Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory Stimuli

In the last few decades experimental aesthetics studies mainly focused on objective features of sensory stimuli in attempts to identify determinants of aesthetic preference. However, recent research has addressed the role of evaluative or affective meaning in aesthetic preference of sensory stimuli....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dragan Jankovic, Jasmina Stevanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-10-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/ic951
id doaj-8ea85a49bc1440fd886b4853ca1e48b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ea85a49bc1440fd886b4853ca1e48b92020-11-25T03:45:05ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952011-10-01210.1068/ic95110.1068_ic951Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory StimuliDragan Jankovic0Jasmina Stevanov1University of BelgradeRitsumeikan UniversityIn the last few decades experimental aesthetics studies mainly focused on objective features of sensory stimuli in attempts to identify determinants of aesthetic preference. However, recent research has addressed the role of evaluative or affective meaning in aesthetic preference of sensory stimuli. Here we examined underlying structure of evaluative meaning for three types of sensory stimuli and the relations between obtained dimensions and aesthetic preference of stimuli from different sensory modalities. In three experiments participants assessed visual, auditory and gustatory stimuli on the aesthetic preference scale and on three instruments involving evaluative attributes people usually use to describe their subjective experience of visual, auditory and gustatory domains. The results of principal component analysis showed the same triple factorial structure for different sensory modalities: affective evaluation (pleasant, positive, relaxing), arousal (impressive, powerful, interesting), and cognitive evaluation (familiar, meaningful, regular). Obtained evaluative dimensions explained most of the variance in aesthetic preference for all three types of sensory stimuli. In particular, there was strong relation of affective and cognitive evaluation with aesthetic preference, while arousal demonstrated weaker relation. Finally, we proposed the view of aesthetic preference of sensory stimuli based on three underlying dimensions of affective meaning.https://doi.org/10.1068/ic951
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dragan Jankovic
Jasmina Stevanov
spellingShingle Dragan Jankovic
Jasmina Stevanov
Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory Stimuli
i-Perception
author_facet Dragan Jankovic
Jasmina Stevanov
author_sort Dragan Jankovic
title Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory Stimuli
title_short Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory Stimuli
title_full Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory Stimuli
title_fullStr Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory Stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Similarities in Affective Processing and Aesthetic Preference of Visual, Auditory and Gustatory Stimuli
title_sort similarities in affective processing and aesthetic preference of visual, auditory and gustatory stimuli
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2011-10-01
description In the last few decades experimental aesthetics studies mainly focused on objective features of sensory stimuli in attempts to identify determinants of aesthetic preference. However, recent research has addressed the role of evaluative or affective meaning in aesthetic preference of sensory stimuli. Here we examined underlying structure of evaluative meaning for three types of sensory stimuli and the relations between obtained dimensions and aesthetic preference of stimuli from different sensory modalities. In three experiments participants assessed visual, auditory and gustatory stimuli on the aesthetic preference scale and on three instruments involving evaluative attributes people usually use to describe their subjective experience of visual, auditory and gustatory domains. The results of principal component analysis showed the same triple factorial structure for different sensory modalities: affective evaluation (pleasant, positive, relaxing), arousal (impressive, powerful, interesting), and cognitive evaluation (familiar, meaningful, regular). Obtained evaluative dimensions explained most of the variance in aesthetic preference for all three types of sensory stimuli. In particular, there was strong relation of affective and cognitive evaluation with aesthetic preference, while arousal demonstrated weaker relation. Finally, we proposed the view of aesthetic preference of sensory stimuli based on three underlying dimensions of affective meaning.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/ic951
work_keys_str_mv AT draganjankovic similaritiesinaffectiveprocessingandaestheticpreferenceofvisualauditoryandgustatorystimuli
AT jasminastevanov similaritiesinaffectiveprocessingandaestheticpreferenceofvisualauditoryandgustatorystimuli
_version_ 1724511528060715008