The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order
In this paper, we first attempt to track post-WWII shifts in the balance of power between a number of big powers in the international system. By relying on a number of possible proxies for power in the international arena, we argue that what the international system is going through today is not a r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/495 |
id |
doaj-8e86287ebfd848a69778193c3b4a1322 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e86287ebfd848a69778193c3b4a13222021-08-31T06:10:29ZengАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право2542-02402587-93242019-11-0112317018810.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-3-170-188406The Emerging New Global (Dis)OrderP. Magri0Italian Institute of International Political Studies (ISPI)In this paper, we first attempt to track post-WWII shifts in the balance of power between a number of big powers in the international system. By relying on a number of possible proxies for power in the international arena, we argue that what the international system is going through today is not a relatively indiscriminate diffusion of power from the centre towards the periphery, but a marked rise of China that seems to have left the rest of the “emerging world” behind. We then delve deeper into the foreign policies of the US and China, the two main powers in this seemingly neo-bipolar system. We find that risks of confrontation are rising. On the one hand, this is related to the US’s continued preference for a strategy bent on “primacy”, rather than on strategic restraint. On the other hand, Beijing’s foreign policy is growing increasingly assertive, and does not hide anymore within the rhetoric of the “peaceful rise”. We conclude by showing that this shift in international power, coupled by the grand strategies preferred by China and the US, are imperilling the fragile scaffolding of global governance. The risk is that, rather than leading us towards a new but sustainable global order, the transition will only lead us backwards: to a world in which rules are less confidently upholded, and where the logic of the balance of power and of arms races further gains momentum.https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/495international politicsfuture trendspower politicsglobal governancebig-power competitionus foreign policychinese foreign policy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. Magri |
spellingShingle |
P. Magri The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право international politics future trends power politics global governance big-power competition us foreign policy chinese foreign policy |
author_facet |
P. Magri |
author_sort |
P. Magri |
title |
The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order |
title_short |
The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order |
title_full |
The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order |
title_fullStr |
The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order |
title_sort |
emerging new global (dis)order |
publisher |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) |
series |
Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |
issn |
2542-0240 2587-9324 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
In this paper, we first attempt to track post-WWII shifts in the balance of power between a number of big powers in the international system. By relying on a number of possible proxies for power in the international arena, we argue that what the international system is going through today is not a relatively indiscriminate diffusion of power from the centre towards the periphery, but a marked rise of China that seems to have left the rest of the “emerging world” behind. We then delve deeper into the foreign policies of the US and China, the two main powers in this seemingly neo-bipolar system. We find that risks of confrontation are rising. On the one hand, this is related to the US’s continued preference for a strategy bent on “primacy”, rather than on strategic restraint. On the other hand, Beijing’s foreign policy is growing increasingly assertive, and does not hide anymore within the rhetoric of the “peaceful rise”. We conclude by showing that this shift in international power, coupled by the grand strategies preferred by China and the US, are imperilling the fragile scaffolding of global governance. The risk is that, rather than leading us towards a new but sustainable global order, the transition will only lead us backwards: to a world in which rules are less confidently upholded, and where the logic of the balance of power and of arms races further gains momentum. |
topic |
international politics future trends power politics global governance big-power competition us foreign policy chinese foreign policy |
url |
https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/495 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pmagri theemergingnewglobaldisorder AT pmagri emergingnewglobaldisorder |
_version_ |
1721184079809871872 |