Examining Older Adults’ Perceptions of Usability and Acceptability of Remote Monitoring Systems to Manage Chronic Heart Failure

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of using remote monitoring systems (RMS) in monitoring health status (e.g., vital signs, symptom distress) in older adults (≥55) with chronic heart failure (HF). Method: Twenty-one patients (52.4% women, me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorraine S. Evangelista PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN, Debra K. Moser DNSc, RN, FAAN, Jung-Ah Lee PhD, RN, Alison A. Moore MD, MPH, Hassan Ghasemzadeh PhD, Majid Sarrafzadeh PhD, Carol M. Mangione MD, MSPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-11-01
Series:Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721415618050
Description
Summary:Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of using remote monitoring systems (RMS) in monitoring health status (e.g., vital signs, symptom distress) in older adults (≥55) with chronic heart failure (HF). Method: Twenty-one patients (52.4% women, mean age 73.1 ± 9.3) were trained to measure and transmit health data with an RMS. Data transmissions were tracked for 12 weeks. Results: All participants initiated use of RMS within 1 week; 71%, 14%, and 14% of patients transmitted daily health data 100%, ≥75%, and <75% of the time, respectively, for 12 weeks. Overall usability and acceptability of the RMS were 4.08 ± 0.634 and 4.10 ± 0.563, respectively (when scored on a range of 1-5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree ). Discussion: Findings show that an RMS-based intervention can be successfully implemented in a group of older patients with chronic HF.
ISSN:2333-7214