Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation

After an incipient fault mode has been detected a logical question to ask is: How long can the system continue to be operated before the incipient fault mode degrades to a failure condition? In many cases answering this question is complicated by the fact that further fault growth will depend on how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian Bole, Kai Goebel, George Vachtsevanos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Prognostics and Health Management Society 2015-12-01
Series:International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2325
id doaj-8f11c9a874154402b7ce147945e5e589
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f11c9a874154402b7ce147945e5e5892021-07-02T19:15:37ZengThe Prognostics and Health Management SocietyInternational Journal of Prognostics and Health Management2153-26482153-26482015-12-0164doi:10.36001/ijphm.2015.v6i4.2325Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process FormulationBrian Bole0Kai Goebel1George Vachtsevanos2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94040NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94040Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332After an incipient fault mode has been detected a logical question to ask is: How long can the system continue to be operated before the incipient fault mode degrades to a failure condition? In many cases answering this question is complicated by the fact that further fault growth will depend on how the system is intended to be used in the future. The problem is then complicated even further when we consider that the future operation of a system may itself be conditioned on estimates of a system’s current health and on predictions of future fault evolution. This paper introduces a notationally convenient formulation of this problem as a Markov decision process. Prognostics-based fault management policies are then shown to be identified using standard Markov decision process optimization techniques. A case study example is analyzed, in which a discrete random walk is used to represent time-varying system loading demands. A comparison of fault management policies computed with and without future uncertainty is used to illustrate the limiting effects of model uncertainty on prognostics-informed fault management policies.https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2325prognosticsuncertainty managementasset health managementmarkov decision processrisk-reward trade-off
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brian Bole
Kai Goebel
George Vachtsevanos
spellingShingle Brian Bole
Kai Goebel
George Vachtsevanos
Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
prognostics
uncertainty management
asset health management
markov decision process
risk-reward trade-off
author_facet Brian Bole
Kai Goebel
George Vachtsevanos
author_sort Brian Bole
title Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation
title_short Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation
title_full Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation
title_fullStr Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation
title_full_unstemmed Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation
title_sort controlling tracking performance for system health management - a markov decision process formulation
publisher The Prognostics and Health Management Society
series International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
issn 2153-2648
2153-2648
publishDate 2015-12-01
description After an incipient fault mode has been detected a logical question to ask is: How long can the system continue to be operated before the incipient fault mode degrades to a failure condition? In many cases answering this question is complicated by the fact that further fault growth will depend on how the system is intended to be used in the future. The problem is then complicated even further when we consider that the future operation of a system may itself be conditioned on estimates of a system’s current health and on predictions of future fault evolution. This paper introduces a notationally convenient formulation of this problem as a Markov decision process. Prognostics-based fault management policies are then shown to be identified using standard Markov decision process optimization techniques. A case study example is analyzed, in which a discrete random walk is used to represent time-varying system loading demands. A comparison of fault management policies computed with and without future uncertainty is used to illustrate the limiting effects of model uncertainty on prognostics-informed fault management policies.
topic prognostics
uncertainty management
asset health management
markov decision process
risk-reward trade-off
url https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2325
work_keys_str_mv AT brianbole controllingtrackingperformanceforsystemhealthmanagementamarkovdecisionprocessformulation
AT kaigoebel controllingtrackingperformanceforsystemhealthmanagementamarkovdecisionprocessformulation
AT georgevachtsevanos controllingtrackingperformanceforsystemhealthmanagementamarkovdecisionprocessformulation
_version_ 1721323955381338112