Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors

Abstract Background Physicians and physicists are expected to contribute to patient safety and quality improvement (QI) in Radiation Oncology (RO), but prior studies suggest that training for this may be inadequate. RO and medical physics (MP) program directors (PDs) were surveyed to better understa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew B. Spraker, Matthew J. Nyflot, Kristi R. G. Hendrickson, Stephanie Terezakis, Shannon E. Fogh, Gabrielle M. Kane, Eric C. Ford, Jing Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-09-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1128-5
id doaj-8f6dcf0374d3493d971407ec8ff37ad6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f6dcf0374d3493d971407ec8ff37ad62020-11-24T20:50:48ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2018-09-011311810.1186/s13014-018-1128-5Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directorsMatthew B. Spraker0Matthew J. Nyflot1Kristi R. G. Hendrickson2Stephanie Terezakis3Shannon E. Fogh4Gabrielle M. Kane5Eric C. Ford6Jing Zeng7Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. LouisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WashingtonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WashingtonDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins UniversityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San FranciscoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WashingtonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WashingtonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WashingtonAbstract Background Physicians and physicists are expected to contribute to patient safety and quality improvement (QI) in Radiation Oncology (RO), but prior studies suggest that training for this may be inadequate. RO and medical physics (MP) program directors (PDs) were surveyed to better understand the current patient safety/QI training in their residency programs. Methods PDs were surveyed via email in January 2017. Survey questions inquired about current training, curriculum elements, and barriers to development and/or improvement of safety and QI training. Results Eighty-nine RO PDs and 84 MP PDs were surveyed, and 21 RO PDs (28%) and 31 MP PDs (37%) responded. Both RO and MP PDs had favorable opinions of current safety and QI training, and used a range of resources for program development, especially safety and QI publications. Various curriculum elements were reported. Curriculum elements used by RO and MP PDs were similar, except RO were more likely than MP PDs to implement morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference (72% vs. 45%, p < 0.05). RO and MP PDs similarly cited various barriers, but RO PDs were more likely to cite lack of experience than MP PDs (40% vs. 16%, p < 0.05). PDs responded similarly independent of whether they reported using a departmental incident learning system (ILS) or not. Conclusions PDs view patient safety/QI as an important part of resident education. Most PDs agreed that residents are adequately exposed to patient safety/QI and prepared to meet the patient safety/QI expectations of clinical practice. This conflicts with other independent studies that indicate a majority of residents feel their patient safety/QI training is inadequate and lacks formal exposure to QI tools.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1128-5SafetyQuality improvementEducationResidency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew B. Spraker
Matthew J. Nyflot
Kristi R. G. Hendrickson
Stephanie Terezakis
Shannon E. Fogh
Gabrielle M. Kane
Eric C. Ford
Jing Zeng
spellingShingle Matthew B. Spraker
Matthew J. Nyflot
Kristi R. G. Hendrickson
Stephanie Terezakis
Shannon E. Fogh
Gabrielle M. Kane
Eric C. Ford
Jing Zeng
Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
Radiation Oncology
Safety
Quality improvement
Education
Residency
author_facet Matthew B. Spraker
Matthew J. Nyflot
Kristi R. G. Hendrickson
Stephanie Terezakis
Shannon E. Fogh
Gabrielle M. Kane
Eric C. Ford
Jing Zeng
author_sort Matthew B. Spraker
title Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
title_short Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
title_full Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
title_fullStr Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
title_full_unstemmed Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
title_sort radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Abstract Background Physicians and physicists are expected to contribute to patient safety and quality improvement (QI) in Radiation Oncology (RO), but prior studies suggest that training for this may be inadequate. RO and medical physics (MP) program directors (PDs) were surveyed to better understand the current patient safety/QI training in their residency programs. Methods PDs were surveyed via email in January 2017. Survey questions inquired about current training, curriculum elements, and barriers to development and/or improvement of safety and QI training. Results Eighty-nine RO PDs and 84 MP PDs were surveyed, and 21 RO PDs (28%) and 31 MP PDs (37%) responded. Both RO and MP PDs had favorable opinions of current safety and QI training, and used a range of resources for program development, especially safety and QI publications. Various curriculum elements were reported. Curriculum elements used by RO and MP PDs were similar, except RO were more likely than MP PDs to implement morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference (72% vs. 45%, p < 0.05). RO and MP PDs similarly cited various barriers, but RO PDs were more likely to cite lack of experience than MP PDs (40% vs. 16%, p < 0.05). PDs responded similarly independent of whether they reported using a departmental incident learning system (ILS) or not. Conclusions PDs view patient safety/QI as an important part of resident education. Most PDs agreed that residents are adequately exposed to patient safety/QI and prepared to meet the patient safety/QI expectations of clinical practice. This conflicts with other independent studies that indicate a majority of residents feel their patient safety/QI training is inadequate and lacks formal exposure to QI tools.
topic Safety
Quality improvement
Education
Residency
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1128-5
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewbspraker radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT matthewjnyflot radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT kristirghendrickson radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT stephanieterezakis radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT shannonefogh radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT gabriellemkane radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT ericcford radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT jingzeng radiationoncologyresidenttraininginpatientsafetyandqualityimprovementanationalsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors
_version_ 1716803584803209216