Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages
For nuclear waste packages the expected dose rates and nuclide inventory are beforehand calculated. Depending on the package of the nuclear waste deterministic programs like MicroShield® provide a range of results for each type of packaging. Stochastic programs like “Monte-Carlo N-Particle Transport...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2017-01-01
|
Series: | EPJ Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715305023 |
id |
doaj-8fdd3f7b1f764a5195cb986a6cfcb182 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8fdd3f7b1f764a5195cb986a6cfcb1822021-08-02T13:57:46ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2017-01-011530502310.1051/epjconf/201715305023epjconf_icrs2017_05023Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste PackagesAdams MikeSmalian SilvaFor nuclear waste packages the expected dose rates and nuclide inventory are beforehand calculated. Depending on the package of the nuclear waste deterministic programs like MicroShield® provide a range of results for each type of packaging. Stochastic programs like “Monte-Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System” (MCNP®) on the other hand provide reliable results for complex geometries. However this type of program requires a fully trained operator and calculations are time consuming. The problem here is to choose an appropriate program for a specific geometry. Therefore we compared the results of deterministic programs like MicroShield® and stochastic programs like MCNP®. These comparisons enable us to make a statement about the applicability of the various programs for chosen types of containers. As a conclusion we found that for thin-walled geometries deterministic programs like MicroShield® are well suited to calculate the dose rate. For cylindrical containers with inner shielding however, deterministic programs hit their limits. Furthermore we investigate the effect of an inhomogeneous material and activity distribution on the results. The calculations are still ongoing. Results will be presented in the final abstract.https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715305023 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adams Mike Smalian Silva |
spellingShingle |
Adams Mike Smalian Silva Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages EPJ Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Adams Mike Smalian Silva |
author_sort |
Adams Mike |
title |
Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages |
title_short |
Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages |
title_full |
Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages |
title_fullStr |
Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages |
title_full_unstemmed |
Shielding Calculations on Waste Packages – The Limits and Possibilities of different Calculation Methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Waste Packages |
title_sort |
shielding calculations on waste packages – the limits and possibilities of different calculation methods by the example of homogeneous and inhomogeneous waste packages |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
EPJ Web of Conferences |
issn |
2100-014X |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
For nuclear waste packages the expected dose rates and nuclide inventory are beforehand calculated. Depending on the package of the nuclear waste deterministic programs like MicroShield® provide a range of results for each type of packaging. Stochastic programs like “Monte-Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System” (MCNP®) on the other hand provide reliable results for complex geometries. However this type of program requires a fully trained operator and calculations are time consuming. The problem here is to choose an appropriate program for a specific geometry. Therefore we compared the results of deterministic programs like MicroShield® and stochastic programs like MCNP®. These comparisons enable us to make a statement about the applicability of the various programs for chosen types of containers. As a conclusion we found that for thin-walled geometries deterministic programs like MicroShield® are well suited to calculate the dose rate. For cylindrical containers with inner shielding however, deterministic programs hit their limits. Furthermore we investigate the effect of an inhomogeneous material and activity distribution on the results. The calculations are still ongoing. Results will be presented in the final abstract. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715305023 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adamsmike shieldingcalculationsonwastepackagesthelimitsandpossibilitiesofdifferentcalculationmethodsbytheexampleofhomogeneousandinhomogeneouswastepackages AT smaliansilva shieldingcalculationsonwastepackagesthelimitsandpossibilitiesofdifferentcalculationmethodsbytheexampleofhomogeneousandinhomogeneouswastepackages |
_version_ |
1721231657866887168 |