Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.

Key innovations are disruptive evolutionary events that enable a species to escape constraints and rapidly diversify. After 15 years of the Lenski long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli, cells in one of the twelve populations evolved the ability to utilize citrate, an abundant but prev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dacia Leon, Simon D'Alton, Erik M Quandt, Jeffrey E Barrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-04-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5918244?pdf=render
id doaj-8ef42b3361914b5884d579a1aa1f8f93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ef42b3361914b5884d579a1aa1f8f932020-11-24T22:20:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042018-04-01144e100734810.1371/journal.pgen.1007348Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.Dacia LeonSimon D'AltonErik M QuandtJeffrey E BarrickKey innovations are disruptive evolutionary events that enable a species to escape constraints and rapidly diversify. After 15 years of the Lenski long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli, cells in one of the twelve populations evolved the ability to utilize citrate, an abundant but previously untapped carbon source in the environment. Descendants of these cells became dominant in the population and subsequently diversified as a consequence of invading this vacant niche. Mutations responsible for the appearance of rudimentary citrate utilization and for refining this ability have been characterized. However, the complete nature of the genetic and/or ecological events that set the stage for this key innovation is unknown. In particular, it is unclear why it took so long for citrate utilization to evolve and why it still has evolved in only one of the twelve E. coli populations after 30 years of the Lenski experiment. In this study, we recapitulated the initial mutation needed to evolve citrate utilization in strains isolated from throughout the first 31,500 generations of the history of this population. We found that there was already a slight fitness benefit for this mutation in the original ancestor of the evolution experiment and in other early isolates. However, evolution of citrate utilization was blocked at this point due to competition with other mutations that improved fitness in the original niche. Subsequently, an anti-potentiated genetic background evolved in which it was deleterious to evolve rudimentary citrate utilization. Only later, after further mutations accumulated that restored the benefit of this first-step mutation and the overall rate of adaptation in the population slowed, was citrate utilization likely to evolve. Thus, intense competition and the types of mutations that it favors can lead to short-sighted evolutionary trajectories that hide a stepping stone needed to access a key innovation from many future generations.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5918244?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dacia Leon
Simon D'Alton
Erik M Quandt
Jeffrey E Barrick
spellingShingle Dacia Leon
Simon D'Alton
Erik M Quandt
Jeffrey E Barrick
Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
PLoS Genetics
author_facet Dacia Leon
Simon D'Alton
Erik M Quandt
Jeffrey E Barrick
author_sort Dacia Leon
title Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
title_short Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
title_full Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
title_fullStr Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
title_full_unstemmed Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
title_sort innovation in an e. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Genetics
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Key innovations are disruptive evolutionary events that enable a species to escape constraints and rapidly diversify. After 15 years of the Lenski long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli, cells in one of the twelve populations evolved the ability to utilize citrate, an abundant but previously untapped carbon source in the environment. Descendants of these cells became dominant in the population and subsequently diversified as a consequence of invading this vacant niche. Mutations responsible for the appearance of rudimentary citrate utilization and for refining this ability have been characterized. However, the complete nature of the genetic and/or ecological events that set the stage for this key innovation is unknown. In particular, it is unclear why it took so long for citrate utilization to evolve and why it still has evolved in only one of the twelve E. coli populations after 30 years of the Lenski experiment. In this study, we recapitulated the initial mutation needed to evolve citrate utilization in strains isolated from throughout the first 31,500 generations of the history of this population. We found that there was already a slight fitness benefit for this mutation in the original ancestor of the evolution experiment and in other early isolates. However, evolution of citrate utilization was blocked at this point due to competition with other mutations that improved fitness in the original niche. Subsequently, an anti-potentiated genetic background evolved in which it was deleterious to evolve rudimentary citrate utilization. Only later, after further mutations accumulated that restored the benefit of this first-step mutation and the overall rate of adaptation in the population slowed, was citrate utilization likely to evolve. Thus, intense competition and the types of mutations that it favors can lead to short-sighted evolutionary trajectories that hide a stepping stone needed to access a key innovation from many future generations.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5918244?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT dacialeon innovationinanecolievolutionexperimentiscontingentonmaintainingadaptivepotentialuntilcompetitionsubsides
AT simondalton innovationinanecolievolutionexperimentiscontingentonmaintainingadaptivepotentialuntilcompetitionsubsides
AT erikmquandt innovationinanecolievolutionexperimentiscontingentonmaintainingadaptivepotentialuntilcompetitionsubsides
AT jeffreyebarrick innovationinanecolievolutionexperimentiscontingentonmaintainingadaptivepotentialuntilcompetitionsubsides
_version_ 1725776046251311104