description For nuclear waste packages the expected dose rates and nuclide inventory are beforehand calculated. Depending on the package of the nuclear waste deterministic programs like MicroShield® provide a range of results for each type of packaging. Stochastic programs like “Monte-Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System” (MCNP®) on the other hand provide reliable results for complex geometries. However this type of program requires a fully trained operator and calculations are time consuming. The problem here is to choose an appropriate program for a specific geometry. Therefore we compared the results of deterministic programs like MicroShield® and stochastic programs like MCNP®. These comparisons enable us to make a statement about the applicability of the various programs for chosen types of containers. As a conclusion we found that for thin-walled geometries deterministic programs like MicroShield® are well suited to calculate the dose rate. For cylindrical containers with inner shielding however, deterministic programs hit their limits. Furthermore we investigate the effect of an inhomogeneous material and activity distribution on the results. The calculations are still ongoing. Results will be presented in the final abstract.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715305023
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsmike shieldingcalculationsonwastepackagesthelimitsandpossibilitiesofdifferentcalculationmethodsbytheexampleofhomogeneousandinhomogeneouswastepackages
AT smaliansilva shieldingcalculationsonwastepackagesthelimitsandpossibilitiesofdifferentcalculationmethodsbytheexampleofhomogeneousandinhomogeneouswastepackages
_version_ 1721231657866887168