Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity

The article presents a review of the English language publications concerning the history and the current state of differential psychological assessment of validity of testimonies produced by child and adolescent victims of crimes. The topicality of the problem in Russia is high due to the tendency...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dozortseva E.G., Afanasyeva A.G.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2015-12-01
Series:Современная зарубежная психология
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psyjournals.ru/files/79077/jmfp_2015_3_n6_Dozortseva.pdf
id doaj-8e8829208f4e47588af32afef1db648f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e8829208f4e47588af32afef1db648f2020-11-25T03:18:47ZrusMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationСовременная зарубежная психология2304-49772015-12-0143475610.17759/jmfp.2015040306Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validityDozortseva E.G.0Afanasyeva A.G.1Moscow State University of Psychology and EducationMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationThe article presents a review of the English language publications concerning the history and the current state of differential psychological assessment of validity of testimonies produced by child and adolescent victims of crimes. The topicality of the problem in Russia is high due to the tendency of Russian specialists to use methodical means and instruments developed abroad in this sphere for forensic assessments of witness testimony veracity. A system of Statement Validity Analysis (SVA) by means of Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) and Validity Checklist is described. The results of laboratory and field studies of validity of CBCA criteria on the basis of child and adult witnesses are discussed. The data display a good differentiating capacity of the method, however, a high level of error probability. The researchers recommend implementation of SVA in the criminal investigation process, but not in the forensic assessment. New perspective developments in the field of methods for differentiation of witness statements based on the real experience and fictional are noted. The conclusion is drawn that empirical studies and a special work for adaptation and development of new approaches should precede their implementation into Russian criminal investigation and forensic assessment practicehttp://psyjournals.ru/files/79077/jmfp_2015_3_n6_Dozortseva.pdftestimonieschild and adolescent witnessesstatement validitystatement validity assessment (SVA)Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA)criminal investigationforensic psychological assessment
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dozortseva E.G.
Afanasyeva A.G.
spellingShingle Dozortseva E.G.
Afanasyeva A.G.
Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
Современная зарубежная психология
testimonies
child and adolescent witnesses
statement validity
statement validity assessment (SVA)
Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA)
criminal investigation
forensic psychological assessment
author_facet Dozortseva E.G.
Afanasyeva A.G.
author_sort Dozortseva E.G.
title Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
title_short Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
title_full Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
title_fullStr Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
title_sort assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
series Современная зарубежная психология
issn 2304-4977
publishDate 2015-12-01
description The article presents a review of the English language publications concerning the history and the current state of differential psychological assessment of validity of testimonies produced by child and adolescent victims of crimes. The topicality of the problem in Russia is high due to the tendency of Russian specialists to use methodical means and instruments developed abroad in this sphere for forensic assessments of witness testimony veracity. A system of Statement Validity Analysis (SVA) by means of Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) and Validity Checklist is described. The results of laboratory and field studies of validity of CBCA criteria on the basis of child and adult witnesses are discussed. The data display a good differentiating capacity of the method, however, a high level of error probability. The researchers recommend implementation of SVA in the criminal investigation process, but not in the forensic assessment. New perspective developments in the field of methods for differentiation of witness statements based on the real experience and fictional are noted. The conclusion is drawn that empirical studies and a special work for adaptation and development of new approaches should precede their implementation into Russian criminal investigation and forensic assessment practice
topic testimonies
child and adolescent witnesses
statement validity
statement validity assessment (SVA)
Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA)
criminal investigation
forensic psychological assessment
url http://psyjournals.ru/files/79077/jmfp_2015_3_n6_Dozortseva.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dozortsevaeg assessmentofjuvenilestestimoniesvalidity
AT afanasyevaag assessmentofjuvenilestestimoniesvalidity
_version_ 1724625825370734592