Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
The confounding of selection and measurement effects between different modes is a disadvantage of mixed-mode surveys. Solutions to this problem have been suggested in several studies. Most use adjusting covariates to control selection effects. Unfortunately, these covariates must meet strong assumpt...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Official Statistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0001 |
id |
doaj-8f574d9780654443a06abcc7aec717b8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8f574d9780654443a06abcc7aec717b82021-09-06T19:41:46ZengSciendoJournal of Official Statistics2001-73672014-03-0130112110.2478/jos-2014-0001jos-2014-0001Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment ModelsVannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A.0Loosveldt Geert1Molenberghs Geert2Institute for Social & Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, United KingdomCentre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45, Leuven 3000, BelgiumI-BioStat, KU Leuven, Leuven, and Universiteit Hasselt, Diepenbeek, BelgiumThe confounding of selection and measurement effects between different modes is a disadvantage of mixed-mode surveys. Solutions to this problem have been suggested in several studies. Most use adjusting covariates to control selection effects. Unfortunately, these covariates must meet strong assumptions, which are generally ignored. This article discusses these assumptions in greater detail and also provides an alternative model for solving the problem. This alternative uses adjusting covariates, explaining measurement effects instead of selection effects. The application of both models is illustrated by using data from a survey on opinions about surveys, which yields mode effects in line with expectations for the latter model, and mode effects contrary to expectations for the former model. However, the validity of these results depends entirely on the (ad hoc) covariates chosen. Research into better covariates might thus be a topic for future studies.https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0001selection effectsmeasurement effectsback-door modelfront-door modelcausal inferenceopinion about surveys |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A. Loosveldt Geert Molenberghs Geert |
spellingShingle |
Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A. Loosveldt Geert Molenberghs Geert Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models Journal of Official Statistics selection effects measurement effects back-door model front-door model causal inference opinion about surveys |
author_facet |
Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A. Loosveldt Geert Molenberghs Geert |
author_sort |
Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A. |
title |
Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models |
title_short |
Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models |
title_full |
Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models |
title_sort |
evaluating mode effects in mixed-mode survey data using covariate adjustment models |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Journal of Official Statistics |
issn |
2001-7367 |
publishDate |
2014-03-01 |
description |
The confounding of selection and measurement effects between different modes is a disadvantage of mixed-mode surveys. Solutions to this problem have been suggested in several studies. Most use adjusting covariates to control selection effects. Unfortunately, these covariates must meet strong assumptions, which are generally ignored. This article discusses these assumptions in greater detail and also provides an alternative model for solving the problem. This alternative uses adjusting covariates, explaining measurement effects instead of selection effects. The application of both models is illustrated by using data from a survey on opinions about surveys, which yields mode effects in line with expectations for the latter model, and mode effects contrary to expectations for the former model. However, the validity of these results depends entirely on the (ad hoc) covariates chosen. Research into better covariates might thus be a topic for future studies. |
topic |
selection effects measurement effects back-door model front-door model causal inference opinion about surveys |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0001 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vannieuwenhuyzejorreta evaluatingmodeeffectsinmixedmodesurveydatausingcovariateadjustmentmodels AT loosveldtgeert evaluatingmodeeffectsinmixedmodesurveydatausingcovariateadjustmentmodels AT molenberghsgeert evaluatingmodeeffectsinmixedmodesurveydatausingcovariateadjustmentmodels |
_version_ |
1717765468401434624 |