Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation
After an incipient fault mode has been detected a logical question to ask is: How long can the system continue to be operated before the incipient fault mode degrades to a failure condition? In many cases answering this question is complicated by the fact that further fault growth will depend on how...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Prognostics and Health Management Society
2015-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2325 |
id |
doaj-8f11c9a874154402b7ce147945e5e589 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8f11c9a874154402b7ce147945e5e5892021-07-02T19:15:37ZengThe Prognostics and Health Management SocietyInternational Journal of Prognostics and Health Management2153-26482153-26482015-12-0164doi:10.36001/ijphm.2015.v6i4.2325Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process FormulationBrian Bole0Kai Goebel1George Vachtsevanos2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94040NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94040Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332After an incipient fault mode has been detected a logical question to ask is: How long can the system continue to be operated before the incipient fault mode degrades to a failure condition? In many cases answering this question is complicated by the fact that further fault growth will depend on how the system is intended to be used in the future. The problem is then complicated even further when we consider that the future operation of a system may itself be conditioned on estimates of a system’s current health and on predictions of future fault evolution. This paper introduces a notationally convenient formulation of this problem as a Markov decision process. Prognostics-based fault management policies are then shown to be identified using standard Markov decision process optimization techniques. A case study example is analyzed, in which a discrete random walk is used to represent time-varying system loading demands. A comparison of fault management policies computed with and without future uncertainty is used to illustrate the limiting effects of model uncertainty on prognostics-informed fault management policies.https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2325prognosticsuncertainty managementasset health managementmarkov decision processrisk-reward trade-off |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brian Bole Kai Goebel George Vachtsevanos |
spellingShingle |
Brian Bole Kai Goebel George Vachtsevanos Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management prognostics uncertainty management asset health management markov decision process risk-reward trade-off |
author_facet |
Brian Bole Kai Goebel George Vachtsevanos |
author_sort |
Brian Bole |
title |
Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation |
title_short |
Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation |
title_full |
Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation |
title_fullStr |
Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Controlling Tracking Performance for System Health Management - A Markov Decision Process Formulation |
title_sort |
controlling tracking performance for system health management - a markov decision process formulation |
publisher |
The Prognostics and Health Management Society |
series |
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management |
issn |
2153-2648 2153-2648 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
After an incipient fault mode has been detected a logical question to ask is: How long can the system continue to be operated before the incipient fault mode degrades to a failure condition? In many cases answering this question is complicated by the fact that further fault growth will depend on how the system is intended to be used in the future. The problem is then complicated even further when we consider that the future operation of a system may itself be conditioned on estimates of a system’s current health and on predictions of future fault evolution. This paper introduces a notationally convenient formulation of this problem as a Markov decision process. Prognostics-based fault management policies are then shown to be identified using standard Markov decision process optimization techniques. A case study example is analyzed, in which a discrete random walk is used to represent time-varying system loading demands. A comparison of fault management policies computed with and without future uncertainty is used to illustrate the limiting effects of model uncertainty on prognostics-informed fault management policies. |
topic |
prognostics uncertainty management asset health management markov decision process risk-reward trade-off |
url |
https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2325 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brianbole controllingtrackingperformanceforsystemhealthmanagementamarkovdecisionprocessformulation AT kaigoebel controllingtrackingperformanceforsystemhealthmanagementamarkovdecisionprocessformulation AT georgevachtsevanos controllingtrackingperformanceforsystemhealthmanagementamarkovdecisionprocessformulation |
_version_ |
1721323955381338112 |