Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building Models

The authors describe two approaches to the construction of three-dimensional models of wooden objects on the example of building No. 41, found in the excavation “Tatar Slobodka” in the village of Sviyazhsk in 2011–2014. The first approach is to photograph the assembled space in the building and cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vafina Gulnur Kh., Ovechkina Lyudmila V., Sadriev Nail R., Starkov Andrej S.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: TAS 2018-12-01
Series:Povolžskaâ Arheologiâ
Subjects:
Online Access:http://archaeologie.pro/en/archive/26/511/
id doaj-8ef5ef92f3d94e7fab8a3b6c3bbadf6c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ef5ef92f3d94e7fab8a3b6c3bbadf6c2020-11-25T01:50:49ZrusTASPovolžskaâ Arheologiâ2306-40992500-28562018-12-0142619320210.24852/2018.4.26.193.202Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building ModelsVafina Gulnur Kh. 0Ovechkina Lyudmila V.1Sadriev Nail R.2Starkov Andrej S.3Institute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Khalikov, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences. Butlerov Str., 30, Kazan, 420012, the Republic of Tatarstan, Russian FederationInstitute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Khalikov, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences. Butlerov Str., 30, Kazan, 420012, the Republic of Tatarstan, Russian FederationInstitute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Khalikov, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences. Butlerov Str., 30, Kazan, 420012, the Republic of Tatarstan, Russian FederationInstitute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Khalikov, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences. Butlerov Str., 30, Kazan, 420012, the Republic of Tatarstan, Russian FederationThe authors describe two approaches to the construction of three-dimensional models of wooden objects on the example of building No. 41, found in the excavation “Tatar Slobodka” in the village of Sviyazhsk in 2011–2014. The first approach is to photograph the assembled space in the building and continue its construction in the program Agisoft Photoscan. The model obtained in this way, has been called by the authors "monolithic". The second approach is based on the collection of structures on a single platform from individual models of wooden elements that make up its structure. Thus a "combined" model has been constructed by the authors. Two approaches was based on photogrammetry methods. In the course of the study, a comparison was made between the methods of obtaining "monolithic" and "composite" models, each of which has a number of advantages and disadvantages. "Monolithic" is characterized by high speed of the model and a small amount of memory. "Сombined" model allows you to compose the model of the building from the elements in the computer without its actual collection in space.http://archaeologie.pro/en/archive/26/511/archaeologyphotogrammetrySviyazhskconstructionthree-dimensional model"monolithic" model"composite" model
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vafina Gulnur Kh.
Ovechkina Lyudmila V.
Sadriev Nail R.
Starkov Andrej S.
spellingShingle Vafina Gulnur Kh.
Ovechkina Lyudmila V.
Sadriev Nail R.
Starkov Andrej S.
Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building Models
Povolžskaâ Arheologiâ
archaeology
photogrammetry
Sviyazhsk
construction
three-dimensional model
"monolithic" model
"composite" model
author_facet Vafina Gulnur Kh.
Ovechkina Lyudmila V.
Sadriev Nail R.
Starkov Andrej S.
author_sort Vafina Gulnur Kh.
title Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building Models
title_short Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building Models
title_full Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building Models
title_fullStr Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building Models
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to the Generation of Three-Dimensional Building Models
title_sort approaches to the generation of three-dimensional building models
publisher TAS
series Povolžskaâ Arheologiâ
issn 2306-4099
2500-2856
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The authors describe two approaches to the construction of three-dimensional models of wooden objects on the example of building No. 41, found in the excavation “Tatar Slobodka” in the village of Sviyazhsk in 2011–2014. The first approach is to photograph the assembled space in the building and continue its construction in the program Agisoft Photoscan. The model obtained in this way, has been called by the authors "monolithic". The second approach is based on the collection of structures on a single platform from individual models of wooden elements that make up its structure. Thus a "combined" model has been constructed by the authors. Two approaches was based on photogrammetry methods. In the course of the study, a comparison was made between the methods of obtaining "monolithic" and "composite" models, each of which has a number of advantages and disadvantages. "Monolithic" is characterized by high speed of the model and a small amount of memory. "Сombined" model allows you to compose the model of the building from the elements in the computer without its actual collection in space.
topic archaeology
photogrammetry
Sviyazhsk
construction
three-dimensional model
"monolithic" model
"composite" model
url http://archaeologie.pro/en/archive/26/511/
work_keys_str_mv AT vafinagulnurkh approachestothegenerationofthreedimensionalbuildingmodels
AT ovechkinalyudmilav approachestothegenerationofthreedimensionalbuildingmodels
AT sadrievnailr approachestothegenerationofthreedimensionalbuildingmodels
AT starkovandrejs approachestothegenerationofthreedimensionalbuildingmodels
_version_ 1725000430280245248