Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model

<p>Freshwater lakes are important in carbon cycling, especially in the boreal zone where many lakes are supersaturated with the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and emit it to the atmosphere, thus ventilating c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Kiuru, A. Ojala, I. Mammarella, J. Heiskanen, K.-M. Erkkilä, H. Miettinen, T. Vesala, T. Huttula
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-09-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/3297/2019/bg-16-3297-2019.pdf
id doaj-8e68ad668cdd43f7ada7b830d984ddb4
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Kiuru
P. Kiuru
A. Ojala
A. Ojala
A. Ojala
I. Mammarella
J. Heiskanen
J. Heiskanen
K.-M. Erkkilä
H. Miettinen
T. Vesala
T. Vesala
T. Huttula
spellingShingle P. Kiuru
P. Kiuru
A. Ojala
A. Ojala
A. Ojala
I. Mammarella
J. Heiskanen
J. Heiskanen
K.-M. Erkkilä
H. Miettinen
T. Vesala
T. Vesala
T. Huttula
Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model
Biogeosciences
author_facet P. Kiuru
P. Kiuru
A. Ojala
A. Ojala
A. Ojala
I. Mammarella
J. Heiskanen
J. Heiskanen
K.-M. Erkkilä
H. Miettinen
T. Vesala
T. Vesala
T. Huttula
author_sort P. Kiuru
title Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model
title_short Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model
title_full Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model
title_fullStr Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model
title_full_unstemmed Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model
title_sort applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for co<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake model
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Biogeosciences
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
publishDate 2019-09-01
description <p>Freshwater lakes are important in carbon cycling, especially in the boreal zone where many lakes are supersaturated with the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and emit it to the atmosphere, thus ventilating carbon originally fixed by the terrestrial system. The exchange of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> between water and the atmosphere is commonly estimated using simple wind-based parameterizations or models of gas transfer velocity (<span class="inline-formula"><i>k</i></span>). More complex surface renewal models, however, have been shown to yield more correct estimates of <span class="inline-formula"><i>k</i></span> in comparison with direct <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> flux measurements. We incorporated four gas exchange models with different complexity into a vertical process-based physico-biochemical lake model, MyLake C, and assessed the performance and applicability of the alternative lake model versions to simulate air–water <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> fluxes over a small boreal lake. None of the incorporated gas exchange models significantly outperformed the other models in the simulations in comparison to the measured near-surface <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> concentrations or respective air–water <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> fluxes calculated directly with the gas exchange models using measurement data as input. The use of more complex gas exchange models in the simulation, on the contrary, led to difficulties in obtaining a sufficient gain of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> in the water column and thus resulted in lower <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> fluxes and water column <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> concentrations compared to the respective measurement-based values. The inclusion of sophisticated and more correct models for air–water <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> exchange in process-based lake models is crucial in efforts to properly assess lacustrine carbon budgets through model simulations in both single lakes and on a larger scale. However, finding higher estimates for both the internal and external sources of inorganic carbon in boreal lakes is important if improved knowledge of the magnitude of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> evasion from lakes is included in future studies on lake carbon budgets.</p>
url https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/3297/2019/bg-16-3297-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pkiuru applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT pkiuru applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT aojala applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT aojala applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT aojala applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT imammarella applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT jheiskanen applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT jheiskanen applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT kmerkkila applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT hmiettinen applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT tvesala applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT tvesala applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
AT thuttula applicabilityandconsequencesoftheintegrationofalternativemodelsforcosub2subtransfervelocityintoaprocessbasedlakemodel
_version_ 1725889082110771200
spelling doaj-8e68ad668cdd43f7ada7b830d984ddb42020-11-24T21:49:10ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892019-09-01163297331710.5194/bg-16-3297-2019Applicability and consequences of the integration of alternative models for CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity into a process-based lake modelP. Kiuru0P. Kiuru1A. Ojala2A. Ojala3A. Ojala4I. Mammarella5J. Heiskanen6J. Heiskanen7K.-M. Erkkilä8H. Miettinen9T. Vesala10T. Vesala11T. Huttula12Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, Survontie 9A, 40500 Jyväskylä, FinlandUniversity of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 35, 40014 University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, FinlandFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140 Lahti, FinlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandICOS ERIC Head Office, Erik Palménin aukio 1, 00560 Helsinki, FinlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandFinnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, Survontie 9A, 40500 Jyväskylä, Finland<p>Freshwater lakes are important in carbon cycling, especially in the boreal zone where many lakes are supersaturated with the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and emit it to the atmosphere, thus ventilating carbon originally fixed by the terrestrial system. The exchange of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> between water and the atmosphere is commonly estimated using simple wind-based parameterizations or models of gas transfer velocity (<span class="inline-formula"><i>k</i></span>). More complex surface renewal models, however, have been shown to yield more correct estimates of <span class="inline-formula"><i>k</i></span> in comparison with direct <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> flux measurements. We incorporated four gas exchange models with different complexity into a vertical process-based physico-biochemical lake model, MyLake C, and assessed the performance and applicability of the alternative lake model versions to simulate air–water <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> fluxes over a small boreal lake. None of the incorporated gas exchange models significantly outperformed the other models in the simulations in comparison to the measured near-surface <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> concentrations or respective air–water <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> fluxes calculated directly with the gas exchange models using measurement data as input. The use of more complex gas exchange models in the simulation, on the contrary, led to difficulties in obtaining a sufficient gain of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> in the water column and thus resulted in lower <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> fluxes and water column <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> concentrations compared to the respective measurement-based values. The inclusion of sophisticated and more correct models for air–water <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> exchange in process-based lake models is crucial in efforts to properly assess lacustrine carbon budgets through model simulations in both single lakes and on a larger scale. However, finding higher estimates for both the internal and external sources of inorganic carbon in boreal lakes is important if improved knowledge of the magnitude of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> evasion from lakes is included in future studies on lake carbon budgets.</p>https://www.biogeosciences.net/16/3297/2019/bg-16-3297-2019.pdf