Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template

Motivation: Many clinical and scientific conclusions that rely on voxel-wise analyses of neuroimaging depend on the accurate comparison of corresponding anatomical regions. Such comparisons are made possible by registration of the images of subjects of interest onto a common brain template, such as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nelson Gil, Michael L. Lipton, Roman Fleysher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-02-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920311423
id doaj-8f8d8500f2004080ac74d8d2106ef86f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f8d8500f2004080ac74d8d2106ef86f2021-02-11T04:19:23ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-02-01227117657Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain templateNelson Gil0Michael L. Lipton1Roman Fleysher2Department of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USADepartment of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USADepartment of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Corresponding author.Motivation: Many clinical and scientific conclusions that rely on voxel-wise analyses of neuroimaging depend on the accurate comparison of corresponding anatomical regions. Such comparisons are made possible by registration of the images of subjects of interest onto a common brain template, such as the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) template. However, current image registration algorithms are prone to errors that are distributed in a template-dependent manner. Therefore, the results of voxel-wise analyses can be sensitive to template choice. Despite this problem, the issue of appropriate template choice for voxel-wise analyses is not generally addressed in contemporary neuroimaging studies, which may lead to the reporting of spurious results. Results: We present a novel approach to determine the suitability of a brain template for voxel-wise analysis. The approach is based on computing a “distance” between automatically-generated atlases of the subjects of interest and templates that is indicative of the extent of subject-to-template registration errors. This allows for the filtering of subjects and candidate templates based on a quantitative measure of registration quality. We benchmark our approach by evaluating alternative templates for a voxel-wise analysis that reproduces the well-known decline in fractional anisotropy (FA) with age. Our results show that filtering registrations minimizes errors and decreases the sensitivity of voxel-wise analysis to template choice. In addition to carrying important implications for future neuroimaging studies, the developed framework of template induction can be used to evaluate robustness of data analysis methods to template choice.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920311423Image registrationVoxel-wise analysisBrain templateSubject-specific analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nelson Gil
Michael L. Lipton
Roman Fleysher
spellingShingle Nelson Gil
Michael L. Lipton
Roman Fleysher
Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
NeuroImage
Image registration
Voxel-wise analysis
Brain template
Subject-specific analysis
author_facet Nelson Gil
Michael L. Lipton
Roman Fleysher
author_sort Nelson Gil
title Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
title_short Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
title_full Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
title_fullStr Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
title_full_unstemmed Registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
title_sort registration quality filtering improves robustness of voxel-wise analyses to the choice of brain template
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage
issn 1095-9572
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Motivation: Many clinical and scientific conclusions that rely on voxel-wise analyses of neuroimaging depend on the accurate comparison of corresponding anatomical regions. Such comparisons are made possible by registration of the images of subjects of interest onto a common brain template, such as the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) template. However, current image registration algorithms are prone to errors that are distributed in a template-dependent manner. Therefore, the results of voxel-wise analyses can be sensitive to template choice. Despite this problem, the issue of appropriate template choice for voxel-wise analyses is not generally addressed in contemporary neuroimaging studies, which may lead to the reporting of spurious results. Results: We present a novel approach to determine the suitability of a brain template for voxel-wise analysis. The approach is based on computing a “distance” between automatically-generated atlases of the subjects of interest and templates that is indicative of the extent of subject-to-template registration errors. This allows for the filtering of subjects and candidate templates based on a quantitative measure of registration quality. We benchmark our approach by evaluating alternative templates for a voxel-wise analysis that reproduces the well-known decline in fractional anisotropy (FA) with age. Our results show that filtering registrations minimizes errors and decreases the sensitivity of voxel-wise analysis to template choice. In addition to carrying important implications for future neuroimaging studies, the developed framework of template induction can be used to evaluate robustness of data analysis methods to template choice.
topic Image registration
Voxel-wise analysis
Brain template
Subject-specific analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920311423
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsongil registrationqualityfilteringimprovesrobustnessofvoxelwiseanalysestothechoiceofbraintemplate
AT michaelllipton registrationqualityfilteringimprovesrobustnessofvoxelwiseanalysestothechoiceofbraintemplate
AT romanfleysher registrationqualityfilteringimprovesrobustnessofvoxelwiseanalysestothechoiceofbraintemplate
_version_ 1724274672173842432