Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models

The confounding of selection and measurement effects between different modes is a disadvantage of mixed-mode surveys. Solutions to this problem have been suggested in several studies. Most use adjusting covariates to control selection effects. Unfortunately, these covariates must meet strong assumpt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A., Loosveldt Geert, Molenberghs Geert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2014-03-01
Series:Journal of Official Statistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0001
id doaj-8f574d9780654443a06abcc7aec717b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f574d9780654443a06abcc7aec717b82021-09-06T19:41:46ZengSciendoJournal of Official Statistics2001-73672014-03-0130112110.2478/jos-2014-0001jos-2014-0001Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment ModelsVannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A.0Loosveldt Geert1Molenberghs Geert2Institute for Social & Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, United KingdomCentre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45, Leuven 3000, BelgiumI-BioStat, KU Leuven, Leuven, and Universiteit Hasselt, Diepenbeek, BelgiumThe confounding of selection and measurement effects between different modes is a disadvantage of mixed-mode surveys. Solutions to this problem have been suggested in several studies. Most use adjusting covariates to control selection effects. Unfortunately, these covariates must meet strong assumptions, which are generally ignored. This article discusses these assumptions in greater detail and also provides an alternative model for solving the problem. This alternative uses adjusting covariates, explaining measurement effects instead of selection effects. The application of both models is illustrated by using data from a survey on opinions about surveys, which yields mode effects in line with expectations for the latter model, and mode effects contrary to expectations for the former model. However, the validity of these results depends entirely on the (ad hoc) covariates chosen. Research into better covariates might thus be a topic for future studies.https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0001selection effectsmeasurement effectsback-door modelfront-door modelcausal inferenceopinion about surveys
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A.
Loosveldt Geert
Molenberghs Geert
spellingShingle Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A.
Loosveldt Geert
Molenberghs Geert
Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
Journal of Official Statistics
selection effects
measurement effects
back-door model
front-door model
causal inference
opinion about surveys
author_facet Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A.
Loosveldt Geert
Molenberghs Geert
author_sort Vannieuwenhuyze Jorre T.A.
title Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
title_short Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
title_full Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
title_fullStr Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
title_sort evaluating mode effects in mixed-mode survey data using covariate adjustment models
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Official Statistics
issn 2001-7367
publishDate 2014-03-01
description The confounding of selection and measurement effects between different modes is a disadvantage of mixed-mode surveys. Solutions to this problem have been suggested in several studies. Most use adjusting covariates to control selection effects. Unfortunately, these covariates must meet strong assumptions, which are generally ignored. This article discusses these assumptions in greater detail and also provides an alternative model for solving the problem. This alternative uses adjusting covariates, explaining measurement effects instead of selection effects. The application of both models is illustrated by using data from a survey on opinions about surveys, which yields mode effects in line with expectations for the latter model, and mode effects contrary to expectations for the former model. However, the validity of these results depends entirely on the (ad hoc) covariates chosen. Research into better covariates might thus be a topic for future studies.
topic selection effects
measurement effects
back-door model
front-door model
causal inference
opinion about surveys
url https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0001
work_keys_str_mv AT vannieuwenhuyzejorreta evaluatingmodeeffectsinmixedmodesurveydatausingcovariateadjustmentmodels
AT loosveldtgeert evaluatingmodeeffectsinmixedmodesurveydatausingcovariateadjustmentmodels
AT molenberghsgeert evaluatingmodeeffectsinmixedmodesurveydatausingcovariateadjustmentmodels
_version_ 1717765468401434624