The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)

This study aims to test two principles of code-switching (CS) formulated by González Vilbazo (2005): The Principle of the Functional Restriction (PFR) and the Principle of Agreement (PA). The first states that a code-switch between the morphological exponents of functional heads belonging to the sam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aurélia Robert-Tissot, Etienne Morel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-07-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
SMS
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/2/3/10
id doaj-8ea246b94ba54ee3bd299d4128fdc956
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ea246b94ba54ee3bd299d4128fdc9562020-11-25T00:16:18ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2017-07-01231010.3390/languages2030010languages2030010The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)Aurélia Robert-Tissot0Etienne Morel1Romanisches Seminar, University of Zurich, Zürichbergstrasse 8, CH-8032 Zürich, SwitzerlandRomanisches Seminar, University of Zurich, Zürichbergstrasse 8, CH-8032 Zürich, SwitzerlandThis study aims to test two principles of code-switching (CS) formulated by González Vilbazo (2005): The Principle of the Functional Restriction (PFR) and the Principle of Agreement (PA). The first states that a code-switch between the morphological exponents of functional heads belonging to the same extended projection of a lexical category (N° or V°) is not possible. The second claims that inside a phrase, agreement requirements have to be satisfied, regardless of the language providing the lexical material. The corpus on which we tested these hypotheses consists of 25,947 authentic text messages collected in Switzerland in 2009 and 2010. In our corpus, the PA is maintained. The PFR also seems to hold, even if data is limited. Interestingly, contradicting examples can be explained by phonological principles or the sociolinguistic background of the authors, who are not native speakers. Overall, the evidence found in spontaneously written non-standard data like text messages seems to confirm the validity of the two principles.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/2/3/10code-switchingSMSsyntactic principlefunctional restrictionagreement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aurélia Robert-Tissot
Etienne Morel
spellingShingle Aurélia Robert-Tissot
Etienne Morel
The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)
Languages
code-switching
SMS
syntactic principle
functional restriction
agreement
author_facet Aurélia Robert-Tissot
Etienne Morel
author_sort Aurélia Robert-Tissot
title The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)
title_short The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)
title_full The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)
title_fullStr The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Functional Heads in Code-Switching Evidence from Swiss Text Messages (sms4science.ch)
title_sort role of functional heads in code-switching evidence from swiss text messages (sms4science.ch)
publisher MDPI AG
series Languages
issn 2226-471X
publishDate 2017-07-01
description This study aims to test two principles of code-switching (CS) formulated by González Vilbazo (2005): The Principle of the Functional Restriction (PFR) and the Principle of Agreement (PA). The first states that a code-switch between the morphological exponents of functional heads belonging to the same extended projection of a lexical category (N° or V°) is not possible. The second claims that inside a phrase, agreement requirements have to be satisfied, regardless of the language providing the lexical material. The corpus on which we tested these hypotheses consists of 25,947 authentic text messages collected in Switzerland in 2009 and 2010. In our corpus, the PA is maintained. The PFR also seems to hold, even if data is limited. Interestingly, contradicting examples can be explained by phonological principles or the sociolinguistic background of the authors, who are not native speakers. Overall, the evidence found in spontaneously written non-standard data like text messages seems to confirm the validity of the two principles.
topic code-switching
SMS
syntactic principle
functional restriction
agreement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/2/3/10
work_keys_str_mv AT aureliaroberttissot theroleoffunctionalheadsincodeswitchingevidencefromswisstextmessagessms4sciencech
AT etiennemorel theroleoffunctionalheadsincodeswitchingevidencefromswisstextmessagessms4sciencech
AT aureliaroberttissot roleoffunctionalheadsincodeswitchingevidencefromswisstextmessagessms4sciencech
AT etiennemorel roleoffunctionalheadsincodeswitchingevidencefromswisstextmessagessms4sciencech
_version_ 1725383395078307840