Historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke

Abstract Background There is no shortage of books, chapters and papers on the history of stroke focusing predominantly on the last 150 years and enumerating endless “milestones”. Instead of adding another article to this body of knowledge, this essay aims at ensuring awareness for the “big picture”,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Axel Karenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:Neurological Research and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00082-0
id doaj-8f0ba5fd9a834e048a0f6b03b2a2917c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f0ba5fd9a834e048a0f6b03b2a2917c2020-12-06T12:33:15ZengBMCNeurological Research and Practice2524-34892020-12-012111110.1186/s42466-020-00082-0Historic review: select chapters of a history of strokeAxel Karenberg0Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, University of CologneAbstract Background There is no shortage of books, chapters and papers on the history of stroke focusing predominantly on the last 150 years and enumerating endless “milestones”. Instead of adding another article to this body of knowledge, this essay aims at ensuring awareness for the “big picture”, the “grandes routes”, and the “striking breakes” without overloading the reader with too much detail. Results From a medical point of view, the history of stroke consists of two periods: the early era from the beginnings to 1812, and the following period from 1812 up to the present. It is argued that both periods require different methodical approaches, including disparate historiographical perspectives and varying forms of interpretation. In order to fully understand medical writings of the Greco-Roman era (Hippocratic writings, Galenic corpus) on “apoplexy”, a solid knowledge of ancient doctrines concerning health and disease is indispensable. During the Middle Ages, the spiritual perspective can be highlighted by focusing on miracle healing and patron saints. While stroke basically remained a conundrum for many doctors and patients in early modern times (ca. 1500–1800; Platter, Wepfer), the revolutionary perception and definition of the disease as a result of a lesion in the 1810s (Rochoux, Rostan) opened the door to a productive relationship of the upcoming discipline “neurology” with the natural sciences during the nineteenth century and beyond (Virchow et al.). The mostly unwritten history of stroke in the twentieth century should not only include the medical, but also the patient’s and the societal perspective. Conclusion A deeper insight into the recent and distant past will produce better educated strokologists – physicians who are able to put their own work into perspective.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00082-0Stroke/historyCerebrovascular disorders/historyIntracranial hemorrhages/historyParalysis/historyNeurology/historyStroke/pathology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Axel Karenberg
spellingShingle Axel Karenberg
Historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke
Neurological Research and Practice
Stroke/history
Cerebrovascular disorders/history
Intracranial hemorrhages/history
Paralysis/history
Neurology/history
Stroke/pathology
author_facet Axel Karenberg
author_sort Axel Karenberg
title Historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke
title_short Historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke
title_full Historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke
title_fullStr Historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke
title_full_unstemmed Historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke
title_sort historic review: select chapters of a history of stroke
publisher BMC
series Neurological Research and Practice
issn 2524-3489
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract Background There is no shortage of books, chapters and papers on the history of stroke focusing predominantly on the last 150 years and enumerating endless “milestones”. Instead of adding another article to this body of knowledge, this essay aims at ensuring awareness for the “big picture”, the “grandes routes”, and the “striking breakes” without overloading the reader with too much detail. Results From a medical point of view, the history of stroke consists of two periods: the early era from the beginnings to 1812, and the following period from 1812 up to the present. It is argued that both periods require different methodical approaches, including disparate historiographical perspectives and varying forms of interpretation. In order to fully understand medical writings of the Greco-Roman era (Hippocratic writings, Galenic corpus) on “apoplexy”, a solid knowledge of ancient doctrines concerning health and disease is indispensable. During the Middle Ages, the spiritual perspective can be highlighted by focusing on miracle healing and patron saints. While stroke basically remained a conundrum for many doctors and patients in early modern times (ca. 1500–1800; Platter, Wepfer), the revolutionary perception and definition of the disease as a result of a lesion in the 1810s (Rochoux, Rostan) opened the door to a productive relationship of the upcoming discipline “neurology” with the natural sciences during the nineteenth century and beyond (Virchow et al.). The mostly unwritten history of stroke in the twentieth century should not only include the medical, but also the patient’s and the societal perspective. Conclusion A deeper insight into the recent and distant past will produce better educated strokologists – physicians who are able to put their own work into perspective.
topic Stroke/history
Cerebrovascular disorders/history
Intracranial hemorrhages/history
Paralysis/history
Neurology/history
Stroke/pathology
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00082-0
work_keys_str_mv AT axelkarenberg historicreviewselectchaptersofahistoryofstroke
_version_ 1724398647782670336