Events and the Critique of Ideology

This paper defends the claim that the critique of ideology requires creative interventions in the symbolic order of society and that those creative interventions must be understood as events. This is what animates the work of both Ricoeur and Deleuze and yet helps to uncover the fundamental differen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iain MacKenzie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2012-06-01
Series:Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/121
id doaj-8e79b05a91244e28ab9afa72ed1e12a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e79b05a91244e28ab9afa72ed1e12a62020-11-24T21:52:54ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghÉtudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies2156-78082012-06-013110211310.5195/errs.2012.12145Events and the Critique of IdeologyIain MacKenzie0University of KentThis paper defends the claim that the critique of ideology requires creative interventions in the symbolic order of society and that those creative interventions must be understood as events. This is what animates the work of both Ricoeur and Deleuze and yet helps to uncover the fundamental difference between them regarding the conditions that make such critique possible: a difference regarding how we understand the nature of events. While Ricoeur is the philosopher of the narrated event, Deleuze is the philosopher of the dramatic event. Instead of pursuing a point-by-point comparison of their respective philosophies of the event, a line of social and political inquiry is constructed that leads from Ricoeur to Deleuze with a view to establishing at what point these two thinkers take different paths. It will be argued that the crossroads is rather neatly signposted by Meillassoux’s critique of strong correlationism in After Finitude.http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/121Ricoeur, Deleuze, Meillassoux, Events, Ideology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iain MacKenzie
spellingShingle Iain MacKenzie
Events and the Critique of Ideology
Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
Ricoeur, Deleuze, Meillassoux, Events, Ideology
author_facet Iain MacKenzie
author_sort Iain MacKenzie
title Events and the Critique of Ideology
title_short Events and the Critique of Ideology
title_full Events and the Critique of Ideology
title_fullStr Events and the Critique of Ideology
title_full_unstemmed Events and the Critique of Ideology
title_sort events and the critique of ideology
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
issn 2156-7808
publishDate 2012-06-01
description This paper defends the claim that the critique of ideology requires creative interventions in the symbolic order of society and that those creative interventions must be understood as events. This is what animates the work of both Ricoeur and Deleuze and yet helps to uncover the fundamental difference between them regarding the conditions that make such critique possible: a difference regarding how we understand the nature of events. While Ricoeur is the philosopher of the narrated event, Deleuze is the philosopher of the dramatic event. Instead of pursuing a point-by-point comparison of their respective philosophies of the event, a line of social and political inquiry is constructed that leads from Ricoeur to Deleuze with a view to establishing at what point these two thinkers take different paths. It will be argued that the crossroads is rather neatly signposted by Meillassoux’s critique of strong correlationism in After Finitude.
topic Ricoeur, Deleuze, Meillassoux, Events, Ideology
url http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/121
work_keys_str_mv AT iainmackenzie eventsandthecritiqueofideology
_version_ 1725874211932602368