Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
Motivation: Many clinical and scientific conclusions that rely on voxel-wise analyses of neuroimaging depend on the accurate comparison of corresponding anatomical regions. Such comparisons are made possible by registration of the images of subjects of interest onto a common brain template, such as...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-02-01
|
Series: | NeuroImage |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920311423 |
id |
doaj-8f8d8500f2004080ac74d8d2106ef86f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8f8d8500f2004080ac74d8d2106ef86f2021-02-11T04:19:23ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-02-01227117657Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain templateNelson Gil0Michael L. Lipton1Roman Fleysher2Department of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USADepartment of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USADepartment of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Corresponding author.Motivation: Many clinical and scientific conclusions that rely on voxel-wise analyses of neuroimaging depend on the accurate comparison of corresponding anatomical regions. Such comparisons are made possible by registration of the images of subjects of interest onto a common brain template, such as the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) template. However, current image registration algorithms are prone to errors that are distributed in a template-dependent manner. Therefore, the results of voxel-wise analyses can be sensitive to template choice. Despite this problem, the issue of appropriate template choice for voxel-wise analyses is not generally addressed in contemporary neuroimaging studies, which may lead to the reporting of spurious results. Results: We present a novel approach to determine the suitability of a brain template for voxel-wise analysis. The approach is based on computing a “distance” between automatically-generated atlases of the subjects of interest and templates that is indicative of the extent of subject-to-template registration errors. This allows for the filtering of subjects and candidate templates based on a quantitative measure of registration quality. We benchmark our approach by evaluating alternative templates for a voxel-wise analysis that reproduces the well-known decline in fractional anisotropy (FA) with age. Our results show that filtering registrations minimizes errors and decreases the sensitivity of voxel-wise analysis to template choice. In addition to carrying important implications for future neuroimaging studies, the developed framework of template induction can be used to evaluate robustness of data analysis methods to template choice.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920311423Image registrationVoxel-wise analysisBrain templateSubject-specific analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nelson Gil Michael L. Lipton Roman Fleysher |
spellingShingle |
Nelson Gil Michael L. Lipton Roman Fleysher Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template NeuroImage Image registration Voxel-wise analysis Brain template Subject-specific analysis |
author_facet |
Nelson Gil Michael L. Lipton Roman Fleysher |
author_sort |
Nelson Gil |
title |
Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template |
title_short |
Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template |
title_full |
Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template |
title_fullStr |
Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template |
title_full_unstemmed |
Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template |
title_sort |
registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
NeuroImage |
issn |
1095-9572 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Motivation: Many clinical and scientific conclusions that rely on voxel-wise analyses of neuroimaging depend on the accurate comparison of corresponding anatomical regions. Such comparisons are made possible by registration of the images of subjects of interest onto a common brain template, such as the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) template. However, current image registration algorithms are prone to errors that are distributed in a template-dependent manner. Therefore, the results of voxel-wise analyses can be sensitive to template choice. Despite this problem, the issue of appropriate template choice for voxel-wise analyses is not generally addressed in contemporary neuroimaging studies, which may lead to the reporting of spurious results. Results: We present a novel approach to determine the suitability of a brain template for voxel-wise analysis. The approach is based on computing a “distance” between automatically-generated atlases of the subjects of interest and templates that is indicative of the extent of subject-to-template registration errors. This allows for the filtering of subjects and candidate templates based on a quantitative measure of registration quality. We benchmark our approach by evaluating alternative templates for a voxel-wise analysis that reproduces the well-known decline in fractional anisotropy (FA) with age. Our results show that filtering registrations minimizes errors and decreases the sensitivity of voxel-wise analysis to template choice. In addition to carrying important implications for future neuroimaging studies, the developed framework of template induction can be used to evaluate robustness of data analysis methods to template choice. |
topic |
Image registration Voxel-wise analysis Brain template Subject-specific analysis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920311423 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nelsongil registrationqualityfilteringimprovesrobustnessofvoxelwiseanalysestothechoiceofbraintemplate AT michaelllipton registrationqualityfilteringimprovesrobustnessofvoxelwiseanalysestothechoiceofbraintemplate AT romanfleysher registrationqualityfilteringimprovesrobustnessofvoxelwiseanalysestothechoiceofbraintemplate |
_version_ |
1724274672173842432 |