Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study

Abstract Objective The angle of the C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope, which is used for difficult airway interventions, is not compatible with routinely used endotracheal tubes. Methods A prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing five intubation methods for use with standardiz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dilek Ömür, Başak Bayram, Şule Özbilgin, Volkan Hancı, Bahar Kuvaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
Series:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500450&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-8e7214dfcca84d0fa602b7a189148e2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e7214dfcca84d0fa602b7a189148e2b2020-11-24T23:39:52ZengSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia1806-907X67545045610.1016/j.bjane.2016.06.001S0034-70942017000500450Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled studyDilek ÖmürBaşak BayramŞule ÖzbilginVolkan HancıBahar KuvakiAbstract Objective The angle of the C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope, which is used for difficult airway interventions, is not compatible with routinely used endotracheal tubes. Methods A prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing five intubation methods for use with standardized airways, including using different stylets or no stylet: Group HS, hockey-stick stylet; Group DS, D-blade type stylet; Group CS, CoPilot® videolaryngoscope rigid stylet®; Group GEB, gum elastic bougie; and Group NS, no stylet. A manikin was used to simulate difficult intubation with a Storz C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope. The duration of each intubation stage was evaluated. Results Participants in this study (33 anesthesiology residents and 20 anesthesiology experts) completed a total of 265 intubations. The number of attempts made using no stylet was significantly greater than those made for the other groups (p < 0.05 for group NS- group GEB, group NS- group DS, group NS- group CS and group NS- group HS). The duration to pass the vocal cords significantly differed among all groups (p < 0.001). The total intubation duration was shortest when using D-blade stylet, CoPilot stylet and hockey stick stylet. Although no difference was observed between stylet groups, a significant difference was found between each of these three and no stylet and gum elastic bougie (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Use of the correct stylet leads to a more efficient use of the Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. In our study, the use of the D-blade stylet, the CoPilot stylet and the hockey stick stylet provided quicker intubation, allowed easier passage of the vocal cords, and decreased the total intubation duration. To confirm the findings of our study, randomized controlled human studies are needed.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500450&lng=en&tlng=enVideolaringoscópio C-MAC D-Blade®IntubaçãoEstileteManequim
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dilek Ömür
Başak Bayram
Şule Özbilgin
Volkan Hancı
Bahar Kuvaki
spellingShingle Dilek Ömür
Başak Bayram
Şule Özbilgin
Volkan Hancı
Bahar Kuvaki
Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
Videolaringoscópio C-MAC D-Blade®
Intubação
Estilete
Manequim
author_facet Dilek Ömür
Başak Bayram
Şule Özbilgin
Volkan Hancı
Bahar Kuvaki
author_sort Dilek Ömür
title Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study
title_short Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study
title_full Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study
title_sort comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the c-mac d-blade® videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
series Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
issn 1806-907X
description Abstract Objective The angle of the C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope, which is used for difficult airway interventions, is not compatible with routinely used endotracheal tubes. Methods A prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing five intubation methods for use with standardized airways, including using different stylets or no stylet: Group HS, hockey-stick stylet; Group DS, D-blade type stylet; Group CS, CoPilot® videolaryngoscope rigid stylet®; Group GEB, gum elastic bougie; and Group NS, no stylet. A manikin was used to simulate difficult intubation with a Storz C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope. The duration of each intubation stage was evaluated. Results Participants in this study (33 anesthesiology residents and 20 anesthesiology experts) completed a total of 265 intubations. The number of attempts made using no stylet was significantly greater than those made for the other groups (p < 0.05 for group NS- group GEB, group NS- group DS, group NS- group CS and group NS- group HS). The duration to pass the vocal cords significantly differed among all groups (p < 0.001). The total intubation duration was shortest when using D-blade stylet, CoPilot stylet and hockey stick stylet. Although no difference was observed between stylet groups, a significant difference was found between each of these three and no stylet and gum elastic bougie (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Use of the correct stylet leads to a more efficient use of the Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. In our study, the use of the D-blade stylet, the CoPilot stylet and the hockey stick stylet provided quicker intubation, allowed easier passage of the vocal cords, and decreased the total intubation duration. To confirm the findings of our study, randomized controlled human studies are needed.
topic Videolaringoscópio C-MAC D-Blade®
Intubação
Estilete
Manequim
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500450&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT dilekomur comparisonofdifferentstyletsusedforintubationwiththecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT basakbayram comparisonofdifferentstyletsusedforintubationwiththecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT suleozbilgin comparisonofdifferentstyletsusedforintubationwiththecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT volkanhancı comparisonofdifferentstyletsusedforintubationwiththecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT baharkuvaki comparisonofdifferentstyletsusedforintubationwiththecmacdbladevideolaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledstudy
_version_ 1725511970109521920