Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer
BackgroundResponse rates to single agent immune checkpoint blockade in unselected pretreated HER2−negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are low. However, they may be augmented when combined with chemotherapy.MethodsWe conducted a single-arm, phase II study of patients with triple negative (TN) or...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer |
Online Access: | https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e000173.full |
id |
doaj-8f13f23e68dd4f8e940351b6de1ccf17 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8f13f23e68dd4f8e940351b6de1ccf172021-07-19T12:00:23ZengBMJ Publishing GroupJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer2051-14262020-06-018110.1136/jitc-2019-000173Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancerAmi N ShahLisa FlaumIrene HelenowskiCesar A Santa-MariaSarika Jain0Alfred Rademaker1Valerie NelsonDean TsarwhasMassimo Cristofanilli2William Gradishar31Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USADepartment of Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine;Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USAassociate professor of medicineBackgroundResponse rates to single agent immune checkpoint blockade in unselected pretreated HER2−negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are low. However, they may be augmented when combined with chemotherapy.MethodsWe conducted a single-arm, phase II study of patients with triple negative (TN) or hormone receptor-positive endocrine-refractory (HR+) MBC who were candidates for capecitabine. Patients were treated with pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 by mouth twice daily on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with historic controls and secondary end points were overall response rate (ORR), safety and tolerability. The study had 80% power to detect a 2-month improvement in mPFS with the addition of pembrolizumab over historic controls treated with capecitabine alone.ResultsThirty patients, 16 TN and 14 HR+ MBC, were enrolled from 2017 to 2018. Patients had a median age of 51 years and received a median of 1 (range 0–6) prior lines of therapy for MBC. Of 29 evaluable patients, the mPFS was 4.0 (95% CI 2.0 to 6.4) months and was not significantly longer than historic controls of 3 months. The median overall survival was 15.4 (95% CI 8.2 to 20.3) months. The ORR was 14% (n=4), stable disease (SD) was 41% (n=12) and clinical benefit rate (CBR=partial response+SD>6 months) was 28% (n=8). The ORR and CBR were not significantly different between disease subtypes (ORR 13% and 14%, CBR 25% and 29% for TN and HR+, respectively). The 1-year PFS rate was 20.7% and three patients have ongoing responses. The most common adverse events were low grade and consistent with those seen in MBC patients receiving capecitabine, including hand-foot syndrome, gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue and cytopenias. Toxicities at least possibly from pembrolizumab included grade 3 or 4 liver test abnormalities (7%), rash (7%) and diarrhea (3%), as well as grade 5 hepatic failure in a patient with liver metastases.ConclusionsCompared with historical controls, pembrolizumab with capecitabine did not improve PFS in this biomarker unselected, pretreated cohort. However, some patients had prolonged disease control.Trial registration numberNCT03044730.https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e000173.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ami N Shah Lisa Flaum Irene Helenowski Cesar A Santa-Maria Sarika Jain Alfred Rademaker Valerie Nelson Dean Tsarwhas Massimo Cristofanilli William Gradishar |
spellingShingle |
Ami N Shah Lisa Flaum Irene Helenowski Cesar A Santa-Maria Sarika Jain Alfred Rademaker Valerie Nelson Dean Tsarwhas Massimo Cristofanilli William Gradishar Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer |
author_facet |
Ami N Shah Lisa Flaum Irene Helenowski Cesar A Santa-Maria Sarika Jain Alfred Rademaker Valerie Nelson Dean Tsarwhas Massimo Cristofanilli William Gradishar |
author_sort |
Ami N Shah |
title |
Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer |
title_short |
Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer |
title_full |
Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer |
title_fullStr |
Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer |
title_sort |
phase ii study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, her2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer |
issn |
2051-1426 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
BackgroundResponse rates to single agent immune checkpoint blockade in unselected pretreated HER2−negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are low. However, they may be augmented when combined with chemotherapy.MethodsWe conducted a single-arm, phase II study of patients with triple negative (TN) or hormone receptor-positive endocrine-refractory (HR+) MBC who were candidates for capecitabine. Patients were treated with pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 by mouth twice daily on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with historic controls and secondary end points were overall response rate (ORR), safety and tolerability. The study had 80% power to detect a 2-month improvement in mPFS with the addition of pembrolizumab over historic controls treated with capecitabine alone.ResultsThirty patients, 16 TN and 14 HR+ MBC, were enrolled from 2017 to 2018. Patients had a median age of 51 years and received a median of 1 (range 0–6) prior lines of therapy for MBC. Of 29 evaluable patients, the mPFS was 4.0 (95% CI 2.0 to 6.4) months and was not significantly longer than historic controls of 3 months. The median overall survival was 15.4 (95% CI 8.2 to 20.3) months. The ORR was 14% (n=4), stable disease (SD) was 41% (n=12) and clinical benefit rate (CBR=partial response+SD>6 months) was 28% (n=8). The ORR and CBR were not significantly different between disease subtypes (ORR 13% and 14%, CBR 25% and 29% for TN and HR+, respectively). The 1-year PFS rate was 20.7% and three patients have ongoing responses. The most common adverse events were low grade and consistent with those seen in MBC patients receiving capecitabine, including hand-foot syndrome, gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue and cytopenias. Toxicities at least possibly from pembrolizumab included grade 3 or 4 liver test abnormalities (7%), rash (7%) and diarrhea (3%), as well as grade 5 hepatic failure in a patient with liver metastases.ConclusionsCompared with historical controls, pembrolizumab with capecitabine did not improve PFS in this biomarker unselected, pretreated cohort. However, some patients had prolonged disease control.Trial registration numberNCT03044730. |
url |
https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e000173.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aminshah phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT lisaflaum phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT irenehelenowski phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT cesarasantamaria phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT sarikajain phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT alfredrademaker phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT valerienelson phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT deantsarwhas phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT massimocristofanilli phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer AT williamgradishar phaseiistudyofpembrolizumabandcapecitabinefortriplenegativeandhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativeendocrinerefractorymetastaticbreastcancer |
_version_ |
1721295002896695296 |