Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section

We report two cases of women with a previous cesarean performed before active labor at 29 weeks of gestation who underwent sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) at 36 weeks' gestation in their subsequent pregnancy. In both cases, uterine scar defect was detected on the uppe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah-Maude B. Laflamme, Nicole Jastrow, Mario Girard, Gaétan Paris, Laurie Bérubé, Emmanuel Bujold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2011-09-01
Series:American Journal of Perinatology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0031-1284222
id doaj-8f1ede8d81b946e8ace4a1a9aada5865
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f1ede8d81b946e8ace4a1a9aada58652020-11-25T02:53:04ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.American Journal of Perinatology Reports2157-69982157-70052011-09-01010106506810.1055/s-0031-1284222Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean SectionSarah-Maude B. Laflamme0 Nicole Jastrow1Mario Girard2Gaétan Paris3Laurie Bérubé4Emmanuel Bujold5Université LavalGeneva's University HospitalsUniversité LavalUniversité LavalUniversité LavalUniversité LavalWe report two cases of women with a previous cesarean performed before active labor at 29 weeks of gestation who underwent sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) at 36 weeks' gestation in their subsequent pregnancy. In both cases, uterine scar defect was detected on the upper part of the LUS, at ~9 to 11 cm from the cervical os, and was only visualized by the transabdominal approach. We suggest that early gestational age and the absence of labor at previous cesarean can lead to a higher uterine scar location on the LUS and, therefore, increase the risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancy. The heterogeneity of uterine scar location could explain discrepancies observed in studies using the transabdominal versus the transvaginal approach or both regarding the predictive value of LUS measurements for uterine rupture.https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0031-1284222VBACuterine rupturelower uterine segmentultrasounddehiscencescaruterus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah-Maude B. Laflamme
Nicole Jastrow
Mario Girard
Gaétan Paris
Laurie Bérubé
Emmanuel Bujold
spellingShingle Sarah-Maude B. Laflamme
Nicole Jastrow
Mario Girard
Gaétan Paris
Laurie Bérubé
Emmanuel Bujold
Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
American Journal of Perinatology Reports
VBAC
uterine rupture
lower uterine segment
ultrasound
dehiscence
scar
uterus
author_facet Sarah-Maude B. Laflamme
Nicole Jastrow
Mario Girard
Gaétan Paris
Laurie Bérubé
Emmanuel Bujold
author_sort Sarah-Maude B. Laflamme
title Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
title_short Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
title_full Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
title_fullStr Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
title_full_unstemmed Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
title_sort pitfall in ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar from prior preterm cesarean section
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
series American Journal of Perinatology Reports
issn 2157-6998
2157-7005
publishDate 2011-09-01
description We report two cases of women with a previous cesarean performed before active labor at 29 weeks of gestation who underwent sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) at 36 weeks' gestation in their subsequent pregnancy. In both cases, uterine scar defect was detected on the upper part of the LUS, at ~9 to 11 cm from the cervical os, and was only visualized by the transabdominal approach. We suggest that early gestational age and the absence of labor at previous cesarean can lead to a higher uterine scar location on the LUS and, therefore, increase the risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancy. The heterogeneity of uterine scar location could explain discrepancies observed in studies using the transabdominal versus the transvaginal approach or both regarding the predictive value of LUS measurements for uterine rupture.
topic VBAC
uterine rupture
lower uterine segment
ultrasound
dehiscence
scar
uterus
url https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0031-1284222
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahmaudeblaflamme pitfallinultrasoundevaluationofuterinescarfrompriorpretermcesareansection
AT nicolejastrow pitfallinultrasoundevaluationofuterinescarfrompriorpretermcesareansection
AT mariogirard pitfallinultrasoundevaluationofuterinescarfrompriorpretermcesareansection
AT gaetanparis pitfallinultrasoundevaluationofuterinescarfrompriorpretermcesareansection
AT laurieberube pitfallinultrasoundevaluationofuterinescarfrompriorpretermcesareansection
AT emmanuelbujold pitfallinultrasoundevaluationofuterinescarfrompriorpretermcesareansection
_version_ 1724726920828944384