Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.

Differences in copper (Cu) absorption and transport, physiological responses and structural characteristics between two types of Cu-resistant plants, Oenothera glazioviana (Cu-exclusion type) and Elsholtzia haichowensis (Cu-enrichment type), were investigated in the present study. The results indica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Fu, Chen Chen, Bin Wang, Xishi Zhou, Shuhuan Li, Pan Guo, Zhenguo Shen, Guiping Wang, Yahua Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4514476?pdf=render
id doaj-8e6eb5f023da4a03bc4e79c76cfb3502
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e6eb5f023da4a03bc4e79c76cfb35022020-11-25T02:04:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01107e013342410.1371/journal.pone.0133424Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.Lei FuChen ChenBin WangXishi ZhouShuhuan LiPan GuoZhenguo ShenGuiping WangYahua ChenDifferences in copper (Cu) absorption and transport, physiological responses and structural characteristics between two types of Cu-resistant plants, Oenothera glazioviana (Cu-exclusion type) and Elsholtzia haichowensis (Cu-enrichment type), were investigated in the present study. The results indicated the following: (1) After 50 μM Cu treatment, the Cu ratio in the xylem vessels of E. haichowensis increased by 60%. A Cu adsorption experiment indicated that O. glazioviana exhibited greater resistance to Cu, and Cu absorption and the shoot/root ratio of Cu were significantly lower in O. glazioviana than in E. haichowensis. (2) An analysis of the endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) variance and exogenous ABA treatment demonstrated that the ABA levels of both plants did not differ; exogenous ABA treatment clearly reduced Cu accumulation in both plants. (3) The leaf stomatal density of O. glazioviana was significantly less than that of E. haichowensis. Guard cells in E. haichowensis plants were covered with a thick cuticle layer, the epidermal hair was more numerous and longer, and the number of xylem conduits in the root was small. (4) The transpiration rate and the stomatal conductance of O. glazioviana were both significantly lower than those of E. haichowensis, regardless of whether the plants were treated with Cu. Taken together, these results indicate that the differences in the structural characteristics between these two plant species, particularly in the characteristics related to plant transpiration, are important factors that govern whether plants acquire or exclude Cu.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4514476?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lei Fu
Chen Chen
Bin Wang
Xishi Zhou
Shuhuan Li
Pan Guo
Zhenguo Shen
Guiping Wang
Yahua Chen
spellingShingle Lei Fu
Chen Chen
Bin Wang
Xishi Zhou
Shuhuan Li
Pan Guo
Zhenguo Shen
Guiping Wang
Yahua Chen
Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lei Fu
Chen Chen
Bin Wang
Xishi Zhou
Shuhuan Li
Pan Guo
Zhenguo Shen
Guiping Wang
Yahua Chen
author_sort Lei Fu
title Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.
title_short Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.
title_full Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.
title_fullStr Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Copper Absorption and Accumulation between Copper-Exclusion and Copper-Enrichment Plants: A Comparison of Structure and Physiological Responses.
title_sort differences in copper absorption and accumulation between copper-exclusion and copper-enrichment plants: a comparison of structure and physiological responses.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Differences in copper (Cu) absorption and transport, physiological responses and structural characteristics between two types of Cu-resistant plants, Oenothera glazioviana (Cu-exclusion type) and Elsholtzia haichowensis (Cu-enrichment type), were investigated in the present study. The results indicated the following: (1) After 50 μM Cu treatment, the Cu ratio in the xylem vessels of E. haichowensis increased by 60%. A Cu adsorption experiment indicated that O. glazioviana exhibited greater resistance to Cu, and Cu absorption and the shoot/root ratio of Cu were significantly lower in O. glazioviana than in E. haichowensis. (2) An analysis of the endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) variance and exogenous ABA treatment demonstrated that the ABA levels of both plants did not differ; exogenous ABA treatment clearly reduced Cu accumulation in both plants. (3) The leaf stomatal density of O. glazioviana was significantly less than that of E. haichowensis. Guard cells in E. haichowensis plants were covered with a thick cuticle layer, the epidermal hair was more numerous and longer, and the number of xylem conduits in the root was small. (4) The transpiration rate and the stomatal conductance of O. glazioviana were both significantly lower than those of E. haichowensis, regardless of whether the plants were treated with Cu. Taken together, these results indicate that the differences in the structural characteristics between these two plant species, particularly in the characteristics related to plant transpiration, are important factors that govern whether plants acquire or exclude Cu.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4514476?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT leifu differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT chenchen differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT binwang differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT xishizhou differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT shuhuanli differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT panguo differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT zhenguoshen differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT guipingwang differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
AT yahuachen differencesincopperabsorptionandaccumulationbetweencopperexclusionandcopperenrichmentplantsacomparisonofstructureandphysiologicalresponses
_version_ 1724941130516135936