Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks

Purpose – Ensuring quality is one of the most significant challenges in microtask crowdsourcing tasks. Aggregation of the collected data from the crowd is one of the important steps to infer the correct answer, but the existing study seems to be limited to the single-step task. This study aims to lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiong Bu, Elena Simperl, Adriane Chapman, Eddy Maddalena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2019-12-01
Series:International Journal of Crowd Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJCS-06-2019-0017/full/pdf?title=quality-assessment-in-crowdsourced-classification-tasks
id doaj-8f8564fd1971401f9beb50132c0f8ddf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f8564fd1971401f9beb50132c0f8ddf2021-07-30T16:00:24ZengEmerald PublishingInternational Journal of Crowd Science2398-72942019-12-013322224810.1108/IJCS-06-2019-0017634485Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasksQiong Bu0Elena Simperl1Adriane Chapman2Eddy Maddalena3School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKPurpose – Ensuring quality is one of the most significant challenges in microtask crowdsourcing tasks. Aggregation of the collected data from the crowd is one of the important steps to infer the correct answer, but the existing study seems to be limited to the single-step task. This study aims to look at multiple-step classification tasks and understand aggregation in such cases; hence, it is useful for assessing the classification quality. Design/methodology/approach – The authors present a model to capture the information of the workflow, questions and answers for both single- and multiple-question classification tasks. They propose an adapted approach on top of the classic approach so that the model can handle tasks with several multiple-choice questions in general instead of a specific domain or any specific hierarchical classifications. They evaluate their approach with three representative tasks from existing citizen science projects in which they have the gold standard created by experts. Findings – The results show that the approach can provide significant improvements to the overall classification accuracy. The authors’ analysis also demonstrates that all algorithms can achieve higher accuracy for the volunteer- versus paid-generated data sets for the same task. Furthermore, the authors observed interesting patterns in the relationship between the performance of different algorithms and workflow-specific factors including the number of steps and the number of available options in each step. Originality/value – Due to the nature of crowdsourcing, aggregating the collected data is an important process to understand the quality of crowdsourcing results. Different inference algorithms have been studied for simple microtasks consisting of single questions with two or more answers. However, as classification tasks typically contain many questions, the proposed method can be applied to a wide range of tasks including both single- and multiple-question classification tasks.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJCS-06-2019-0017/full/pdf?title=quality-assessment-in-crowdsourced-classification-tasksaggregationclassificationtask-orientated crowdsourcingquality assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qiong Bu
Elena Simperl
Adriane Chapman
Eddy Maddalena
spellingShingle Qiong Bu
Elena Simperl
Adriane Chapman
Eddy Maddalena
Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks
International Journal of Crowd Science
aggregation
classification
task-orientated crowdsourcing
quality assessment
author_facet Qiong Bu
Elena Simperl
Adriane Chapman
Eddy Maddalena
author_sort Qiong Bu
title Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks
title_short Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks
title_full Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks
title_fullStr Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks
title_full_unstemmed Quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks
title_sort quality assessment in crowdsourced classification tasks
publisher Emerald Publishing
series International Journal of Crowd Science
issn 2398-7294
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Purpose – Ensuring quality is one of the most significant challenges in microtask crowdsourcing tasks. Aggregation of the collected data from the crowd is one of the important steps to infer the correct answer, but the existing study seems to be limited to the single-step task. This study aims to look at multiple-step classification tasks and understand aggregation in such cases; hence, it is useful for assessing the classification quality. Design/methodology/approach – The authors present a model to capture the information of the workflow, questions and answers for both single- and multiple-question classification tasks. They propose an adapted approach on top of the classic approach so that the model can handle tasks with several multiple-choice questions in general instead of a specific domain or any specific hierarchical classifications. They evaluate their approach with three representative tasks from existing citizen science projects in which they have the gold standard created by experts. Findings – The results show that the approach can provide significant improvements to the overall classification accuracy. The authors’ analysis also demonstrates that all algorithms can achieve higher accuracy for the volunteer- versus paid-generated data sets for the same task. Furthermore, the authors observed interesting patterns in the relationship between the performance of different algorithms and workflow-specific factors including the number of steps and the number of available options in each step. Originality/value – Due to the nature of crowdsourcing, aggregating the collected data is an important process to understand the quality of crowdsourcing results. Different inference algorithms have been studied for simple microtasks consisting of single questions with two or more answers. However, as classification tasks typically contain many questions, the proposed method can be applied to a wide range of tasks including both single- and multiple-question classification tasks.
topic aggregation
classification
task-orientated crowdsourcing
quality assessment
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJCS-06-2019-0017/full/pdf?title=quality-assessment-in-crowdsourced-classification-tasks
work_keys_str_mv AT qiongbu qualityassessmentincrowdsourcedclassificationtasks
AT elenasimperl qualityassessmentincrowdsourcedclassificationtasks
AT adrianechapman qualityassessmentincrowdsourcedclassificationtasks
AT eddymaddalena qualityassessmentincrowdsourcedclassificationtasks
_version_ 1721247465636626432