Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making

Objective: To understand librarians’ evidence-based practice (EBP) professional development needs and assist library administrators with professional development decisions in their own institutions, the study team surveyed past participants of an EBP online course. This study aimed to (1) understand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deborah L. Lauseng, Carmen Howard, Emily M. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of the Medical Library Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/628
id doaj-8e732bf5e6a74d1e9b3777457c228713
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e732bf5e6a74d1e9b3777457c2287132020-11-25T01:14:52ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of the Medical Library Association1536-50501558-94392019-07-01107310.5195/jmla.2019.628376Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision makingDeborah L. Lauseng0Carmen Howard1Emily M. Johnson2Assistant Professor and Regional Head Librarian, Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria, University of Illinois at Chicago, Peoria, ILInstructor and Regional Health Sciences Librarian, Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria, University of Illinois at Chicago, Peoria, ILAssistant Professor and Regional Health Sciences Librarian, Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria, University of Illinois at Chicago, Peoria, ILObjective: To understand librarians’ evidence-based practice (EBP) professional development needs and assist library administrators with professional development decisions in their own institutions, the study team surveyed past participants of an EBP online course. This study aimed to (1) understand what course content participants found valuable, (2) discover how participants applied their course learning to their work, and (3) identify which aspects of EBP would be beneficial for future continuing education. Methods: The study team distributed an eighteen-question survey to past participants of the course (2011–2017). The survey covered nontraditional demographic information, course evaluations, course content applications to participants’ work, additional EBP training, and EBP topics for future CE opportunities. The study team analyzed the results using descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-nine percent of course participants, representing different library environments, responded to the survey. Eighty-five percent of respondents indicated that they had prior EBP training. The most valuable topics were searching the literature (62%) and developing a problem, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question (59%). Critical appraisal was highly rated for further professional development. Fifty-three percent indicated change in their work efforts after participating in the course. Ninety-seven percent noted interest in further EBP continuing education. Conclusions: Survey respondents found value in both familiar and unfamiliar EBP topics, which supported the idea of using professional development for learning new concepts and reinforcing existing knowledge and skills. When given the opportunity to engage in these activities, librarians can experience new or expanded EBP work roles and responsibilities. Additionally, the results provide library administrators insights into the benefit of EBP professional development.http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/628Professional DevelopmentEvidence-Based PracticeOnline CourseLibrariansLibrary Administrators
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deborah L. Lauseng
Carmen Howard
Emily M. Johnson
spellingShingle Deborah L. Lauseng
Carmen Howard
Emily M. Johnson
Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Professional Development
Evidence-Based Practice
Online Course
Librarians
Library Administrators
author_facet Deborah L. Lauseng
Carmen Howard
Emily M. Johnson
author_sort Deborah L. Lauseng
title Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making
title_short Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making
title_full Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making
title_fullStr Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making
title_full_unstemmed Professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making
title_sort professional development in evidence-based practice: course survey results to inform administrative decision making
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of the Medical Library Association
issn 1536-5050
1558-9439
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Objective: To understand librarians’ evidence-based practice (EBP) professional development needs and assist library administrators with professional development decisions in their own institutions, the study team surveyed past participants of an EBP online course. This study aimed to (1) understand what course content participants found valuable, (2) discover how participants applied their course learning to their work, and (3) identify which aspects of EBP would be beneficial for future continuing education. Methods: The study team distributed an eighteen-question survey to past participants of the course (2011–2017). The survey covered nontraditional demographic information, course evaluations, course content applications to participants’ work, additional EBP training, and EBP topics for future CE opportunities. The study team analyzed the results using descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-nine percent of course participants, representing different library environments, responded to the survey. Eighty-five percent of respondents indicated that they had prior EBP training. The most valuable topics were searching the literature (62%) and developing a problem, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question (59%). Critical appraisal was highly rated for further professional development. Fifty-three percent indicated change in their work efforts after participating in the course. Ninety-seven percent noted interest in further EBP continuing education. Conclusions: Survey respondents found value in both familiar and unfamiliar EBP topics, which supported the idea of using professional development for learning new concepts and reinforcing existing knowledge and skills. When given the opportunity to engage in these activities, librarians can experience new or expanded EBP work roles and responsibilities. Additionally, the results provide library administrators insights into the benefit of EBP professional development.
topic Professional Development
Evidence-Based Practice
Online Course
Librarians
Library Administrators
url http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/628
work_keys_str_mv AT deborahllauseng professionaldevelopmentinevidencebasedpracticecoursesurveyresultstoinformadministrativedecisionmaking
AT carmenhoward professionaldevelopmentinevidencebasedpracticecoursesurveyresultstoinformadministrativedecisionmaking
AT emilymjohnson professionaldevelopmentinevidencebasedpracticecoursesurveyresultstoinformadministrativedecisionmaking
_version_ 1725156003107831808